AllportG. W. (1946). Personalistic psychology as science: A reply. Psychological Review, 53, 132–135.
2.
BackM. D. (2017). Editorial. European Journal of Personality, 31, 3–7.
3.
BackM. D. (2018). Editorial: Continued quality, openness, and curiosity at the European Journal Of Personality. European Journal of Personality, 32, 3–5.
4.
BackM. D. (2019). Editorial: Increasing scientific quality in the expanding field of personality science. European Journal of Personality, 33, 3–6.
5.
BackM. D., & EgloffB. (2009). Yes we can! A plea for direct behavioral observation in personality research. European Journal of Personality, 23, 403–405.
6.
BainbridgeT. F., QuinlanJ. A., MarR. A., & SmillieL. D. (2019). Openness/intellect and susceptibility to pseudo–profound bullshit: A replication and extension. European Journal of Personality, 33, 72–88.
7.
BaumertA., SchmittM., PeruginiM., JohnsonW., BlumG., BorkenauP., CostantiniG., … WrzusC. (2017). Integrating personality structure, personality process, and personality development. European Journal of Personality, 31, 503–528. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2115.
8.
BleidornW., HillP., BackM. D., DenissenJ. J. A., HenneckeM., HopwoodC. J., … RobertsB. (2019). The policy relevance of personality traits. American Psychologist, 74, 1056–1067. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000503.
9.
BreilS. M., GeukesK., WilsonR. E., NestlerS., VazireS., & BackM. D. (2019). Zooming into real–life extraversion: How personality and situation shape sociability in social interactions. Collabra: Psychology, 5, 7.
10.
ChambersC. D. (2013). Registered reports: A new publishing initiative at cortex. Cortex, 49, 609–610.
11.
CoelhoG. L. H., HanelP. H. P., JohansenM. K., & MaioG. R. (2019). Mapping the structure of human values through conceptual representations. European Journal of Personality, 33, 34–51.
12.
den BoerL., KlimstraT. A., BranjeS. J. T., MeeusW. H. J., & DenissenJ. J. A. (2019). Personality maturation during the transition to working life: Associations with commitment as a possible indicator of social investment. European Journal of Personality, 33, 456–467.
13.
EgloffB. (2018). To make innovations such as replication mainstream, publish them in mainstream journals. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 41, e126.
14.
FettermanA. K., RutjensB. T., LandkammerF., & WilkowskiB. M. (2019). On post–apocalyptic and doomsday prepping beliefs: A new measure, its correlates, and the motivation to prep. European Journal of Personality, 33, 506–525.
15.
FurrR. M. (2009). Personality psychology as a truly behavioural science. European Journal of Personality, 23, 369–401.
16.
GençE., FraenzC., SchlüterC., FriedrichP., VoelkleM. C., HossiepR., & GüntürkünO. (2019). The neural architecture of general knowledge. European Journal of Personality, 33, 589–605.
17.
HahnE., GottschlingJ., BleidornW., KandlerC., SpenglerM., KornadtA. E., SchulzW., … SpinathF. M. (2016). What drives the development of social inequality over the life course? The German TwinLife study. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 19, 659–672.
18.
HarariG. M., MüllerS. R., AungM. S. H., & RentfrowP. J. (2017). Smartphone sensing methods for studying behavior in everyday life. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 18, 83–90.
19.
HenneckeM., CzikmantoriT., & BrandstätterV. (2019). Doing despite disliking: Self–regulatory strategies in everyday aversive activities. European Journal of Personality, 33, 104–128.
20.
HumbergS., DufnerM., SchönbrodtF. D., GeukesK., HuttemanR., KüfnerA. C. P., van ZalkM. H. W., … BackM. D. (2019). Is accurate, positive, or inflated self–perception most advantageous for psychological adjustment? A competitive test of key hypotheses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 116, 835–859.
21.
IlmarinenV.–J., VainikainenM.–P., VerkasaloM., & LönnqvistJ.–E. (2019). Peer sociometric status and personality development from middle childhood to preadolescence. European Journal of Personality, 33, 606–626.
22.
KrizanZ., & HisslerG. (2019). Personality and sleep: Neuroticism and conscientiousness predict behaviourally recorded sleep years later. European Journal of Personality, 33, 133–153.
23.
KuperN., KäckenmesterW., & WackerJ. (2019). Resting frontal EEG asymmetry and personality traits: A meta–analysis. European Journal of Personality, 33, 154–175.
24.
LangeF., & DewitteS. (2019). Cognitive flexibility and pro–environmental behaviour: A multimethod approach. European Journal of Personality, 33, 488–505.
25.
McAuliffeW. H. B., ForsterD. E., PedersenE. J., & McCulloughM. E. (2019). Does cooperation in the laboratory reflect the operation of a broad trait?European Journal of Personality, 33, 89–103.
26.
MotaS., HumbergS., KrauseS., FatfoutaR., GeukesK., Schröder–AbéM., & BackM. D. (in press). Unmasking Narcissus: A competitive test of existing hypotheses on (agentic, antagonistic, neurotic, and communal) narcissism and (explicit and implicit) self–esteem across 18 samples. Self and Identity, https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2019.1620012
27.
MottusR., & AllerhandM., & JohnsonW. (2017). Computational modeling of person–situation transactions: How accumulation of situational experiences can shape the distributions of trait scores. In FunderD. C., RauthmannJ. F., & ShermanR. A. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of psychological situations. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190263348.013.23
28.
MunafòM. R., NosekB. A., BishopD. V. M., ButtonK. S., ChambersC. D., Percie du SertN., SimonsohnU., … IoannidisJ. P. A. (2017). A manifesto for reproducible science. Nature Human Behavior, 1, 0021. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562–016–0021.
29.
NoordhofA., KamphuisJ. H., EigenhuisA., BoyetteL.–L., & ConradiH. J. (2017). Let all flowers bloom: There is no need for complete integration of different approaches to personality. European Journal of Personality, 31, 560–562.
30.
NowakA., VallacherR. R., & ZochowskiM. (2005). The emergence of personality: Dynamic foundations of individual variation. Developmental Review, 25, 351–385.
31.
OlaruG., SchroedersU., WilhelmO., & OstendorfF. (2019). “Grandpa, do you like roller coasters?”: Identifying age–appropriate personality indicators. European Journal of Personality, 33, 264–278.
32.
PfattheicherS., GeigerM., HartungJ., WeissS., & SchindlerS. (2017). Old wine in new bottles? The case of self–compassion and neuroticism. European Journal of Personality, 31, 160–169.
33.
RogozaR., CieciuchJ., StrusW., & BaranT. (2019). Seeking a common framework for research on narcissism: An attempt to integrate the different faces of narcissism within the circumplex of personality metatraits. European Journal of Personality, 33, 437–455.
34.
SchmidM. M., Gatica–PerezD., FrauendorferD., NguyenL., & ChoudhuryT. (2015). Social sensing for psychology: Automated interpersonal behavior assessment. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24, 154–160.
35.
VitriolJ. A., LarsenE. G., & LudekeS. G. (2019). The generalizability of personality effects in politics. European Journal of Personality, 33, 631–641.
36.
WrzusC. (2019). Does age matter for personality psychology?European Journal of Personality, 33, 217–220.
37.
WrzusC., & MehlM. (2015). Lab and/or field? Measuring personality processes and their social consequences. European Journal of Personality, 29, 250–271.