AbbassA., LuytenP., SteinertC., & LeichsenringF. (2017). Bias toward psychodynamic therapy: Framing the problem and working toward a solution. Journal of Psychiatric Practice, 23(5), 361–365. https://doi.org/10.1097/pra.0000000000000256
2.
AdlerJ.M. (2011). Epistemological tension in the future of personality disorder diagnosis. American Journal of Psychiatry, 168(11), 1221–1222.
3.
AdlerJ.M. (2012a). Sitting at the nexus of epistemological traditions: Narrative psychological perspectives on self–knowledge. In VazireS. & WilsonT.D. (Eds.) Handbook of self–knowledge (pp. 327–342). New York: Guilford Press.
4.
AdlerJ.M. (2012b). Living into the story: Agency and coherence in a longitudinal study of narrative identity development and mental health over the course of psychotherapy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(2), 367–389.
5.
AdlerJ.M., ChinE.D., KolisettyA.P., & OltmannsT.F. (2012). The distinguishing characteristics of narrative identity in adults with features of borderline personality disorder: An empirical investigation. Journal of Personality Disorders, 26, 498–512.
6.
AdlerJ.M., DunlopW.L., FivushR., LilgendahlJ.P., Lodi–SmithJ., McAdamsD.P., McLeanK.C., PasupathiM., & SyedM. (2017). Research methods for studying narrative identity: A primer. Social Psychology and Personality Science, 8, 519–527.
7.
AdlerJ.M., Lodi–SmithJ., PhilippeF.L., HouleI. (2016). The incremental validity of narrative identity in predicting well–being: A review of the field and recommendations for the future. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 20(2), 142–175.
8.
AdlerJ.M., TurnerA.F., BrookshierK.M., MonahanC., Walder–BiesanzI., HarmelingL.H., AlbaughM., McAdamsD.P., OltmansT.F. (2015). Variation in narrative identity is associated with trajectories of mental health over several years. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108(3), 476–496.
9.
AldenL. E., WigginsJ. S., & PincusA. L. (1990). Construction of circumplex scales for the inventory of interpersonal problems. Journal of Personality Assessment, 55, 521–536.
10.
AllportG. W. (1924). The study of the undivided personality. The Journal of Abnormal Psychology and Social Psychology, 19(2), 132–141. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0064744
11.
AllportG. W. (1931). What is a trait of personality?The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 25(4), 368–372. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0075406
12.
AllportG. W. (1937). Personality: A psychological interpretation. New York, NY, US: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
13.
American Psychiatric Association. (1952). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. (1st ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
14.
American Psychiatric Association. (1968). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
15.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
16.
AmodioD. M., & FrithC. D. (2006). Meeting of minds: The medial frontal cortex and social cognition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 7(4), 268. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1884
17.
AnchinJ.C., & PincusA.L. (2010). Evidence–based interpersonal psychotherapy with personality disorders: Theory, components, and strategies. In MagnavitaJ.J. (Ed.), Evidence–based treatment of personality dysfunction: Principles, methods, and processes (pp. 113–166). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
18.
AngusL. E., & McLeodJ. (2004). Toward an integrative framework for understanding the role of narrative in the psychotherapy process. In AngusL. E. & McLeodJ. (Eds.), The handbook of narrative and psychotherapy: Practice, theory, and research (p. 367–374). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
19.
AnsellE.B., & PincusA.L. (2004). Interpersonal perceptions of the five–factor model of personality: An examination using the structural summary method for circumplex data. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 167–201.
20.
ArntzA., KlokmanJ., & SieswerdaS. (2005). An experimental test of the schema mode model of borderline personality disorder. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 36, 226–239.
21.
AsendorpfJ. B., & Motti–StefanidiF. (2018) Mediated disposition–environment transactions: The DAE model. European Journal of Personality, 22(3), 167–185.
22.
AsendorpfJ. B., & van AkenM. A. (1999). Resilient, overcontrolled, and undercontrolled personality prototypes in childhood: Replicability, predictive power, and the trait–type issue. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(4), 815–832.
23.
AtkinsonJ. W., & BirchD. (1970). The dynamics of action. New York, NY: John Wiley.
24.
BachB., & FarrellJ. M. (2018). Schemas and modes in borderline personality disorder: The mistrustful, shameful, angry, impulsive, and unhappy child. Psychiatry Research, 259, 323–329.
25.
BachB., LeeC., MortensenE. L., & SimonsenE. (2016). How do DSM–5 personality traits align with schema therapy constructs?. Journal of Personality Disorders, 30, 502–529.
26.
BackM. D., BaumertA., DenissenJ. J. A., HartungF., PenkeL., SchmukleS. C., … WrzusC. (2011a). PERSOC: A unified framework for understanding the dynamic interplay of personality and social relationships. European Journal of Personality, 25, 90–107. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.811
27.
BackM. D., KüfnerA. P., DufnerM., GerlachT. M., RauthmannJ. F., & DenissenJ. A. (2013). Narcissistic admiration and rivalry: Disentangling the bright and dark sides of narcissism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105, 1013–1037.
28.
BackM. D., PenkeL., SchmukleS. C., SachseK., BorkenauP., & AsendorpfJ. B. (2011b). Why mate choices are not as reciprocal as we assume: The role of personality, flirting and physical attractiveness. European Journal of Personality, 25, 120–132. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.806
29.
BackM. D., SchmukleS. C., & EgloffB. (2010). Why are narcissists so charming at first sight? Decoding the narcissism–popularity link at zero acquaintance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 132–145. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016338
30.
BanduraA. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. New Jersey: Prentice–Hall.
31.
BanduraA. (1999). Social cognitive theory of personality. In CervoneD. & ShodaY. (Eds.), The coherence of personality: Social–cognitive bases of consistency, variability, and organization (pp. 185–241). New York: Guilford Press.
32.
BatemanA., & FonagyP. (2006). Mentalization–based treatment for borderline personality disorder. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
33.
BatesonG. (1979). Mind and nature: A necessary unity. New York: Ballantine.
34.
BaumeisterR. F., VohsK. D., & FunderD. C. (2007). Psychology as the science of self–reports and finger movements: Whatever happened to actual behavior?Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2, 396–403.
35.
BaumertA., SchmittM., PeruginiM., JohnsonW., BlumG., BorkenauP., ... WrzusC. (2017a). Working towards integration of personality structure, process, and development. European Journal of Personality, 31, 577–595.
36.
BaumertA., SchmittM., PeruginiM., JohnsonW., BlumG., BorkenauP., ... WrzusC. (2017b). Integrating personality structure, personality process, and personality development. European Journal of Personality, 31(5), 503–528. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2115
37.
BeckA. T., BrownG., SteerR. A., EidelsonJ. I., & RiskindJ. H. (1987). Differentiating anxiety and depression: A test of the cognitive content–specificity hypothesis. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 96(3), 179–183.
38.
BeckA. T., ButlerA. C., BrownG. K., DahlsgaardK. K., NewmanC. F., & BeckJ. S. (2001). Dysfunctional beliefs discriminate personality disorders. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 39(10), 1213–1225.
39.
BeckA. T., FreemanA., & DavisD. D. (2004). Cognitive therapy of personality disorders. New York. NY: Guilford.
40.
BeckA. T., RushA. J., ShawB. F., & EmeryG. (1979). Cognitive therapy of depression. 1979. New York: Guilford Press Google Scholar.
41.
BemD. J., & AllenA. (1974). On predicting some of the people some of the time: The search for cross–situational consistencies in behavior. Psychological Review, 81, 506–520. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0037130
42.
BenderD. S., MoreyL. C., & SkodolA. E. (2011). Toward a model for assessing level of personality functioning in DSM–5, part I: A review of theory and methods. Journal of Personality Assessment, 93(4), 332–346. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2011.583808
43.
BenderD.S., & SkodolA.E. (2007). Borderline personality as a self–other representational disturbance. Journal of Personality Disorders, 21, 500–517.
44.
BeneckeC., & BraunerF. (2017). Motivation und Emotion. Psychologische und psychoanalytische Perspektiven [Motivation and emotion. Psychological and psychoanalytic perspectives]. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.
45.
BenjaminL. S. (1996). Interpersonal diagnosis and treatment of personality disorders (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford.
BernsteinD. P., IscanC., & MaserJ. (2007). Opinions of personality disorder experts regarding the DSM–IV personality disorders classification system. Journal of Personality Disorders, 21(5), 536–551. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2007.21.5.536
48.
BerntsonG., BiggerT., EckbergD. L., GrossmanP., KaufmannP. G., MalikM., NagarajaH. N., PorgesS. W., SaulJ. P., StoneP. H., & Van Der MolenkM. W. (1997). Heart rate variability: Origins, methods, and interpretive caveats. Psychophysiology, 34, 623–648.
49.
BiesanzJ. C. (2010). The social accuracy model of interpersonal perception: Assessing individual differences in perceptive and expressive accuracy. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 45(5), 853–885.
50.
BlackieL. E. R., & JayawickremeE. (2015). The example of adverse life experiences as unique situations. European Journal of Personality, 29, 385–386.
51.
BlackieL. E. R., JayawickremeE., TsukayamaE., ForgeardM. J. C., RoepkeA. M., & FleesonW. (2017). Post–traumatic growth as positive personality change: Developing a measure to assess within–person variability. Journal of Research in Personality, 69, 22–32.
52.
BlackieL.E.R., RoepkeA.M., ForgeardM. J. C., JayawickremeE. & FleesonW. (2014). Act well to be well: The promise of changing personality states to promote well–being. In ParksA. C. (Ed.), Handbook of positive psychological interventions (pp. 462–474). Oxford: Wiley–Blackwell.
53.
BleidornW., & HopwoodC. J. (2018). Using machine learning to advance personality assessment and theory. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 108886831877299. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868318772990
54.
BleidornW., HopwoodC. J., & LucasR. E. (2018). Life events and personality trait change. Journal of Personality, 86, 83–96.
55.
BleidornW., HopwoodC. J., & WrightA. G. (2017). Using big data to advance personality theory. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 18, 79–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2017.08.004
56.
BleidornW., KlimstraT. A., DenissenJ. J., RentfrowP. J., PotterJ., & GoslingS. D. (2013). Personality maturation around the world: A cross–cultural examination of social–investment theory. Psychological Science, 24, 2530–2540.
BlockJ. (2010). The five–factor framing of personality and beyond: Some ruminations. Psychological Inquiry, 21, 2–25.
59.
BlumG., & SchmittM. (2017). The nonlinear interaction of person and situation (NIPS) model and its values for a psychology of situations. In RauthmannJ. F., ShermanR. & FunderD. C. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of psychological situations. Oxford University Press.
60.
BoagS. (2011). Explanation in personality psychology: “Verbal magic” and the five–factor model. Philosophical Psychology, 24, 223–243.
61.
BoagS. (2015). Personality assessment, ‘construct validity’, and the significance of theory. Personality and Individual Differences, 84, 36–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.12.039
62.
BoagS. (in press). Personality dynamics, motivation, and the logic of explanation. Review of General Psychology
63.
BolgerN., & LaurenceauJ. P. (2012). Intensive longitudinal methods: An introduction to diary and experience sampling research. New York: Guilford Press.
64.
BornsteinR. F. (2006). Self–schema priming and desire for test performance feedback: Further evaluation of a cognitive/interactionist model of interpersonal dependency. Self and Identity, 5, 110–126.
65.
BornsteinR. F. (2010). The rocky road from Axis I to Axis II: Extending the network model of diagnostic comorbidity to personality pathology. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2–3), 151–152.
66.
BornsteinR. F. (2011a). Reconceptualizing personality pathology in DSM–5: Limitations of evidence in eliminating dependent personality disorder and other DSM–IV syndromes. Journal of Personality Disorders, 25, 235–247.
67.
BornsteinR. F. (2011b). Toward a process–focused model of test score validity: Improving psychological assessment in science and practice. Psychological Assessment, 23, 532–544.
68.
BornsteinR. F. (2015). Personality assessment in the diagnostic manuals: On mindfulness, multiple methods, and test score discontinuities. Journal of Personality Assessment, 97, 446–455.
69.
BornsteinR. F. (2018). The trait–type dialectic: Construct validity, clinical utility, and the diagnostic process. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000299
70.
BorsboomD., & CramerA. O. (2013). Network analysis: An integrative approach to the structure of psychopathology. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 9, 91–121. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev–clinpsy–050212–185608
71.
BorsboomD., MellenberghG. J., & van HeerdenJ. (2004). The concept of validity. Psychological Review, 111(4), 1061–1071. doi: 2004–19012–010 [pii] https://doi.org/10.1037/0033–295X.111.4.1061
72.
BosE.H., ten HaveM., van DorsselaerS., JeronimusB.F., de GraafR., de JongeP. (2018). Functioning before and after a major depressive episode: Pre–existing vulnerability or scar? A prospective three–wave population–based study. Psychological Medicinehttps://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291717003798
73.
BrownA. D. (2017). The dynamics of affect: Using Newtonian mechanics, reinforcement sensitivity theory, and the cues–tendencies–actions model to simulate individual differences in emotional experience (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Northwestern University.
74.
BrunerJ. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
75.
BucherM. A., SuzukiT., & SamuelD. B. (2018). A systematic review of personality traits and their associations with mental health treatment outcomes. Submitted for publication.
76.
BussA. H. (1989). Personality as traits. American Psychologist, 44(11), 1378–1388.
77.
BussD. M., & CraikK. H. (1983). The act frequency approach to personality. Psychological Review, 90(2), 105–126.
78.
CainN. M., AnsellE. B., WrightA. G., HopwoodC. J., ThomasK. M., PintoA., ... GriloC.M. (2012). Interpersonal pathoplasticity in the course of major depression. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 80, 78–86.
79.
CainN. M., MeehanK. B., RocheM. J., ClarkinJ. F., & De PanfilisC. (in press). Effortful control and interpersonal behavior in daily life. Journal of Personality Assessment
80.
CainN.M., & PincusA.L. (2016). Treating maladaptive interpersonal signatures. In LivesleyW.J., DimaggioG.S., & ClarkinJ.F. (Eds.), Integrated treatment for personality disorder: A modular approach (pp. 305–324). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
81.
CainN.M., PincusA.L., & Grosse HoltforthM. (2010). Interpersonal subtypes in social phobia: Diagnostic and treatment implications. Journal of Personality Assessment, 92, 514–527.
82.
CantorN. (1990). From thought to behavior: “having” and “doing” in the study of personality and cognition. American Psychologist, 45(6), 735–750. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003–066X.45.6.735
83.
CarsonR. C. (1969). Interaction concepts of personality. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
84.
CaspiA. (1998). Personality development across life course. In DamonW. (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 311–388). New York: Wiley.
85.
CaspiA., HoutsR. M., BelskyD. W., Goldman–MellorS. J., HarringtonH., IsraelS., … MoffittT. E. (2014). The p factor: One general psychopathology factor in the structure of psychiatric disorders?Clinical Psychological Science, 2, 119–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702613497473
86.
CastonguayL.G., BarkhamM., LutzW., & McAleavyA. (2013). Practice oriented research: Approaches and applications. In. LambertM.J. (Ed.), Bergin & Garfield's handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change. 6th Edition. Hoboken, N.J.: Wiley. pp. 85–133
87.
CervoneD. (1999). Bottom–up explanation in personality psychology: The case of cross–situational coherence. In CervoneD. & ShodaY. (Eds.), The coherence of personality: Social–cognitive bases of personality consistency, variability, and organization (pp. 303–341). New York: Guilford Press.
88.
CervoneD. (2004). The architecture of personality. Psychological Review, 111, 183–204.
CervoneD. & LittleB. R. (in press). Personality architecture and dynamics: The new agenda, and what's new about it. Special issue, Personality and Individual Differences: Dynamic Personality Psychology.
91.
CervoneD., & MischelW. (Eds.) (2002). Advances in personality science. New York: Guilford Press.
92.
CervoneD., & ShodaY. (Eds.) (1999). The coherence of personality: Social–cognitive bases of consistency, variability, and organization. New York: Guilford Press.
93.
ChmielewskiM., & WatsonD. (2009). What is being assessed and why it matters: The impact of transient error on trait research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 186–202.
94.
ChurchA. T. (2016). Personality traits across cultures. Current Opinion in Psychology, 8, 22–30.
ClarkinJ. F., & HuprichS. K. (2011). Do the DSM–5 personality disorder proposals meet criteria for clinical utility?Journal of Personality Disorders, 24, 192–205.
97.
ClarkinJ. F., YeomansF., & KernbergO. F. (2006). Psychotherapy for borderline personality disorder: Focusing on object relations. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.
98.
CleckleyH. (1941). The mask of sanity. St. Louis: Mosby.
99.
CogswellA., & EmmertN. (2014). Multimethod assessment of implicit and explicit processes. In HopwoodC. J. & BornsteinR. F. (Eds.), Multimethod clinical assessment (pp. 150–174). NY: Guilford Press.
100.
CohlerB. J., & HammackP. L. (2007). The psychological world of the gay teenager: Social change, narrative, and normality. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 36, 47–59.
101.
ColeP. M., BendezúJ. J., RamN., & ChowS.–M. (2017). Dynamical systems modeling of early childhood self–regulation. Emotion, 17, 684–699. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000268
102.
CollinsL. M. (2006). Analysis of longitudinal data: The integration of theoretical model, temporal design, and statistical model. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 505–528.
103.
CollinsL. M., & GrahamJ. W. (2002). The effect of timing and temporal spacing of observations in longitudinal studies of tobacco and other drug use: Temporal design considerations. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 68, 585–596.
104.
CollinsM. D., JacksonC. J., WalkerB. R., O'ConnorP. J., & GardinerE. (2017). Integrating the context–appropriate balanced attention model and reinforcement sensitivity theory: Towards a domain–general personality process model. Psychological Bulletin, 143, 91–106.
105.
ColvinC. R. (1993). “Judgable” people: Personality, behavior, and competing explanations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(5), 861–873. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022–3514.64.5.861
106.
ConwayC.C., HammenC., & BrennanP. (2012). A comparison of latent class, latent trait, and factor mixture models of DSM–IV borderline personality disorder criteria in a community setting: Implications for DSM–5. Journal of Personality Disorders, 26, 793–803.
107.
ConwayC. C., TackettJ. L., & SkodolA. E. (2017). Are personality disorders assessed in young people?American Journal of Psychiatry, 174(10), 1000–1001.
108.
CorrP. J., & McNaughtonN. (2008). Reinforcement sensitivity theory and personality. In CorrP. J. (Ed.), The reinforcement sensitivity theory of personality (pp. 155–187). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
109.
CostaP. T., HerbstJ. H., McCraeR. R., SamuelsJ., & OzerD. J. (2002). The replicability and utility of three personality types. European Journal of Personality, 16, 73–87.
110.
CostaP.T.Jr., & McCraeR.R. (1980). Influence of extraversion and neuroticism on subjective well–being: Happy and unhappy people. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 668–678.
111.
CostaP. T.Jr., McCraeR. R., & LöckenhoffC. E. (in press). Personality across the lifespan. Annual Review of Psychology
112.
CramerA. O. J., Van der SluisS., NoordhofA., WichersM., GeschwindN., AggenS. H., KendlerK. S., & BorsboomD. (2012). Dimensions of normal personality as networks in search of equilibrium: You can't like parties if you don't like people. European Journal of Personality, 26, 414–431. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1866
113.
CramerA. O., WaldorpL. J., Van Der MaasH. L., & BorsboomD. (2010). Comorbidity: A network perspective. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33, 137–193.
114.
CramerP. (2006). Protecting the self: Defense mechanisms in action. NY: Guilford Press.
115.
CranfordJ. A., ShroutP. E., IidaM., RafaeliE., YipT., & BolgerN. (2006). A procedure for evaluating sensitivity to within–person change: Can mood measures in diary studies detect change reliably?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 917–929.
116.
CronbachL. J. (1971). Test validation. In ThorndikeR. L. (Ed.), Educational measurement (2nd edition, pp. 443–507). Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
117.
DamianR. I., & RobertsB. W. (2014). Integrating post–traumatic growth into a broader model of life experiences and personality change. European Journal of Personality, 28, 334–336.
118.
DarleyJ. M., & FazioR. H. (1980). Expectancy confirmation processes arising in the social interaction sequence. American Psychologist, 35, 867–881.
119.
DarosA. R., ZakzanisK. K., & RuoccoA. C. (2013). Facial emotion recognition in borderline personality disorder. Psychological Medicine, 43, 1953–1963. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291712002607
120.
DawoodS., DowgwilloE. A., WuL. Z., & PincusA. L. (2018). Contemporary integrative interpersonal theory of personality. In Zeigler–HillV. & ShackelfordT. K. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of personality and individual differences: Volume 1. The science of personality and individual differences (pp. 171–202). London: SAGE.
121.
DawoodS., & PincusA.L. (2016). Multi–surface interpersonal assessment in a cognitive behavioral therapy context. Journal of Personality Assessment, 98, 449–460.
122.
De KwaadstenietL., HagmayerY., KrolN. P. C. M., & WittemanC. L. M. (2010). Causal client models in selecting effective interventions: A cognitive mapping study. Psychological Assessment, 22, 581–592.
123.
De RaadB., BareldsD.P.H., LevertE., OstendorfF., MlacicB., Di BlasL. et al. (2010). Only three factors of personality description are fully replicable across languages: A comparison of 14 trait taxonomies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 160–73.
124.
De ZwartP., JeronimusB.F., de JongeP. (2018). Empirical evidence for definitions of episode, remission, recovery, relapse and recurrence in depression: A systematic review. Epidemiology and Psychiatric Scienceshttps://doi.org/10.1017/S2045796018000227
125.
Del GiudiceM. (2014). Middle childhood: An evolutionary–developmental synthesis. Child Development Perspectives, 8(4), 193–200.
126.
Del GiudiceM. (2016). The life history model of psychopathology explains the structure of psychiatric disorders and the emergence of the p factor. Clinical Psychological Science, 4(2), 299–311. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702615583628
127.
DermodyS. S., ThomasK. M., HopwoodC. J., DurbinC. E., & WrightA. G. C. (2017). Modeling the complexity of dynamic, momentary interpersonal behavior: Applying the time–varying effect model to test predictions from interpersonal theory. Journal of Research in Personality, 68, 54–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2017.03.001
DeYoungC. G., QuiltyL. C., & PetersonJ. B. (2007). Between facets and domains: 10 aspects of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 880–896. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022–3514.93.5.880
130.
DimaggioG., SemerariA., CarcioneA., NicoloG., & ProcacciM. (2007). The perpetuation of personality disorders: A model. In Psychotherapy of personality disorders: Metacognition, states of mind and interpersonal cycles (pp. 1–28). New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.22516
131.
DomaradzkaE., & FajkowskaM. (2018). Cognitive emotion regulation strategies in anxiety and depression understood as types of personality. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 856. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00856
132.
DonhauserP. W., RöschA. G., & SchultheissO. C. (2015). The implicit need for power predicts recognition speed and accuracy for dynamic changes in facial expressions of emotion. Motivation and Emotion, 39, 714–721.
133.
DowgwilloE.A., RocheM.J., & PincusA.L. (in press). Examining the interpersonal nature of Criterion A of the DSM–5 Section III alternative model for personality disorders using bootstrapped confidence intervals for the interpersonal circumplex. Journal of Personality Assessment
134.
DowneyG., & FeldmanS. I. (1996). Rejection sensitivity and the rejection–hostility link in romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 1327–1340.
DuH., & WangL. (in press). Reliabilities of intraindividual variability indicators with autocorrelated longitudinal data: Implications for longitudinal study designs. Multivariate Behavioral Research
137.
DumontF. (2010). A history of personality psychology: Theory, science, and research from Hellenism to the twenty–first century. New York: Cambridge University Press.
138.
DunlopW. L. (2013). Master narratives of personality psychologists: Implications for research and training. Society for Personality and Social Psychology Student Forum, Spring2013, 9–10.
139.
DunlopW. L. (2015a). Contextualized personality, beyond traits. European Journal of Personality, 29, 310–325. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1995
140.
DunlopW. L. (2015b). Lives as the organizing principle in personality psychology. European Journal of Personality, 29, 353–357. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2006
141.
DurbinC. E., & HicksB. M. (2014). Personality and psychopathology: A stagnant field in need of development. European Journal of Personality, 28(4), 362. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1962
142.
EasdenM. H., & KazantzisN. (2018). Case conceptualization research in cognitive behavior therapy: A state of the science review. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 74(3), 356–384. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.22516
143.
Ebner–PriemerU. W., EidM., KleindienstN., StabenowS. & TrullT.J. (2009). Analytic strategies for understanding affective (in) stability and other dynamic processes in psychopathology. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 188, 195–202.
144.
EdensJ. F., MarcusD. K., & RuizM. A. (2008). Taxometric analyses of borderline personality features in a large–scale male and female offender sample. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 117, 705–711.
145.
EngelhardI., LommenM., & SijbrandijM. (2014). Changing for better or worse? Posttraumatic growth reported by soldiers deployed to Iraq. Clinical Psychological Science, 3(5), 789–796. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702614549800
146.
FajkowskaM. (2013). Personality coherence and incoherence: A perspective on anxiety and depression. Clinton Corners, NY: Eliot Werner Publications.
147.
FajkowskaM. (2015). The complex–system approach to personality: Main theoretical assumptions. Journal of Research in Personality56, 15–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2014.09.003
FatfoutaR., Zeigler–HillV., & Schröder–AbéM. (2017). I'm merciful, am I not? Facets of narcissism and forgiveness revisited. Journal of Research in Personality, 70, 166–173.
150.
FisherA. J., MegdaliaJ., & JeronimusB. F. (2018). Lack of group–to–individual generalizability is a threat to human subjects research. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(27), E6106–E6115. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1711978115
151.
FleesonW. (2001). Towards a structure and process integrated view of personality: Traits as density distributions of states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 1011–1027. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022–3514.80.6.1011
152.
FleesonW. (2004). Moving personality beyond the person–situation debate: The challenge and the opportunity of within–person variability. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13(2), 83–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963–7214.2004.00280.x
153.
FleesonW. (2017). The production mechanisms of traits: Reflections on two amazing decades. Journal of Research in Personality, 69, 4–12.
FleesonW., FurrR. M., MneimneM., & ArnoldE. M. (in press). Using basic personality process models to inform the personality disorders: Core momentary stressor–symptom contingencies as basic etiology. In LynamD. R. & SamuelD. B. (Eds.). Using basic personality research to inform the personality disorders. Oxford University Press.
156.
FletcherG. J. O. & KerrP. S. G. (2010). Through the eyes of love: Reality and illusion in intimate relationships. Psychological Bulletin, 136(4), 627–658.
157.
FonagyP. & BatemanA. (2006). Mechanism of change in mentalization based treatment of borderline personality disorder. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 62, 411–430.
158.
FonagyP., LuytenP., AllisonE., & CampbellC. (2017). What we have changed our minds about: Part 1. Borderline personality disorder as a limitation of resilience. Borderline Personality Disorder and Emotion Dysregulation, 4, 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40479–017–0061–9
159.
FosterJ., & GaddisB. (August, 2015). The incremental validity of dark side personality over FFM scales. Presented at the 75th Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management. Vancouver, BC.
160.
FournierM. A., & MoskowitzD. S. (2018). Cross–situational consistency, variability, and the behavioral signature. In Zeigler–HillV. & ShackelfordT. K. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of personality and individual differences: Volume 2. Origins of personality and individual differences (pp. 218–240). London: SAGE.
161.
FraleyR. C. (2002). Attachment stability from infancy to adulthood: Meta–analysis and dynamic modeling of developmental mechanisms. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6(2), 123–151. Doi https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957pspr0602_03
162.
FraleyR. C., & BrumbaughC. C. (2004). A dynamical systems approach to conceptualizing and studying stability and change in attachment security. In RholesW. S. & SimpsonJ. A. (Eds.), Adult attachment: Theory, research, and clinical implications (pp. 86–132). New York: Guilford Press.
163.
FraleyR.C., & RobertsB. W. (2005). Patterns of continuity: A dynamic model for conceptualizing the stability of individual differences in psychological constructs across the life course. Psychological Review, 112, 60–74. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033–295X.112.1.60
164.
FraleyR. C., RoismanG. I., Booth–LaForceC., OwenM. T., & HollandA. S. (2013). Interpersonal and genetic origins of adult attachment styles: A longitudinal study from infancy to early adulthood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(5), 817–838. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031435
165.
FraleyR. C., VicaryA. M., BrumbaughC. C., & RoismanG. I. (2011). Patterns of stability in adult attachment: An empirical test of two models of continuity and change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(5), 974–992. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024150
166.
FrazierP., CoyneJ. & TennenH. (2014). Post–traumatic growth: A call for less, but better, research. European Journal of Psychology, 28, 337–338.
167.
FruzzettiA. E., SantistebanD. A., & HoffmanP. D. (2007). Dialectical behavior therapy with families. In DimeffL. A. & KoernerK. (Eds.), Dialectical behavior therapy in clinical practice: Applications across disorders and settings (pp. 222–244). New York, NY, US: Guilford Press.
168.
FuaK., RevelleW., & OrtonyA. (2010). Modeling personality and individual differences: The approach–avoid–conflict triad. In Annual meeting of the cognitive science society (cogsci 2010) (Vol. 31, pp. 25–30). Portland, OR.
FunderD. C. (2015). The goals of personality psychology. European Journal of Personality, 29, 328–329. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2006
171.
FunderD. C. (2016). Taking situations seriously: The situation construal model and the Riverside Situational Q–Sort. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 25(3), 203–208.
172.
FunderD. C., & ColvinC. R. (1991). Explorations in behavioral consistency: Properties of persons, situations, and behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(5), 773.
173.
FurrR. M., & FunderD. C. (in press). Person, situations, and person–situation interactions. In JohnO. P. & RobinsR. W. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (4th ed.). New York: Guilford.
174.
GerstorfD., HoppmannC. A., & RamN. (2014). The promise and challenges of integrating multiple time–scales in adult developmental inquiry. Research in Human Development, 11(2), 75–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427609.2014.906725
175.
GloverN., MillerJ. D., LynamD. R., CregoC., & WidigerT. A. (2012). The five–factor narcissism inventory: A five–factor measure of narcissistic personality traits. Journal of Personality Assessment, 94, 500–512.
176.
GoldbergL. R. (1993). The structure of phenotypic personality traits. American Psychologist, 48, 26–34.
177.
GoldfriedM. R. (2010). The future of psychotherapy integration: Closing the gap between research and practice. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 20, 386–396.
178.
GoldsmithH. H., & RothbartM. K. (1999). The laboratory temperament assessment battery. Locomotor Version, 3.
179.
GollwitzerP. M., & SheeranP. (2006). Implementation intentions and goal achievement: A meta–analysis of effects and processes. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 69–119.
180.
GrandeT. (2007). Wie stellen sich Konflikt und Struktur in Beziehungen dar? [How do conflict and structure present themselves in relationships?]. Zeitschrift für Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie, 53, 144–162.
181.
GrangerC. W. (1969). Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross–spectral methods. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 424–438.
182.
GranicI., & PattersonG. R. (2006). Toward a comprehensive model of antisocial development: A dynamic systems approach. Psychological Review, 113, 101–131. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033–295X.113.1.101
GrayJ. A., & McNaughtonN. (2000). The neuropsychology of anxiety: An enquiry into the function of the septo–hippocampal system, 2nd edition. New York: Oxford University Press.
185.
GreenM. F., PennD. L., BentallR., CarpenterW. T., GaebelW., GurR. C., ... & HeinssenR. (2008). Social cognition in schizophrenia: An NIMH workshop on definitions, assessment, and research opportunities. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 34(6), 1211–1220. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbm145
186.
GroveJ. L., SmithT. W., GirardJ. M., & WrightA. G. C. (in press). Narcissistic admiration and rivalry: An interpersonal approach to construct validation. Journal of Personality Disorders
187.
GundersonJ. G. (2010). Commentary on “Personality Traits and the Classification of Mental Disorders: Toward a More Complete Integration in DSM–5 and an Empirical Model of Psychopathology”. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 1, 119–122.
188.
GundersonJ.G., StoutR.L., McGlashanT.H., SheaM.T., MoreyL.C., GriloC.M., … SkodolA.E. (2011). Ten–year course of borderline personality disorder: Psychopathology and function from the Collaborative Longitudinal Personality Disorders Study. Archives of General Psychiatry, 68, 827–837.
189.
GurvenM., von RuedenC., MassenkoffM., & KaplanH. (2013). How universal is the Big Five? Testing the five–factor model of personality variation among forager–farmers in the Bolivian Andes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 354–370.
190.
GutierrezF., GarrizM., PeriJ.M., FerrazL., SolD., NavarroJ.B., BarbadillaA., ValdesM. (2013). Fitness costs and benefits of personality disorder traits. Evolution and Human Behavior, 34, 31–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2012.09.001
191.
HabermasT., & BluckS. (2000). Getting a life: The emergence of the life story in adolescence. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 748–769.
192.
HagemeyerB., DufnerM., & DenissenJ. J. A. (2016). Double dissociation between implicit and explicit affiliative motives: A closer look at socializing behavior in dyadic interactions. Journal of Research in Personality, 65, 89–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2016.08.003
193.
HakamataY., LissekS., Bar–HaimY., BrittonJ. C., FoxN. A., LeibenluftE., ... & PineD. S. (2010). Attention bias modification treatment: A meta–analysis toward the establishment of novel treatment for anxiety. Biological Psychiatry, 68(11), 982–990.
194.
HamakerE. L., KuiperR. M., & GrasmanR. P. (2015). A critique of the cross–lagged panel model. Psychological Methods, 20(1), 102–116.
195.
HammackP.L. (2011). Narrative and the politics of identity: The cultural psychology of Israeli and Palestinian youth. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
196.
HampsonS. E. (2012). Personality processes: Mechanisms by which personality traits “get outside the skin”. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 315–339.
HarmsP. D., SpainS. M., & HannahS. T. (2011). You underestimate the power of the dark side. Presented at the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Chicago, IL.
199.
HarréR. (1998). The singular self: An introduction to the psychology of personhood. London: Sage.
200.
HegelG.W.F. (1807). The phenomenology of spirit. Translated by T. Pinkard, Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
201.
HellerA. S., FoxA. S., & DavidsonR. J. (2018). Parsing affective dynamics to identify risk for mood and anxiety disorders. Emotionhttps://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000440
202.
HelmJ. L., RamN., ColeP. M., & ChowS.–M. (2016). Modeling self–regulation as a process using a multiple time–scale multiphase latent basis growth model. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 23(5), 635–648. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2016.1178580
203.
HelsonR., KwanV.S.Y., JohnO.P., & JonesC. (2002). The growing evidence for personality change in adulthood: Findings from research with personality inventories. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 287–306.
204.
HenkelM., ZimmermannJ., KüneckeJ., RemmersC., & BeneckeC. (2018). Same same but different: Das Potential der Operationalisierten Psychodynamischen Diagnostik für ein differenziertes Verständnis von Persönlichkeitsstörungen [Same same but different: The potential of the Operationalized Psychodynamic Diagnosis for a differentiated understanding of personality disorders]. Zeitschrift für Psychiatrie, Psychologie und Psychotherapie, 66, 107–117.
205.
HenryJ. D., Von HippelW., MolenberghsP., LeeT., & SachdevP. S. (2016). Clinical assessment of social cognitive function in neurological disorders. Nature Reviews Neurology, 12(1), 28. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneurol.2015.229
206.
HerpertzS.C., & BertschK. (2015). A new perspective on the pathophysiology of borderline personality disorder: A model of the role of oxytocin. American Journal of Psychiatry, 172, 840–851.
207.
HerpertzS. C., HuprichS. K., BohusM., ChanenA., GoodmanM., MehlumL., … SharpC. (2017). The challenge of transforming the diagnostic system of personality disorders. Journal of Personality Disorders, 31, 577–589.
208.
HerpertzS. C., JeungH., ManckeF., & BertschK. (2014). Social dysfunctioning and brain in borderline personality disorder. Psychopathology, 47(6), 417–424. https://doi.org/10.1159/000365106
209.
HoferJ., & BuschH. (2011). When the needs for affiliation and intimacy are frustrated: Envy and indirect aggression among German and Cameroonian adults. Journal of Research in Personality, 45, 219–228.
210.
HofsteeW. K. B. (1990). The use of everyday personality language for scientific purposes. European Journal of Personality, 4, 77–88.
211.
HoganR. (1983). A socioanalytic theory of personality. In PageM. M. (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation, 1982 (Vol. 29, pp. 55–89). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
212.
HoganR. (2007). Personality and the fate of organizations. Mahwah, NJ. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
213.
HoganR., & BlickleG. (2018). Socioanalytic theory of personality. In Zeigler–HillV. & ShackelfordT. K. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of personality and individual differences. New York: Meteor Spring.
HopwoodC. J. (2011). Personality traits in the DSM–5. Journal of Personality Assessment, 93(4), 398–405.
216.
HopwoodC. J. (2018a). Interpersonal dynamics in personality and personality disorders. European Journal of Personality, 32, 499–524.
217.
HopwoodC. J. (2018b). A framework for treating DSM–5 alternative model for personality disorder features. Personality and Mental Health, 12, 107–125.
218.
HopwoodC. J., HarrisonA. L., AmoleM. C., GirardJ. M., WrightA. G., ThomasK. M., … KashyD. A. (2018a). Impacts of familiarity, conflict, and sex on continuous interpersonal behavior. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/HQPT7
219.
HopwoodC. J., HarrisonA. L., AmoleM., GirardJ. M., WrightA. G., & ThomasK. M. (in press). Properties of the continuous assessment of interpersonal dynamics across sex, level of familiarity, and interpersonal conflict.
220.
HopwoodC. J., KotovR., KruegerR. F., WatsonD., WidigerT. A., AlthoffR.R., … ZimmermannJ. (2018b). The time has come for dimensional personality disorder diagnosis. Personality and Mental Health, 12, 82–86.
221.
HopwoodC. J., MaloneJ. C., AnsellE. B., SanislowC. A., GriloC. M., McGlashanT. H., ... & GundersonJ. G. (2011). Personality assessment in DSM–5: Empirical support for rating severity, style, and traits. Journal of Personality Disorders, 25, 305–320.
222.
HopwoodC. J., MoreyL. C., AnsellE. B., GriloC. M., SanislowC. A., McGlashanT. H., ... SkodolA. E. (2009). The convergent and discriminant validity of five–factor traits: Current and prospective social, work, and recreational dysfunction. Journal of Personality Disorders, 23(5), 466–476.
223.
HopwoodC.J., PincusA.L., & WrightA.G.C. (in press). The interpersonal situation: Integrating personality assessment, case formulation, and intervention. In SamuelD.B. & LynamD.R. (Eds.), Using basic personality research to inform personality disorders. New York: Oxford University Press.
HopwoodC. J., WrightA. G., AnsellE. B., & PincusA. L. (2013). The interpersonal core of personality pathology. Journal of Personality Disorders, 27(3), 270–295.
226.
HopwoodC. J., ZimmermannJ., PincusA. L., & KruegerR. F. (2015). Connecting personality structure and dynamics: Towards a more empirically–based and clinically useful diagnostic system. Journal of Personality Disorders, 29, 431–448.
227.
HorowitzL. M. (2004). Interpersonal foundations of psychopathology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
228.
HorowitzL. M., WilsonK. R., TuranB., ZolotsevP., ConstantinoM. J., & HendersonL. (2006). How interpersonal motives clarify the meaning of interpersonal behavior: A revised circumplex model. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 67–86.
229.
HorstmannK.T., RauthmannJ.F., & ShermanR.A. (2018). Measurement of situational influences. In Zeigler–HillV. (ed.), The SAGE handbook of personality and individual differences (pp. 465–484). Sage.
230.
HorvathS., & MorfC. C. (2009). Narcissistic defensiveness: Hypervigilance and avoidance of worthlessness. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 1252–1258.
231.
HorvathS., MorfC. C. (2010). To be grandiose or not to be worthless: Different routes to self–enhancement for narcissism and self–esteem. Journal of Research in Personality, 44, 585–592.
232.
HorwitzA.V. (2015). DSM–I and DSM–II. In CautinR.L. & LilienfeldS.O. (Eds.), The encyclopedia of clinical psychology. Wiley Online Library.
233.
HorwitzA. V., & WakefieldJ. C. (2007). The loss of sadness: How psychiatry transformed normal sorrow into depressive disorder. New York: Oxford University Press.
234.
HoubenM., Van Den NoortgateW., & KuppensP. (2015). The relation between short–term emotion dynamics and psychological well–being: A meta–analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 141(4), 901–930. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038822
235.
HudsonN. W., & FraleyR. C. (2015). Volitional personality trait change: Can people choose to change their personality traits?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109, 490–507.
236.
HudsonN. W., & RobertsB. W. (2016). Social investment in work reliably predicts change in conscientiousness and agreeableness: A direct replication and extension of Hudson, Roberts, and Lodi–Smith (2012). Journal of Research in Personality, 60, 12–23.
237.
HumanL. J., & BiesanzJ. C. (2011). Target adjustment and self–other agreement: Utilizing trait observability to disentangle judgeability and self–knowledge. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(1), 202–2016. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023782
238.
HuprichS. K. (2012). Considering the evidence and making the most empirically–informed decision about depressive personality in the DSM–5. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 3, 470–482.
239.
HuprichS. K. (2015). Personality disorders into the 21st century: Cacophony, integration, and melody In HuprichS. K. (Ed.) Personality disorders: Assessment, diagnosis, research (pp. 3–19). Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.
240.
HuprichS. K. (in press). It's time to move beyond categories and dimensions in personality pathology diagnosis and assessment. The British Journal of Psychiatry
241.
HuprichS. K. & NelsonS. (2015). Advancing the assessment of personality pathology with the cognitive–affective processing system. Journal of Personality Assessment, 97, 467–777.
242.
HuprichS. K., AuerbachJ. S., PorcerelliJ. H., & BuppL. L. (2016). Sidney Blatt's object relations inventory: Contributions and future directions. Journal of Personality Assessment, 98, 30–43.
243.
JahngS., WoodP. K., & TrullT. J. (2008). Analysis of affective instability in EMA: Indices using successive difference and group comparison via multilevel modeling. Psychological Methods, 13, 345–375.
244.
JayawickremeE. (2017). Could a situational judgment test predict likelihood of personality change following experience of adversity?European Journal of Personality, 31, 460–461.
245.
JayawickremeE. & BlackieL.E.R. (2014). Posttraumatic growth as positive personality change: Evidence, controversies and future directions. European Journal of Personality, 28, 312–331.
246.
JayawickremeE. & BlackieL.E.R. (2016). Exploring the psychological benefits of hardship: A critical reassessment of posttraumatic growth. Switzerland: Springer.
247.
JayawickremeE. & ZachryC. E. (2018). Positive personality change following adversity. In Zeigler–HillV. & ShackelfordT. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of personality and individual differences.
248.
JayawickremeE., ZachryC. E. & FleesonW. (in press). Whole trait theory: An integrative approach to examining personality structure and process. Personality and Individual Differences
249.
JeronimusB. F., KotovR., RieseH., & OrmelJ. (2016). Neuroticism's prospective association with mental disorders: A meta–analysis on 59 longitudinal/prospective studies with 443 313 participants. Psychological Medicine, 46(14), 2883–2906. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291716001653
250.
JohnO. P., & SrivastavaS. (1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research, 2(1999), 102–138.
251.
JohnsonW., GowA. J., CorleyJ., RedmondP., HendersonR., MurrayC., . . . DearyI. J. (2012). Can we spot deleterious ageing in two waves of data? The Lothian Birth Cohort 1947 from ages 70 to 73. Longitudinal and Life Course Studies, 3, 312–331.
252.
JonesA.B., BrownN.A., SerfassD.G., & ShermanR.A. (2014). Traumatic experiences yield changes in the situation experience. European Journal of Personality, 28, 339–340.
253.
JudgeT. A., SimonL. S., HurstC., & KelleyK. (2014). What I experienced yesterday is who I am today: Relationship of work motivations and behaviors to within–individual variation in the five–factor model of personality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99, 199–221.
254.
KaganJ. (2002). Surprise, uncertainty, and mental structures. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
KazdinA.E. (2008). Evidence–based treatment and practice: New opportunities to bridge clinical research and practice, enhance the knowledge base, and improve patient care. American Psychologist, 63, 146–159.
257.
KellyG. A. (1955). The psychology of personal constructs. Oxford, England. Norton.
258.
KendellR., & JablenskyA. (2003). Distinguishing between the validity and utility of psychiatric diagnoses. American Journal of Psychiatry, 160, 4–12.
259.
KendlerK. S., ZacharP., & CraverC. (2011). What kinds of things are psychiatric disorders?Psychological Medicine, 41, 1143–1150.
260.
KennyD. A., KashyD. A., & CookW. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. New York: Guilford Press.
261.
KennyD. A., KorchmarosJ. D., & BolgerN. (2003). Lower level mediation in multilevel models. Psychological Methods, 8, 115–128.
262.
KernbergO. F. (1984). Severe personality disorders: Psychotherapeutic strategies. New Haven: Yale University Press.
263.
KesslerK.C., McGonagleK.A., ZhaoS. (1994). Lifetime and 12–month prevalence of DSM–III–R psychiatric disorders in the United States: Results from the national comorbidity survey. Archives of General Psychiatry, 51, 8–19.
264.
KesslerR.C., OrmelJ., PetukhovaM., McLaughlinK.A., GreenJ.G. (2011). Development of lifetime comorbidity in the World Health Organization world mental health surveys. Archives of General Psychiatry, 68, 90–100.
265.
KieslerD. J. (1988). Therapeutic metacommunication: Therapist impact disclosure as feedback in psychotherapy. Palo Alto, CA, England: Consulting Psychologists Press
266.
KieslerD. J. (1996). Contemporary interpersonal theory and research. New York, NY: Wiley.
267.
KlimstraT.A., & DenissonJ. A. (2017). A theoretical framework for the associations between identity and psychopathology. Developmental Psychology, 53(11), 2052–2065.
268.
KlimstraT.A., LuyckxK., HaleW.W.III, GoossensL., MeeusW.H.J. (2010). Longitudinal associations between personality profile stability and adjustment in college students: Distinguishing among overall stability, distinctive stability, and within–time normativeness. Journal of Personality, 78(4), 1163–1184. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467–6494.2010.00646.x
269.
KöberC., & HabermasT. (2017). How stable is the personal past? Stability of most important autobiographical memories and life narratives across eight years in a life span sample. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113(4), 608–626.
270.
KöllnerM., & SchultheissO. C. (2014). Meta–analytic evidence of low convergence between implicit and explicit measures of the needs for achievement, affiliation, and power. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(826). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00826
271.
KordikA., EskaK., & SchultheissO. C. (2012). Implicit need for affiliation is associated with increased corrugator activity in a non–positive, but not in a positive social interaction. Journal of Research in Personality, 46, 604–608.
272.
KotovR., GamezW., SchmidtF., & WatsonD. (2010). Linking “big” personality traits to anxiety, depressive, and substance use disorders: A meta–analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 768–821. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020327
273.
KotovR., KruegerR.F., WatsonD., AchenbachT.M., AlthoffR.R., BagbyR.M., … ZimmermanM. (2017). The Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): A dimensional alternative to traditional nosologies. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 126, 454–477.
274.
KraepelinE. (1899). Psychiatrie (6th edition). Leipzig: Verlag von Johann Ambrosius Barth.
275.
KruegerR. F. (2013). Personality disorders are the vanguard of the post–DSM–5.0 era. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 4, 355–362.
276.
KruegerR. F., DerringerJ., MarkonK. E., WatsonD., & SkodolA. E. (2012). Initial construction of a maladaptive personality trait model and inventory for DSM–5. Psychological Medicine, 42(9), 1879–1890. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291711002674
277.
KruegerR. F., KotovR., WatsonD., ForbesM. K., EatonN. R., RuggeroC. J., … & ZimmermannJ. (2018). Progress in achieving quantitative classification of psychopathology. World Psychiatry, 17, 282–293.
278.
KruegerR. F., & MarkonK. E. (2014). The role of the DSM–5 personality trait model in moving toward a quantitative and empirically based approach to classifying personality and psychopathology. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 10, 477–501. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev–clinpsy–032813–153732
279.
KruegerR.F., SkodolA.E., LivesleyW.J., ShroutP.E., & HuangY. (2007). Synthesizing dimensional and categorical approaches to personality disorders: Refining the research agenda for DSM–V Axis II. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 16Suppl 1, S65–S73.
280.
KuhlJ. (2000). The volitional basis of personality systems interaction theory: Applications in learning and treatment contexts. International Journal of Educational Research, 33, 665–703.
281.
KuhnT.S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
282.
KuppensP., OraveczZ., & TuerlinckxF. (2010). Feelings change: Accounting for individual differences in the temporal dynamics of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 1042–1060. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020962
283.
KuppensP., SheeberL. B., YapM. B. H., WhittleS., SimmonsJ. G., & AllenN. B. (2012). Emotional inertia prospectively predicts the onset of depressive disorder in adolescence. Emotion, 12, 283–289. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025046
284.
KuppensP., & VerduynP. (2015). Looking at emotion regulation through the window of emotion dynamics. Psychological Inquiry, 26, 72–79.
285.
LaceulleO. M., VolleberghW. A. M., & OrmelJ. (2015). The structure of psychopathology in adolescence: Replication of a general psychopathology factor in the TRAILS study. Clinical Psychological Science, 3(6), 850–860. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702614560750
286.
LaceulleO. M., JeronimusB. F., AkenM. A. G., & OrmelJ. (2015). Why not everyone gets their fair share of stress: Adolescent's perceived relationship affection mediates associations between temperament and subsequent stressful social events. European Journal of Personality, 29(2), 125–137.
287.
LaheyB. B., RathouzP. J., KeenanK., SteppS. D., LoeberR., & HipwellA. E. (2015). Criterion validity of the general factor of psychopathology in a prospective study of girls. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 56(4), 415–422. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12300
288.
LakatosI. (1978). The methodology of scientific research programmes (Philosophical papers: Volume 1), WorrallJ. and CurrieG. (eds.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
289.
LaneS.T., GatesK.M., PikeH.K., BeltzA.M., & WrightA.G.C. (in press). Uncovering general, shared, and unique temporal patterns in ambulatory assessment data. Psychological Methods
290.
LangeJ., CrusiusJ., & HagemeyerB. (2016). The evil queen's dilemma: Linking narcissistic admiration and rivalry to benign and malicious envy. European Journal of Personality, 30(2), 168–188.
291.
LarsenR., BussD., Wismeijer, SongJ. (2017). Personality psychology, domains of knowledge about human nature. McGraw–Hill.
292.
LazarusS. A., CheavensJ. S., FestaF., & RosenthalM. Z. (2014). Interpersonal functioning in borderline personality disorder: A systematic review of behavioral and laboratory–based assessments. Clinical Psychology Review, 34(3), 193–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2014.01.007
293.
LearyT. F. (1957). Interpersonal diagnosis of personality: A functional theory and methodology for personality evaluation. New York, NY: Ronald.
294.
LedermannT., MachoS., & KennyD. A. (2011). Assessing mediation in dyadic data using the actor–partner interdependence model. Structural Equation Modeling, 18, 595–612.
295.
LeeuwS. E. V. D. (2004). Why model?Cybernetics and Systems, 35, 117–128.
296.
LernerR. M., & LernerJ. V. (in press). The development of a person: A relational developmental systems perspective. In McAdamsD., ShinerR. L., & TackettJ. L. (Eds.), Handbook of personality development. New York: Guilford Press.
297.
LilienfeldS. O., PatrickC. J., BenningS. D., BergJ., SellbomM., & EdensJ. F. (2012). The role of fearless dominance in psychopathy: Controversies, confusions, and clarifications. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 3, 327–340.
298.
LilienfeldS. O., WattsA. L., SmithS.F., BergJ. M., & LatzmanR. D. (2015). Psychopathy deconstructed and reconstructed: Identifying and assembling the personality building blocks of Cleckley's chimera. Journal of Personality, 83, 593–610.
299.
LilienfeldS. O., WattsA. L., SmithS. F., & LatzmanR. D. (2018). Boldness: Conceptual and methodological issues. In PatrickC. J. (Ed.), Handbook of psychopathy, 2nd edition (pp. 165–188). New York: Guilford.
300.
LindM., VanwoerdenS., PennerF., & SharpC. (under review). Inpatient adolescents with BPD features: Identity diffusion and narrative incoherence.
LinehanM.M. (1993). Cognitive–behavioral treatment for borderline personality disorder. New York: Guilford.
303.
LinehanM.M. (2014). DBT? Skills training manual. Guilford Publications.
304.
LittleB. R. (2000). Free traits and personal contexts: Expanding a social ecological model of well–being. In. WalshW. B., CraikK. H., & PriceR. H. (Eds.), Person environment psychology: New directions and perspectives (2nd ed., pp. 87–116). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
305.
LittleB. R. (2005). Personality science and personal projects: Six impossible things before breakfast. Journal of Research in Personality39: 4–21.
306.
LivesleyW. J. (1998). Suggestions for a framework for an empirically based classification of personality disorder. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 43, 137–147.
307.
LivesleyW.J. (2003). Diagnostic dilemmas in the classification of personality disorder. In PhillipsK., FirstM., & PincusH. A., (Eds). Advancing DSM: Dilemmas in psychiatric diagnosis, (pp. 153–189). Washington DC: American Psychiatric Association Press.
308.
LivesleyW. J. (2017). Integrated modular treatment for borderline personality disorder. Cambridge, UK; Cambridge University Press.
309.
LockeK. D. (2011). Circumplex measures of interpersonal constructs. In HorowitzL. M., & StrackS. (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal psychology: Theory, research, assessment, and therapeutic interventions (pp. 313–324). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
310.
Lodi–SmithJ. & RobertsB.W. (2007). Social investment and personality: A meta–analysis of the relationship of personality traits to investment in work, family, religion, and volunteerism. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11, 68–86.
311.
LoevingerJ. (1957). Objective tests as instruments of psychological theory. Psychological Reports, 3, 635–694.
LonginoH. E. (2006). Theoretical pluralism and the scientific study of behavior. In KellertS. H., LonginoH. E., & WatersC. K. (Eds.), Scientific pluralism (pp. 102–131). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
314.
LonginoH. E. (2015). Pluralism, incommensurability, and scientific change. In KendlerK. S, & ParnasJ., (eds.,) Philosophical issues in psychiatry III: The nature and sources of historical change (pp. 7–19). Oxford; Oxford University Press.
315.
LopesP. N., NezlekJ. B., ExtremeraN., HertelJ., Fernández–BerrocalP., SchützA., & SaloveyP. (2011). Emotion regulation and the quality of social interaction: Does the ability to evaluate emotional situations and identify effective responses matter?Journal of Personality, 79, 429–467.
316.
LukowitskyM.R., PincusA.L., HillL. L, & LoosD.K. (2008). Enduring dispositions as points of contact for the social–clinical interface: Publication trends from 1966 to the present. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 27, 389–403.
317.
LuongG., ArredondoC., & WrzusC. (in press). Age differences in emotion regulation dynamics: Anticipatory, reactivity, and recovery processes. In ColeP. M. & HollensteinT. (Eds.), The development of emotion regulation: A matter of time. New York: Taylor and Francis.
318.
LuytenP., & BlattS. J. (2011). Integrating theory–driven and empirically–derived models of personality development and psychopathology: A proposal for DSM–V. Clinical Psychology Review, 31, 52–68.
319.
LuytenP., & FonagyP. (2015). The neurobiology of mentalizing. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research and Treatment, 6(4), 366–379.
320.
LynamD.R., & MillerJ.D. (2012). Fearless dominance and psychopathy: A response to Lilienfeld et al. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 3, 341–353.
321.
LynamD.R., & MillerJ.D. (2015). Psychopathy from a basic trait perspective: The utility of a five–factor model approach. Journal of Personality, 83(6), 611–626.
322.
MachadoA., & SilvaF.F. (2007). Toward a richer view of the scientific method. American Psychologist, 62; 671–681.
323.
ManciniA., LittletonH., & GrillsA. (2015). Can people benefit from acute stress? Social support, psychological improvement and resilience after the Virginia Tech campus shootings. Clinical Psychological Science, 4(3), 401–417. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702615601001
324.
MarkusH. R. (2016). What moves people to action? Culture and motivation. Current Opinion in Psychology8, 161–166.
325.
MarkusK. A., & BorsboomD. (2013). Frontiers of test validity theory: Measurement, causation, and meaning: Routledge.
326.
MascaroO., & SperberD. (2009). The moral, epistemic, and mindreading components of children's vigilance towards deception. Cognition, 112(3), 367–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2009.05.012
327.
MasonA., & BlankenshipV. (1987). Power and affiliation motivation, stress, and abuse in intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 203–210.
328.
McAdamsD.P. (1992). The five–factor model in personality: A critical appraisal. Journal of Personality60, 329–361
329.
McAdamsD. P. (1995). What do we know when we know a person?Journal of Personality, 63, 365–396.
330.
McAdamsD. P. (1996). Personality, modernity, and the storied self: A contemporary framework for studying persons. Psychological Inquiry, 7, 295–321.
331.
McAdamsD. P. (2001). The psychology of life stories. Review of General Psychology, 5, 100–122.
332.
McAdamsD. P. (2006). The problem of narrative coherence. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 19, 109–125.
McAdamsD. P. (2015b). The art and science of personality development. New York:Guilford.
335.
McAdamsD. P., BauerJ. J., SakaedaA., AnyidohoN. A., MachadoM., MagrinoK., … PalsJ. L (2006). Continuity and change in the life story: A longitudinal study of autobiographical memories in emerging adulthood. Journal of Personality: 1371–1400.
336.
McAdamsD. P., & PalsJ. L. (2006). A new Big Five: Fundamental principles for an integrative science of personality. American Psychologist, 61(3), 204–217. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003–066X.61.3.204
McClellandD. C. (1958). Methods of measuring human motivation. In AtkinsonJ. W. (Ed.), Motives in fantasy, action, and society: A method of assessment and study (pp. 7–42). Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand.
339.
McClellandD. C., & BurnhamD. H. (2003). Power is the great motivator. Harvard Business Review, 81(1), 117–126+142.
340.
McCraeR. R. (2016). Integrating trait and process approaches to personality: A sketch of an agenda. In KumarU. (Ed.), Wiley handbook of personality assessment (pp. 3–18). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
341.
McCraeR.R., & CostaP. T. (1997). Personality trait structure as a human universal. American Psychologist, 52, 509–516.
342.
McCraeR. R., & CostaP. T.Jr. (2008). The five–factor theory of personality. In JohnO. P., RobinsR. W., & PervinL. A. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 159–181). New York: Guilford.
343.
McCraeR. R., De BolleM., LöckenhoffC. E., & TerraccianoA. (in press). Lifespan trait development: Towards an adequate theory of personality. In RauthmannJ. F. (Ed.), Handbook of personality dynamics and processes. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
344.
McCraeR. R., & SutinA. R. (2018). A five–factor theory perspective on causal analysis. European Journal of Personality, 32, 151–166.
345.
McGilchristI. (2009). The master and his emissary. The divided brain and the making of the Western world. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
346.
McKeeK. L., RappaportL. M., BokerS. M., MoskowitzD. S., NealeM. C. (2018, in press). Adaptive equilibrium regulation: Modeling individual dynamics on multiple timescales. Structural Equation Modelling.
347.
McLeanK. C., & SyedM. (2015). Personal, master, and alternative narratives: An integrative framework for understanding identity development in context. Human Development, 58, 318–349.
348.
McWilliamsN. (2012). Beyond traits: Personality as intersubjective themes. Journal of Personality Assessment, 94, 563–570.
349.
MeehanK.B., CainN.M., RocheM.J., ClarkinJ.F., & De PanfilisC. (2018). Rejection sensitivity and interpersonal behavior in daily life. Personality and Individual Differences, 126, 109–115.
350.
MeehanK. B., & ClarkinJ. F. (2015). A critical evaluation of moving toward a trait system for personality disorder assessment. In HuprichS. K. (Ed.), Personality disorders: Toward theoretical and empirical integration in assessment and diagnosis (pp. 85–106). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
351.
MeehlP. E. (1978). Theoretical risks and tabular asterisks: Sir Karl, Sir Ronald, and the slow progress of soft psychology. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, 806–834.
352.
MehlM. R., & ConnerT. S. (2012). Handbook of research methods for studying daily life. New York: Guilford.
353.
MeierB. P., & RobinsonM. D. (2004). Does quick to blame mean quick to anger? The role of agreeableness in dissociating blame and anger. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 856–867.
354.
MertonR. K. (1995). The Thomas theorem and the Matthew effect. Social Forces, 74, 379–422.
355.
MessickS. (1995). Validity of psychological assessment: Validation of inferences from persons’ responses and performances as inquiry into score meaning. American Psychologist, 50, 741–749.
356.
MihuraJ. L., MeyerG. J., DumitrascuN., & BombelG. (2013). The validity of individual Rorschach variables: Systematic reviews and meta–analyses of the comprehensive system. Psychological Bulletin, 139, 548–605.
357.
MillerJ. D., LynamD. R., & CampbellW. K. (2016). Measures of narcissism and their relations to DSM–5 pathological traits: A critical reappraisal. Assessment, 23, 3–9.
358.
MillerJ. D., SleepC. E., LamkinJ., VizeC. E., CampbellW. K., & LynamD. R. (in press). Personality disorder traits: Perceptions of likability, impairment and ability to change as correlates and moderators of desired level. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment.
359.
MillerJ.D., SleepC.S., & LynamD.R. (2018). DSM–5 alternative model of personality disorder: Testing the trait perspective captured in Criterion B. Contemporary Opinion in Psychology, 21, 50–54.
360.
MillonT. (2011). Disorders of personality: Introducing a DSM/ICD spectrum from normal to abnormal. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
361.
MischelW. (1968). Personality and assessment. New York: Wiley.
362.
MischelW. (1973). Toward a cognitive social learning reconceptualization of personality. Psychological Review, 80, 252–283.
363.
MischelW., Mendoza–DentonR., & ShodaY. (2002). Situation–behavior profiles as a locus of consistency in personality. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 50–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467–8721.00166
364.
MischelW., & ShodaY. (1995). A cognitive–affective system theory of personality: Reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure. Psychological Review, 102, 246–268. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033–295X.102.2.246
365.
MiskewiczK., FleesonW., ArnoldE. M., LawM. K., MneimneM. & FurrR. M. (2015). A contingency–oriented approach to understanding borderline personality disorder: Situational triggers and symptoms. Journal of Personality Disorders, 29, 486–502.
366.
MolenaarP. C. M., SinclairK. O., RovineM. J., RamN., & CornealS. E. (2009). Analyzing developmental processes on an individual level using nonstationary time series modeling. Developmental Psychology, 45, 260–271.
367.
MontoyaR. M., HortonR. S., KirchnerJ. (2008). Is actual similarity necessary for attraction? A meta–analysis of actual and perceived similarity. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 25(6), 889–922.
368.
MoreyL.C., & SkodolA.E. (2013). Convergence between DSM–IV–TR and DSM–5 diagnostic models for personality disorder: Evaluation of strategies for establishing diagnostic thresholds. Journal of Psychiatric Practice, 19, 179–193.
369.
MoreyL. C., SkodolA. E., & OldhamJ. M. (2014). Clinician judgments of clinical utility: A comparison of DSM–IV–TR personality disorders and the alternative model for DSM–5 personality disorders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 123(2), 398–405. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036481
370.
MoreyL.C., BenderD.S., & SkodolA.E. (2013). Validating the proposed Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition, severity indicator for personality disorder. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 201, 729–735.
371.
MoreyL.C., BensonK.T., & SkodolA.E. (2016). Relating DSM–5 section III personality traits to section II personality disorder diagnoses. Psychological Medicine, 46, 647–655.
372.
MoreyL.C., BerghuisH., BenderD.S., VerheulR., KruegerR.F., & SkodolA.E. (2011). Toward a model for assessing level of personality functioning in DSM–5, part II: Empirical articulation of a core dimension of personality pathology. Journal of Personality Assessment, 93, 347–353.
373.
MoreyL.C., HopwoodC.J., MarkowitzJ.C., GundersonJ.G., GriloC.M., McGlashanT.H., SheaM.T., YenS., SanislowC.A., AnsellE.B., & SkodolA.E. (2012). Comparison of alternative models for personality disorders, II: 6–, 8–, and 10–year follow–up. Psychological Medicine, 42, 1705–1713.
374.
MorfC. C. (2006). Personality reflected in a coherent idiosyncratic interplay of intra– and interpersonal self–regulatory processes. Journal of Personality, 74, 1527–1556.
375.
MorfC. C., RhodewaltF. (2001). Unraveling the paradoxes of narcissism: A dynamic self–regulatory processing model. Psychological Inquiry, 12, 177–196.
376.
MorseP., NeelR., ToddE., & FunderD.C. (2015). Renovating situational taxonomies: Exploring the construction and content of fundamental situation types. Journal of Personality83, 389–403.
377.
MoskowitzD. S. (1982). Coherence and cross–situational generality in personality: A new analysis of old problems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43(4), 754–768.
378.
MoskowitzD. S. (1994). Cross–situational generality and the interpersonal circumplex. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(5), 921–933.
379.
MõttusR., & AllerhandM. (2018). Why do traits come together? The underlying trait and network approaches. In SAGE handbook of personality and individual differences: Volume 1. The science of personality and individual differences (pp. 130–151). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
380.
MõttusR., AllerhandM., & JohnsonW. (2017a). Computational modeling of person–situation transactions. In RauthmannJ. F., ShermanR., & FunderD. C. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of psychological situations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
381.
MõttusR, KandlerC., BleidornW., RiemannR., & McCraeR. R. (2017b). Personality traits below facets: The consensual validity, longitudinal stability, heritability, and utility of personality nuances. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112, 474–490. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000100
382.
MulayA. L., CainN. M., WaughM. H., HopwoodC. J., AdlerJ. M., GarciaD. J., KurtzJ. E., LengerK. A., & SkadbergR. (2018). Personality constructs and paradigms in the alternative DSM–5 model of personality disorder. Journal of Personality Assessment
383.
Mullins–SweattS. N., & LengelG. J. (2012). Clinical utility of the five–factor model of personality disorder. Journal of Personality, 80(6), 1615–1639. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467–6494.2012.00774.x
384.
Mullins–SweattS.N., LengelG.J., & DeShongH.L. (2016). The importance of considering clinical utility in the construction of a diagnostic manual. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 12, 133–155.
385.
MurrayA. L., EisnerM., & RibeaudD. (2016). The development of the general factor of psychopathology ‘p factor’ through childhood and adolescence. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 44(8), 1573–1586. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802–016–0132–1
386.
MurrayH. A. (1938). Explorations in personality. New York: Oxford University Press
387.
OdumH. T. (2007). Environment, power, and society for the twenty–first century: The hierarchy of energy. New York: Columbia University Press.
388.
OltmannsT. F., FriedmanJ. N., FiedlerE. R., & TurkheimerE. (2004). Perceptions of people with personality disorders based on thin slices of behavior. Journal of Research in Personality, 38(3), 216–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092–6566(03)00066–7
389.
Task ForceOPD (2008). Operationalized psychodynamic diagnosis OPD–2: Manual of diagnosis and treatment planning. Cambridge, MA: Hogrefe & Huber.
390.
OrmelJ., JeronimusB.F., KotovR., RieseH., BosE.H., HankinB.L., RosmalenJ.G.M., OldehinkelA.J. (2013). Neuroticism and common mental disorders: Meaning and utility of a complex relationship. Clinical Psychology Review, 33(5), 686–697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2013.04.003
391.
OrmelJ., VonKorffM., JeronimusB. F., & RieseH. (2017). Set–point theory and personality development: Reconciliation of a paradox. In SpechtJ. (Ed.), Personality development across the lifespan (chapter 9). Elsevier.
392.
OrtnerT., & van de VijverF. J. R. (Eds.) (2015). Behavior based assessment: Going beyond self–report in the personality, affective, motivation, and social domains. Gottingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
393.
OrtonyA., NormanD. A., & RevelleW. (2005). Affect and proto–affect in effective functioning. In FellousJ.–M. & ArbibM. A. (Eds.), Who needs emotions?: The brain meets the robot (pp. 173–202). Oxford University Press.
ParrigonS., WooS. E., TayL., & WangT. (2017). CAPTION–ing the situation: A lexically–derived taxonomy of psychological situation characteristics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112(4), 642–681. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000111
397.
PearlJ. (2009). Causality: Models, reasoning, and inference. (Vol. 2). New York: Cambridge University Press.
398.
PickeringA. D. (1997). The conceptual nervous system and personality: From Pavlov to neural networks. European Psychologist, 2(2), 139–163.
399.
PincusA. L. (2017). An interpersonal perspective on Criterion A of the DSM–5 alternative model for personality disorders. Current Opinion in Psychology, 21, 11–17.
400.
PincusA.L. (2005). A contemporary integrative interpersonal theory of personality disorders. In LenzenwegerM.F. & ClarkinJ.F. (Eds.), Major theories of personality disorder (2nd Ed.) (pp. 282–331). New York: Guilford.
401.
PincusA.L. (2011). Some comments on nomology, diagnostic process, and narcissistic personality disorder in the DSM–5 proposal for personality and personality disorders. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 2, 41–53.
402.
PincusA.L. (2013). In through the out door: Commentary on “Personality Disorders are the Vanguard of the Post–DSM–5.0 Era.”Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 4, 363–364.
403.
PincusA.L. (2018). An interpersonal perspective on Criteria A of the DSM–5 alternative model for personality disorders. Contemporary Opinion in Psychology, 21, 11–17.
404.
PincusA.L., & CainN.M. (2008). Interpersonal psychotherapy. In RichardD.C.S. & HuprichS.K. (Eds.), Clinical psychology: Assessment, treatment, & research (pp. 213–245). New York: Academic Press.
405.
PincusA.L., DowgwilloE.A., & GreenbergL. (2016). Three cases of narcissistic personality disorder through the lens of the DSM–5 alternative model for personality disorders. Practice Innovations, 1, 164–177.
406.
PincusA.L., & GurtmanM.B. (2003). Interpersonal assessment. In WigginsJ.S., Paradigms of personality assessment (pp. 246–261). New York: Guilford.
407.
PincusA.L., & HopwoodC.J. (2012). A contemporary interpersonal model of personality pathology and personality disorder. In WidigerT.A. (Ed.), Oxford handbook of personality disorders (pp. 372–398). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
408.
PincusA.L., HopwoodC.J., & WrightA.G.C. (in press). The interpersonal situation: An integrative framework for the study of personality, psychopathology, and psychotherapy. In FunderD., RauthmannJ.F., & ShermanR. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of psychological situations. New York: Oxford University Press.
409.
PincusA.L., LukowitskyM.R., & WrightA.G.C. (2010). The interpersonal nexus of personality and psychopathology. In MillonT., KreugerR., & SimonsenE. (Eds.), Contemporary directions in psychopathology: Scientific foundations for DSM–V and ICD–11 (pp. 523–552). New York: Guilford.
410.
PincusA.L., LukowitskyM.R., WrightA.G.C., & EichlerW.C. (2009). The interpersonal nexus of persons, situations, and psychopathology. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 258–280.
411.
PincusA. L., SadlerP., WoodyE., RocheM. J., ThomasK. M., & WrightA. G. C. (2014). Multimethod assessment of interpersonal dynamics. In HopwoodC. J. & BornsteinR. F. (Eds.), Multimethod clinical assessment (pp. 51–91). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
412.
PinkhamA. E., PennD. L., GreenM. F., BuckB., HealeyK., & HarveyP. D. (2013). The social cognition psychometric evaluation study: Results of the expert survey and RAND panel. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 40(4), 813–823. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbt081
413.
PrzeworskiA., NewmanM. G., PincusA. L., KasoffM. B., YamasakiA.S., CastonguayL. G., & BerlinK. S. (2011). Interpersonal pathoplasticity in individuals with generalized anxiety disorder, Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 120, 286–298.
414.
Core TeamR. (2018). R: A language and environment for statistical computing [Computer software manual]. Vienna, Austria. Retrieved from https://www.R–project.org/
415.
RamN., ConroyD. E., PincusA. L., LorekA., RebarA., RocheM. J., ... GerstorfD. (2014). Examining the interplay of processes across multiple time–scales: Illustration with the Intraindividual Study of Affect, Health, and Interpersonal Behavior (iSAHIB). Research in Human Development, 11(2), 142–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427609.2014.906739
416.
RamN., & GerstorfD. (2009). Time–structured and net intraindividual variability: Tools for examining the development of dynamic characteristics and processes. Psychology and Aging, 24(4), 778–791. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017915
417.
RasmussenA. S., JørgensenC. R., O'ConnorM., BennedsenB. E., GodtK. D., BøyeR., & BerntsenD. (2017). The structure of past and future events in borderline personality disorder, eating disorder, and obsessive–compulsive disorder. Psychology of Consciousness: Theory, Research and Practice, 4, 190–210.
418.
RauthmannJ. F., Gallardo–PujolD., GuillaumeE. M., ToddE., NaveC. S., ShermanR. A., ... & FunderD. C. (2014). The situational eight DIAMONDS: A taxonomy of major dimensions of situation characteristics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107, 677–718.
419.
RauthmannJ.F., & ShermanR.A. (2016). Situation change: Stability and variation in situation variables between and within persons. Frontiers in Psychology (Section: Personality and Social Psychology), 6, 1938.
420.
RauthmannJ.F., & ShermanR.A. (2017). Normative and distinctive accuracy in situation perceptions: Magnitude and personality correlates. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8, 768–779.
421.
RauthmannJ.F., ShermanR.A., NaveC.S., & FunderD.C. (2015). Personality–driven situation experience, contact, and construal: How people's personality traits predict characteristics of their situations in daily life. Journal of Research in Personality, 55, 98–111.
422.
RawolleM., SchultheissM., & SchultheissO. C. (2013). Relationships between implicit motives, self–attributed motives, and personal goal commitments. Frontiers in Psychology, 4(923). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00923
423.
ReadS. J., DroutmanV., SmithB. J., & MillerL. C. (2017). Using neural networks as models of personality process: A tutorial. Personality and Individual Differences.
424.
ReadS. J., & MillerL. C. (2002). Virtual personalities: A neural network model of personality. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6(4), 357–369.
425.
ReadS. J., MonroeB. M., BrownsteinA. L., YangY., ChopraG., & MillerL. C. (2010). A neural network model of the structure and dynamics of human personality. Psychological Review, 117 (1), 61–92.
426.
ReadS. J., SmithB. J., DroutmanV., & MillerL. C. (2016). Virtual personalities: Using computational modeling to understand within–person variability. Journal of Research in Personality.
427.
ReardonK. W., TackettJ. L., & LynamD. (2018). The personality context of relational aggression: A five–factor model profile analysis. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 9, 228–238.
428.
ReichenbachH. (1938) Experience and prediction. An analysis of the foundations and the structure of knowledge (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
429.
RennebergB., HermK., HahnA., StaeblerK., LammersC. H., & RoepkeS. (2012). Perception of social participation in borderline personality disorder. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 19(6), 473–480. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.772
430.
RevelleW. (1986). Motivation and efficiency of cognitive performance. In Frontiers of motivational psychology (pp. 107–131). Springer.
RevelleW., & CondonD. (2015). A model for personality at three levels. Journal of Research in Personality, 56, 70–81.
433.
RichteringW. & SaundersB.R. (2014). Gel architectures and their complexity. Soft Matter, 10, 3695–3702.
434.
RidleyC. R., & JeffreyC. E. (2017). The conceptual framework of thematic mapping in case conceptualization. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 73(4), 376–392. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.22353
435.
RieseH., OrmelJ., AlemanA., ServaasM. N., & JeronimusB. F. (2015). Don't throw the baby out with the bathwater: Depressive traits are part and parcel of neuroticism. NeuroImage, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.11.012
RobertsB.W., HarmsP.D., Lodi–SmithJ., WoodD., & WebbM. (2006a). Using multiple methods in personality psychology. In EidM. & DienerE. (Eds.) Handbook of multimethod measurement in psychology (p. 321–335). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
RobertsB. W., KuncelN. R., ShinerR., CaspiA., & GoldbergL. R. (2007). The power of personality: The comparative validity of personality traits, socioeconomic status, and cognitive ability for predicting important life outcomes. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2(4), 313–345.
440.
RobertsB. W., LuoJ., BrileyD. A., ChowP. I., SuR., & HillP. L. (2017a). A systematic review of personality trait change through intervention. Psychological Bulletin, 143(2), 117–U122. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000088
441.
RobertsB. W., LuoJ., ChowD. A., SuR., & HillP. L. (2017b). A systematic review of personality trait change through intervention. Psychological Bulletin, 143, 117–141. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000088
442.
RobertsB. W. & NickelL. (2017). A critical evaluation of the neo–socioanalytic model of personality. In SpechtJ. (Ed.), Personality development across the life span (chapter 11). Elsevier.
443.
RobertsB. W., WaltonK. E., & ViechtbauerW. (2006b). Patterns of mean–level change in personality traits across the life course: A meta–analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 132(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033–2909.132.1.1
444.
RobinsR. W., FraleyR. C., & KruegerR. F. (2007a). Handbook of research methods in personality psychology. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
445.
RobinsR. W., NoftleE. E., & TracyJ. L. (2007b). Assessing self–conscious emotions: A review of self–report and nonverbal measures. In TracyJ. L., RobinsR. W., & TangneyJ. P. (Eds.), Self–conscious emotions: Theory and research (pp. 443–467). NY: Guilford Press.
446.
RocheM.J., JacobsonN.C., & PincusA.L. (2016). Using repeated daily assessments to uncover oscillating patterns and temporally–dynamic triggers in structures of psychopathology: Applications to the DSM–5 alternative model for personality disorders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 125, 1090–1002.
447.
RocheM.J., PincusA.L., HydeA.L., ConroyD.E., & RamN. (2013a). Within–person co–variation of agentic and communal perceptions: Implications for interpersonal theory and assessment. Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 445–552.
448.
RocheM. J., PincusA. L., ConroyD. E., HydeA. L., & RamN. (2013b). Pathological narcissism and interpersonal behavior in daily life. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 4, 315–323.
449.
RocheM.J., PincusA.L., RebarA.L., ConroyD.E., & RamN. (2014). Enriching psychological assessment using a person–specific analysis of interpersonal processes in daily life. Assessment, 21, 515–528.
450.
RodkinP. C., RyanA. M., JamisonR., & WilsonT. (2013). Social goals, social behavior, and social status in middle childhood. Developmental Psychology, 49(6), 1139–1150.
451.
RogersK. H., LeM., BuckelsE. E., KimM., & BiesanzJ. C. (2018). Face–to–face with everyday villains: Individual differences in the formation of accurate first impressions among people with dark personalities. Journal of Personality. Manuscript in press.
452.
Romero–CanyasR., DowneyG., BerensonK., AydukO., & KangN. J. (2010). Rejection sensitivity and the rejection–hostility link in romantic relationships. Journal of Personality, 78, 119–148.
453.
RonningstamE. (2011). Narcissistic personality disorder in DSM–5: In support of retaining a significant diagnosis. Journal of Personality Disorders, 25, 248–259.
454.
RossJ. M., GirardJ. M., WrightA. G., BeeneyJ. E., ScottL. N., HallquistM. N., ... & PilkonisP. A. (2017). Momentary patterns of covariation between specific affects and interpersonal behavior: Linking relationship science and personality assessment. Psychological Assessment, 29, 123–134.
455.
RubinK.H., BukowskiW., & BowkerJ. (2015). Children in peer groups. In LernerR. M. (Series Ed.) & BornsteinM. H. and LeventhalT. (Volume Eds.), Handbook of child psychology and developmental science (formerly the handbook of child psychology), vol. 4. Ecological settings and processes (7th edition, pp. 175–222). New York: Wiley.
456.
SadikajG., MoskowitzD. S., RussellJ. J., ZuroffD. C., & ParisJ. (2013). Quarrelsome behavior in borderline personality disorder: Influence of behavioral and affective reactivity to perceptions of others. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 122(1), 195–207.
457.
SadikajG., MoskowitzD.S., & ZuroffD.C. (2017). Intrapersonal variability in interpersonal perception in romantic relationships: Biases and accuracy. Journal of Research in Personality, 69, 67–77.
458.
SadikajG., MoskowitzD.S., & ZuroffD.C. (2015). Intrapersonal variability in negative affect as a moderator of accuracy and bias in interpersonal perception. Journal of Personality Disorders, 29(4), 468–485.
459.
SadikajG., MoskowitzD.S., & ZuroffD.C. (2018). What's interpersonal in interpersonal perception? The role of target's attachment and accuracy of perception. Journal of Personality, 86, 665–678.
460.
SadlerP., EthierN., GunnG. R., DuongD., & WoodyE. (2009). Are we on the same wavelength? Interpersonal complementarity as shared cyclical patterns during interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 1005–1020.
461.
SadlerP., & WoodyE. (2003). Is who you are who you're talking to? Interpersonal style and complementarity in mixed–sex interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 80–96.
462.
SaltheS. N. (1985). Evolving hierarchical systems: Their structure and representation. New York: Columbia University Press.
463.
SaltheS. N. (2009). A hierarchical framework for levels of reality: Understanding through representation. Axiomathes, 19, 87–99.
464.
SamuelD. B., SuzukiT., BucherM. A., & GriffinS. A. (2018). The agreement between clients’ and their therapists’ ratings of personality disorder traits. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 86(6), 546–555. https://doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000304.supp
465.
SamuelD. B., & WidigerT. A. (2004). Clinicians’ personality descriptions of prototypic personality disorders. Journal of Personality Disorders, 18(3), 286–308.
466.
SamuelD. B., & WidigerT. A. (2006). Clinicians’ judgments of clinical utility: A comparison of the DSM–IV and five–factor models. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 115(2), 298–308. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021–843X.115.2.298
467.
SamuelD. B., & WidigerT. A. (2011). Clinicians’ use of personality disorder models within a particular treatment setting: A longitudinal comparison of temporal consistency and clinical utility. Personality and Mental Health, 5(1), 12–28. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmh.152
468.
SarbinT.R. (1986). The narrative as a root metaphor for psychology. In SarbinT.R. (Ed.), Narrative psychology: The storied nature of human conduct (pp. 3–21). Westport, CT: Praeger.
469.
SaucierG., OstendorfF., & PeabodyD. (2001). The non–evaluative circumplex of personality adjectives. Journal of Personality, 69, 537–582.
470.
Sauer–ZavalaS., WilnerJ. G., & BarlowD. H. (2017). Addressing neuroticism in psychological treatment. Personality Disorders–Theory Research and Treatment, 8(3), 191–198. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000224
471.
SchillingO. K., & DiehlM. (2014). Reactivity to stressor pile–up in adulthood: Effects on daily negative and positive affect. Psychology and Aging, 29, 72–83. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035500
472.
SchmittM., GollwitzerM., BaumertA., BlumG. S., GschwendnerT., HofmannW., & RothmundT. (2013). Proposal of a nonlinear interaction of person and situation (NIPS) model. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 499.
473.
SchmittN. (1996). Uses and abuses of coefficient alpha. Psychological Assessment, 8, 350–353.
474.
SchonbrodtF. D., HumbergS., & NestlerS. (2018). Testing similarity effects with dyadic response surface analysis. Pre–print.
475.
SchroederM.L., WormworthJ.A., & LivesleyW.J. (1992). Dimensions of personality disorder and their relationships to the Big Five dimensions of personality. Psychological Assessment: A Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 4, 47–53.
476.
SchultheissO. C., & KöllnerM. G. (in press). Implicit motives. In JohnO. P. & RobinsR. W. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (4 ed.). New York: Guilford.
477.
SchultheissO. C., & Schiepe–TiskaA. (2013). The role of the dorsoanterior striatum in implicit motivation: The case of the need for power. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7(141). https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00141
478.
SchultheissO. C., RiebelK., & JonesN. M. (2009). Activity inhibition: A predictor of lateralized brain function during stress?Neuropsychology, 23, 392–404.
479.
SchultzW.T. (Ed). (2005). Handbook of psychobiography. New York: Oxford University Press.
480.
SharpC., & KalpakciA. (2015). Mentalization in borderline personality disorder: From bench to bedside. Personal Disord, 6(4), 347–355. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000106
481.
SharpC., & WallK. (2017). Personality pathology grows up: Adolescence as a sensitive period. Current Opinion in Psychology, 21, 111–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.11.010
482.
SharpC., VanwoerdenS., & WallK. (in press). Adolescence as a sensitive period for the development of personality pathology. The Psychiatric Clinics of North America
483.
SharpC., WrightA. G., FowlerJ. C., FruehB. C., AllenJ. G., OldhamJ., & ClarkL. A. (2015). The structure of personality pathology: Both general (‘g’) and specific (‘s’) factors?Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 124(2), 387–398. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000033
484.
ShedlerJ., BeckA., FonagyP., GabbardG. O., GundersonJ., KernbergO., ... WestenD. (2010). Personality disorders in DSM–5. American Journal of Psychiatry, 167(9), 1026–1028. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2010.10050746
485.
SherK. J. (2017). Integrating personality structures, process, and development is an important but daunting task. European Journal of Personality, 31, 565–567.
486.
ShermanR. A., NaveC. S., & FunderD. C. (2013). Situational construal is related to personality and gender. Journal of Research in Personality, 47(1), 1–14.
487.
ShinerR. L. (2014). The development of temperament and personality traits in childhood and adolescence. In MikulincerM., & ShaverP. (Eds.), CooperM. L., & LarsenR. (Associate Eds.), APA handbook of personality and social psychology: Vol. 3. Personality processes and individual differences (pp. 85–105). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
488.
ShinerR. L., & AllenT. A. (2013). Assessing personality disorders in adolescents: Seven guiding principles. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 20, 361–377.
489.
ShinerR. L., & AllenT. A. (2017). Developmental psychopathology of personality disorders. In LivesleyJ. & LarstoneR. (Eds.), Handbook of personality disorders: Theory, research, and treatment (2nd ed., pp. 309–323). New York: Guilford Press.
490.
ShinerR. L., & TackettJ. L. (2014). Personality disorders in children and adolescents. In MashE. J. & BarkleyR. A. (Eds.), Child psychopathology, 3rd Ed (pp. 848–896). New York: Guilford Press.
491.
ShodaY. & MischelW. (2000). Reconciling contextualism with the core assumptions of personality psychology. European Journal of Personality, 14, 407–428.
492.
ShodaY., MischelW., & WrightJ. C. (1994). Intraindividual stability in the organization and patterning of behavior: Incorporating psychological situations into the idiographic analysis of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 1023–1035. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022–3514.67.4.674
493.
SinghJ. K., MisraG., & De RaadB. (2013). Personality structure in the trait lexicon of Hindi, a major language spoken in India. European Journal of Personality, 27, 605–620.
494.
SkodolA.E. (2012). Personality disorders in DSM–5. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 8, 317–344.
495.
SkodolA.E. (2018). Impact of personality pathology on psychosocial functioning. Current Opinion in Psychology, 21, 33–38.
496.
SkodolA.E., MoreyL.C., BenderD.S., & OldhamJ.M. (2015). The alternative DSM–5 model for personality disorders: A clinical application. American Journal of Psychiatry, 172, 606–613.
497.
SkodolA.E., PaganoM.E., BenderD.S., SheaM.T., GundersonJ.G., YenS., … McGlashanT.H. (2005). Stability of functional impairment in patients with schizotypal, borderline, avoidant, or obsessive–compulsive personality disorder over two years. Psychological Medicine, 35, 443–451.
498.
SleepC.E., HyattC.S., LamkinJ., Maples–KellerJ.L., & MillerJ.D. (in press). Examining the relations among the DSM–5 alternative model of personality, the five–factor model, and externalizing and internalizing behavior. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment.
499.
SleepC. E., LamkinJ., LynamD. R., CampbellW. K., & MillerJ. D. (in press). Personality disorder traits: Testing insight regarding presence of traits, impairment, and desire for change. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment.
SmillieL. D., PickeringA. D., & JacksonC. J. (2006). The new reinforcement sensitivity theory: Implications for personality measurement. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10 (4), 320–335.
502.
SmithG. J. W. (1999). Trait and process in personality theory: Defined within two contemporary research traditions. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 40, 269–276.
503.
SotoC. J., & TackettJ. L. (2015). Personality traits in childhood and adolescence: Structure, development, and outcomes. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24, 358–362.
SpitzerR. L., WilliamsJ. B., & SkodolA. E. (1980). DSM–III: The major achievements and an overview. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 137, 151–164.
506.
SroufeL. A. (2005). Attachment and development: A prospective, longitudinal study from birth to adulthood. Attachment & Human Development, 7(4), 349–367.
507.
StantonS. J., HallJ. L., & SchultheissO. C. (2010). Properties of motive–specific incentives. In SchultheissO. C. & BrunsteinJ. C. (Eds.), Implicit motives (pp. 245–278). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
508.
SteinerJ. F. (2005). The use of stories in clinical research and health policy. Journal of the American Medical Association, 294(22), 2901–2904.
509.
StoeckartP. F., StrickM., BijleveldE., & AartsH. (2016). The implicit power motive predicts action selection. Psychological Research, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426–016–0768–z
510.
StoeckartP. F., StrickM., BijleveldE., & AartsH. (2018). The implicit power motive predicts decisions in line with perceived instrumentality. Motivation and Emotion, 42(3), 309–320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031–018–9687–1
511.
StruppH. H., & BinderJ. L. (1984). Psychotherapy in a new key: A guide to time–limited dynamic psychotherapy. New York: Basic Books.
512.
SullivanH. S. (1953). The interpersonal theory of psychiatry. New York, NY: Norton.
513.
TackettJ. L. (2011). Parent informants for child personality: Agreement, discrepancies, and clinical utility. Journal of Personality Assessment, 93, 539–544.
514.
TackettJ. L., HerzhoffK., KushnerS. C., & RuleN. (2016). Thin slices of child personality: Perceptual, situational, and behavioral contributions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110, 150–166.
515.
TackettJ. L., & SharpC. (2014). A developmental psychopathology perspective on personality disorder [Special issue]. Journal of Personality Disorders, 28(1).
516.
TedeschiR. G., & CalhounL. G. (2004). Posttraumatic growth: Conceptual foundations and empirical evidence. Psychological Inquiry, 15, 1–18.
517.
TedeschiR.G., Shakespeare–FinchJ., TakuK., & CalhounL.G. (2018). Posttraumatic growth: Theory, research and applications (1st ed.) New York, NY: Routledge.
518.
TellegenA. (1993). Folk concepts and psychological concepts of personality and personality disorder. Psychological Inquiry, 4, 122–130.
519.
TennenH., & AffleckG. (2009). Assessing positive life change: In search of meticulous methods. In ParkC. L., LechnerS. C., AntoniM. H., & StantonA. L. (Eds.), Medical illness and positive life change: Can crisis lead to personal transformation? (pp. 31–49). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
520.
ThelenE., & SmithL. B. (1994). A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action. Cambridge, MA: Bradford/MIT Press.
521.
ThomasK. M., HopwoodC. J., WoodyE., EthierN. & SadlerP. (2014). Momentary assessment of interpersonal process in psychotherapy. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 61, 1–14.
522.
ThomasW. I., & ThomasD. S. (1928). The child in America: Behavior problems and programs. New York: Knopf.
523.
TimmonsA. C., & PreacherK. J. (2015). The importance of temporal design: How do measurement intervals affect the accuracy and efficiency of parameter estimates in longitudinal research?Multivariate Behavioral Research, 50, 41–55.
524.
TomaszewskiT. (1967). AktywnoscÅL człowieka [Human activity]. In MaruszewskiT., ReykowskiJ. & TomaszewskiT. (Eds.), Psychologia jako nauka o człowieku (pp. 219–278). Warsaw: Książka i Wiedza.
TripathiR., CervoneD., & SavaniK (2018). Are the motivational effects of autonomy universal? Contrasting results among Indian and American corporate professionals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.
527.
TrobstK. K. (2000). An interpersonal conceptualization and quantification of social support transactions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 971–986.
528.
TrullT. J., LaneS. P., KovalP., & Ebner–PriemerU. W. (2015). Affective dynamics in psychopathology. Emotion Review, 7(4), 355–361. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073915590617
529.
TyrerP., CrawfordM., MulderR., BlashfieldR. F., FarnamA., FoasstiA., …. ReedG. M. (2011). The rationale for the reclassification of personality disorder in the 11th revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD–11). Personality and Mental Health, 5, 246–259.
530.
UherJ. (2015). Interpreting “personality” taxonomies: Why previous models cannot capture individual–specific experiencing, behaviour, functioning and development. Major taxonomic tasks still lay ahead. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 49, 600–655.
531.
van RoekelE., HeiningaV. E., VrijenC., SnippeE., & OldehinkelA. J. (2018). Reciprocal associations between positive emotions and motivation in daily life: Network analyses in anhedonic individuals and healthy controls. Emotionhttps://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000424
532.
VazireS. (2010). Who knows what about a person? The self–other knowledge asymmetry (SOKA) model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(2), 281–300. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017908
533.
VenablesN. C., HallJ. R., & PatrickC. J. (2014). Differentiating psychopathy from antisocial personality disorder: A triarchic model perspective. Psychological Medicine, 44, 1005–1013.
534.
VizeC. E., CollisonK. L., CroweM., CampbellW. K., MillerJ. D., & LynamD. R. (in press). Evaluating the relative importance of narcissistic traits in relation to aggression and externalizing outcomes. Assessment
535.
VollhardtJ. R. (2009). Altruism born of suffering and prosocial behavior following adverse life events: A review and conceptualization. Social Justice Research, 22(1), 53–97.
536.
von BertalanffyL. (1968). Organismic psychology and systems theory. Worcester, MA: Clark University Press.
537.
VrabelJ. K., Zeigler–HillV., & SouthardA. C. (2018). Self–esteem and envy: Is state self–esteem instability associated with the benign and malicious forms of envy. Personality and Individual Differences, 123, 100–104.
538.
WachtelP. L. (1977). Psychoanalysis and behavior therapy: Toward an integration. New York: Basic Books.
539.
WachtelP. L. (1994). Cyclical processes in personality and psychopathology. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 103, 51–54.
540.
WagermanS.A., & FunderD.C. (2009). Situations. In CorrP.J. and MatthewsG. (eds.), Cambridge handbook of personality (pp. 27–42). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
541.
WakefieldJ. C. (1992). The concept of mental disorder: On the boundary between biological facts and social values. American Psychologist, 47(3), 373–388. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003–066X.47.3.373
542.
WangS., RocheM. J., PincusA. L., ConroyD. E., RebarA. L., & RamN. (2014a). Interpersonal dependency and emotion in everyday life. Journal of Research in Personality, 53, 5–12.
543.
WangJ., LiuL., & YanJ. H. (2014b). Implicit power motive effects on the ERP processing of emotional intensity in anger faces. Journal of Research in Personality, 50, 90–97.
544.
WatsonD. (2006). Commentary on Krueger: Traits versus types in the classification of personality pathology. In WidigerT. A., SimonsenE., SirovatkaP. J., & RegierD. A. (Eds.), Dimensional models of personality disorders: Refining the research agenda for DSM–V (pp. 167–170). Arlington, VA, USA: American Psychiatric Association.
545.
WatsonD., Ellickson–LarewS., StantonK., & Levin–AspensonH. (2016). Personality provides a general structural framework for psychopathology: Commentary on “Translational Applications of Personality Science for the Conceptualization and Treatment of Psychopathology”. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 23, 309–313. https://doi.org/10.1111/cpsp.12164
546.
WatsonD., NusE., & WuK. D. (2017). Development and validation of the faceted inventory of the five–factor model (FI–FFM). Assessment. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191117711022
547.
WaughM. H., HopwoodC. J., KruegerR. F., MoreyL. C., PincusA. L., & WrightA. G. C. (2017). Psychological assessment with the DSM–5 alternative model for personality disorders: Tradition and innovation. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 48, 79–89. https://doi.org/10.1037/pro0000071
548.
WestT. V., & KennyD. A. (2011). The truth and bias model of judgment. Psychological Review, 118, 357–378.
549.
WidigerT. A., BachB., ChmielewskiM., ClarkL. A., DeYoungC., HopwoodC. J., … & ThomasK. M. (in press). Criterion A of the AMPD in HiTOP. Journal of Personality Assessment
550.
WidigerT. A., GoreW. L., CregoC., RojasS. L., & OltmannsJ. R. (2017). Five factor model and personality disorder. In WidigerT. A. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of the five factor model (pp. 449–478). New York: Oxford University Press.
551.
WidigerT. A., & McCabeG. A. (2018). The five factor model is a competing theory of borderline personality disorder. Journal of Personality Disorders, 32, 180–183.
552.
WidigerT. A., & PresnallJ. R. (2013). Clinical application of the five–factor model. Journal of Personality, 81(6), 515–527. https://doi.org/10.1111/Jopy.12004
553.
WidigerT. A., & SamuelD. B. (2005). Diagnostic categories or dimensions? A question for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders—Fifth Edition. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 114, 494–504. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021–843X.114.4.494
554.
WigginsJ. S. (1979). A psychological taxonomy of trait–descriptive terms: The interpersonal domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 395–412.
555.
WigginsJ. S. (1995). Interpersonal adjective scales: Professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
556.
WigginsJ. S. (1996). An informal history of the interpersonal circumplex tradition. Journal of Personality Assessment, 66, 217–233.
557.
WigginsJ. S. (2003). Paradigms of personality assessment. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
558.
WigginsJ.S., & PincusA.L. (1989). Conceptions of personality disorders and dimensions of personality. Psychological Assessment, 1, 305–316.
559.
WigginsJ.S., & TrapnellP.D. (1996). A dyadic–interactional perspective on the five–factor model. In J.S.
560.
WigginsJ. S., & TrobstK. K. (1999). The fields of interpersonal behavior. In PervinL. A. & JohnO. P. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2 ed., pp. 653–670). New York: Guilford.
561.
WilkowskiB. M., RobinsonM. D., & MeierB. P. (2006). Agreeableness and the prolonged spatial processing of antisocial and prosocial information. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 1152–1168.
562.
WilsonD., & SperberD. (2012). Meaning and relevance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
563.
WilsonT. D. (2009). Know thyself. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 384–389.
564.
WinterD. G. (1999). Linking personality and “scientific” psychology: The development of empirically derived Thematic Apperception Test measures. In GieserL. & SteinM. I. (Eds.), Evocative images: The thematic apperception test and the art of projection (pp. 107–124). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
565.
WittgensteinL. (1953). Philosophical investigations (English Translation by G. E. M. Anscombe). Oxford, U.K.: Basil Blackwell.
566.
WolpertL., (1992). The unnatural nature of science. London; Faber & Faber,
567.
WoodD., GardnerM. H., & HarmsP. (2015). How functionalist and process approaches to behavior can explain trait covariation. Psychological Review, 122, 84–111. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038423
568.
WoodD., LowmanG., HarmsP. D., & SpainS. M. (2017). Using functional fields to formally represent the meaning and logic of actions: A worked example using ‘dark’ actions. Personality and Individual Differences
569.
WoodD., SpainS. M., & HarmsP. D. (in press). Functional approaches to representing the interplay of situations, traits, and behavior. In RauthmannJ. F., FunderD. C. & ShermanR. A. (Eds.), Handbook of psychological situations. New York: Oxford.
570.
WoodD., SpainS. M., MonroeB. M., & HarmsP. D. (2018). Constructing functional fields to represent the interplay of situations, persons, and behaviors. University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL.
571.
WoodW., & RüngerD. (2016). Psychology of habit. Annual Review of Psychology, 67, 289–314.
572.
World Health Organization. (1946). Constitution of the World Health Organization. International Health Conference held in New York from 19 June to 22 July 1946, signed on 22 July 1946 by the representatives of 61 States (Off. Rec. Wld Hlth Org., 2, 100).
573.
World Health Organization (2018). International Classification of Diseases, version 11 for mortality and morbidity (ICD–11 MMS). Available at https://icd.who.int/
574.
WrightS. (1934). The method of path coefficients. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 5, 161–215.
575.
WrightA.G.C. (2014). Integrating trait and process based conceptualizations of pathological narcissism in the DSM–5 era. In BesserA. (Ed.) Handbook of psychology of narcissism: Diverse perspectives (pp. 153–174). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers.
576.
WrightA.G.C., GatesK.M., ArizmendiC., LaneS.T., **WoodsW.C., & **EdershileE.A. (in press). Focusing personality assessment on the person: Modeling general, shared, and person specific processes in personality and psychopathology. Psychological Assessment
577.
WrightA. G. C., HallquistM. N., MorseJ. Q., ScottL. N., SteppS. D., NolfK. A., & PilkonisP. A. (2013). Clarifying interpersonal heterogeneity in borderline personality disorder using latent mixture modeling. Journal of Personality Disorders, 27, 125–143. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2013.27.2.125
578.
WrightA. G. C., HallquistM. N., SteppS. D., ScottL. N., BeeneyJ. E., LazarusS. A., & PilkonisP. A. (2016a). Modeling heterogeneity in momentary interpersonal and affective dynamic processes in borderline personality disorder. Assessment, 23(4), 484–495.
579.
WrightA.G., HopwoodC.J., SkodolA.E., & MoreyL.C. (2016b). Longitudinal validation of general and specific structural features of personality pathology. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 125, 1120–1134.
580.
WrightA. G., PincusA. L., HopwoodC. J., ThomasK. M., MarkonK. E., & KruegerR. F. (2012). An interpersonal analysis of pathological Wright, A. G. C., & Simms, L. J. (2016). Stability and fluctuation of personality disorder features in daily life. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 125(5), 641–656.
581.
WrightA.G.C., & SimmsL.J. (2016). Stability and fluctuation of personality disorder features in daily life. Journal of Abnormal Psychology125(5), 641–656.
582.
WrightA. G., SteppS. D., ScottL. N., HallquistM. N., BeeneyJ. E., LazarusS. A., & PilkonisP. A. (2017). The effect of pathological narcissism on interpersonal and affective processes in social interactions. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 126, 898–910.
583.
WrightA. G. C., & ZimmermannJ. (in press). Applied ambulatory assessment: Integrating idiographic and nomothetic principles of measurement. Psychological Assessment
584.
WrzusC. (2018). Processes of personality development: An update of the TESSERA framework. In RauthmannJ. (Ed.), The handbook of personality dynamics and processes (pp. nn): Elsevier.
585.
WrzusC., LuongG., WagnerG. G., & RiedigerM. (2015). Can't get it out of my head: Age differences in affective responsiveness vary with preoccupation and elapsed time after daily hassles. Emotion, 15, 257–269. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000019
586.
WrzusC., & RobertsB. W. (2017). Processes of personality development in adulthood: The TESSERA framework. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 21, 253–277. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868316652279
587.
WrzusC., WagnerG. G., & RiedigerM. (2016). Personality–situation–transactions from adolescence to old age. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110, 782–799. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000054
588.
WurstS. N., GerlachT. M., DufnerM., RauthmannJ. F., GroszM. P., KüfnerA. C. P., … BackM. D. (2017). Narcissism and romantic relationships: The differential impact of narcissistic admiration and rivalry. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112, 280–306.
589.
YarkoniT. (2015). Neurobiological substrates of personality: A critical overview. APA handbook of personality and social psychology, 4, 61–83.
590.
YikM. (2009). Studying affect among the Chinese: The circular way. Journal of Personality Assessment, 91, 416–428.
591.
YikM. (2010). Affect and interpersonal behaviors: Where do the circumplexes meet?Journal of Research in Personality, 44, 721–728.
592.
YikM., & RussellJ. A. (2004). On the relationship between circumplexes: Affect and Wiggins’ IAS. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 203–230.
593.
YikM., RussellJ. A., & SteigerJ. H. (2011). A 12–point circumplex model of core affect. Emotion, 11, 705–731.
594.
YoungJ. E., & BrownG. (1994). Young schema questionnaire. In: YoungJ. E. (Ed.), Cognitive therapy for personality disorders: A schema–focused approach, (2nd Ed.). Sarasota: Professional Resource Press/Professional Resource Exchange, pp. 63–76.
595.
YoungJ. E., KloskoJ. S., & WeishaarM. E. (2003). Schema therapy: A practitioner's guide. New York: The Guilford Press.
596.
ZanariniM.C., FrankenburgF.R., ReichD.B., & FitzmauriceG. (2012). Attainment and stability of sustained symptomatic remission and recovery among patients with borderline personality disorder and Axis II comparison subjects: A 16–year prospective follow–up. American Journal of Psychiatry, 169, 476–483.
597.
ZanariniM.C., FrankenburgF.R., ReichD.B., & FitzmauriceG.M. (2016). Fluidity of the subsyndromal phenomenology of borderline personality disorder over 16 years of prospective follow–up. American Journal of Psychiatry, 173, 688–694.
598.
Zeigler–HillV., & TromblyD. R. C. (2018). Narcissism and mate value: Is beauty in the eye of the narcissistic beholder?Personality and Individual Differences, 122, 115–119.
599.
Zeigler–HillV., VrabelJ. K., McCabeG. A., CosbyC. A., TraederC. K., HobbsK. A., & SouthardA. C. (in press). Narcissism and the pursuit of status. Journal of Personality
600.
ZimmermannJ., BeneckeC., BenderD. S., SkodolA. E., SchauenburgH., CierpkaM., & LeisingD. (2014). Assessing DSM–5 level of personality functioning from videotaped clinical interviews: A pilot study with untrained and clinically inexperienced students. Journal of Personality Assessment, 96, 397–409.
601.
ZimmermannJ., EhrenthalJ. C., CierpkaM., SchauenburgH., DoeringS., & BeneckeC. (2012). Assessing the level of structural integration using operationalized psychodynamic diagnosis (OPD): Implications for DSM–5. Journal of Personality Assessment, 94, 522–532.
602.
ZimmermannJ., WoodsW. C., RitterS., HappelM., MasuhrO., JaegerU., ... & WrightA. G. (in press). Integrating structure and dynamics in personality assessment: First steps toward the development and validation of a personality dynamics diary. Psychological Assessment