AsendorpfJ. B., BaumertA., SchmittM., BlumG., van BorkR., RhemtullaM., BorsboomD., … MõttusR. (2016). Open peer commentary and author's response. European Journal of Personality, 30, 304–340.
2.
AsendorpfJ. B., & Motti–StefanidiF. (2018). Mediated disposition–environment Transactions: The DAE Model. European Journal of Personality, 32, 167–185.
3.
BaumertA., SchmittM., PeruginiM., JohnsonW., BlumG., BorkenauP., CostantiniG., … WrzusC. (2017). Integrating personality structure, personality process, and personality development. European Journal of Personality, 31, 503–528. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2115.
4.
BleidornW., HuferA., KandlerC., HopwoodC. J., & RiemannR. (2018). A nuclear twin family study of self–esteem. European Journal of Personality, 32, 221–232.
5.
BlumG. S., RauthmannJ. F., GöllnerR., LischetzkeT., & SchmittM. (2018). The nonlinear interaction of person and situation (NIPS) model: Theory and empirical evidence. European Journal of Personality, 32, 286–305.
6.
BrileyD., LivengoodJ., & DerringerJ. (2018). Behaviour genetic frameworks of causal reasoning for personality psychology. European Journal of Personality, 32, 202–220.
7.
CostantiniG., & PeruginiM. (2018). A framework for testing causality in personality research. European Journal of Personality, 32, 254–268.
8.
McCraeR. R., & SutinA. R. (2018). A five–factor theory perspective on causal analysis. European Journal of Personality, 32, 151–166.
9.
MõttusR. (2016). Towards more rigorous personality trait–outcome research. European Journal of Personality, 30, 292–303.
10.
SeebothA., & MõttusR. (2018). Successful explanations start with accurate descriptions: Questionnaire items as personality markers for more accurate predictions. European Journal of Personality, 32, 186–201.
11.
SenedH., LazarusG., GleasonM. E. J., RafaeliE., & FleesonW. (2018). The use of intensive longitudinal methods in explanatory personality research. European Journal of Personality, 32, 269–285.
12.
YarkoniT., & WestfallJ. (2017). Choosing prediction over explanation in psychology: Lessons from machine learning. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12, 1100–1122. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617693393.
13.
Zapko–WillmesA., RiemannR., & KandlerC. (2018). Unravelling quasi–causal environmental effects via phenotypic and genetically informed multi–rater models: The case of differential parenting and authoritarianism. European Journal of Personality, 32, 233–253.
14.
ZygarC., HagemeyerB., PuschS., & SchönbrodtF. D. (2018). From motive dispositions to states to outcomes: An intensive experience sampling study on communal motivational dynamics in couples. European Journal of Personality, 32, 306–324.
