BackM. D., BaumertA., DenissenJ. J. A., HartungF.–M., PenkeL., SchmukleS. C., … WrzusC. (2011). PERSOC: A unified framework for understanding the dynamic interplay of personality and social relationships. European Journal of Personality, 25, 90–107.
2.
BernardoA. B. I. (2009). Exploring the links between social axioms and the epistemological beliefs about learning held by Filipino students. In LeungK., & BondM. H. (Eds.), Psychological aspects of social axioms: Understanding global belief systems (pp. 163–176). New York: Springer.
3.
BondM. H. (1988). Finding universal dimensions of individual variation in multi–cultural studies of value. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 1009–1015.
4.
BondM. H. (2009). Believing in beliefs: A scientific but personal quest. In LeungK., & BondM. H. (Eds.), Psychological aspects of social axioms: Understanding global belief systems (pp. 319–342). New York: Springer.
5.
BondM. H. (2013). A general model for explaining situational influence on individual social behavior: Refining Lewin's formula. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 16, 1–15.
6.
BondM. H., & LeungK. (2009). Cultural mapping of beliefs about the world and their application to a social psychology involving culture: Futurescaping. In WyerR. S., ChiuC.–Y., & HongY.–Y. (Eds.), Understanding culture: Theory, research, and application (pp. 109–126). New York: Psychology Press.
7.
BondM. H., LeungK., AuA., TongK. K., de CarrasquelS. R., MurakamiF., … LewisJ. R. (2004). Culture–level dimensions of social axioms and their correlates across 41 cultures. Journal of Cross–Cultural Psychology, 35, 548–570.
8.
BondM. H., LeungK., & SchwartzS. (1992). Explaining choices in procedural and distributive justice across cultures. International Journal of Psychology, 27, 211–225.
9.
BoskiP., Bittas–HenneM., & WieckowskaJ. (2009). Cynicism in love and in politics. In LeungK., & BondM. H. (Eds.), Psychological aspects of social axioms: Understanding global belief systems (pp. 239–268). New York: Springer.
10.
BouchardG., LussierY., & SabourinS. (1999). Personality and marital adjustment: Utility of the Five–Factor Model of personality. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 651–660.
11.
BradburyT. N., FinchamF. D., & BeachS. R. H. (2000). Research on the nature and determinants of marital satisfaction: A decade in review. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 964–980.
12.
BussD. M., AbbottM., AngleitnerA., BiaggioA., Blanco–VillasenorA., Bruchon–SchweitzerM., … YanK.–S. (1990). International preferences in selecting mates: A study of 37 cultures. Journal of Cross–Cultural Psychology, 21, 5–47.
13.
ChenS. X., BondM. H., & CheungF. M. (2006). Personality correlates of social axioms: Are beliefs nested within personality?Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 509–519.
14.
ChenS. X., FokH. K., BondM. H., & MatsumotoD. (2006). Personality and beliefs about the world revisited: Expanding the nomological network of social axioms. Personality and Individual Differences, 41, 201–211.
15.
CheungF. M., LeungK., FanR. M., SongW. Z., ZhangJ. X., & ZhangJ. P. (1996). Development of the Chinese Personality Assessment Inventory. Journal of Cross–Cultural Psychology, 27, 181–199.
16.
ComunianA. L. (2009). Social axioms in Italian culture: Relationship with locus of control and moral development. In LeungK., & BondM. H. (Eds.), Psychological aspects of social axioms: Understanding global belief systems (pp. 269–282). New York: Springer.
17.
CostaP. T., & McCraeR. R. (1992). NEO PI–R professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
18.
DavidD., IliescuD., MatuS., & BalasziR. (2015). The national psychological/personality profile of Romanians: An in depth analysis of the regional national psychological/personality profile of Romanians. Romanian Journal of Applied Psychology, 17, 34–44.
19.
DincaM., & IliescuD. (2009). Linking axioms with behavioral indicators and personality in Romania. In LeungK., & BondM. H. (Eds.), Psychological aspects of social axioms: Understanding global belief systems (pp. 145–162). New York: Springer.
20.
DonnellanM. B., CongerR. D., & BryantC. M. (2004). The Big Five and enduring marriages. Journal of Research in Personality, 38, 481–504.
21.
GattisK. S., BernsS., SimpsonL. E., & ChristensenA. (2004). Birds of a feather or strange birds? Ties among personality dimensions, similarity, and marital quality. Journal of Family Psychology, 18, 564–574.
22.
GebauerJ. E., BleidornW., GoslingS. D., RentfrowP. J., LambM. E., & PotterJ. (2015). Cross–cultural variations in Big Five relationships with religiosity: A sociocultural motives perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107, 1064–1091.
23.
GuanY., BondM. H., DincaM., & IliescuD. (2010). Social axioms among Romanians: Structure and demographic differences. Romanian Journal of Applied Psychology, 12, 48–53.
24.
HaynesS. N., & LenchH. (2003). Incremental validity of new clinical assessment measures. Psychological Assessment, 15, 456–466.
25.
HuiC. M., & HuiN. H. H. (2009). The mileage from social axioms: Learning from the past and looking forward. In LeungK., & BondM. H. (Eds.), Psychological aspects of social axioms (pp. 13–30). New York: Springer.
26.
HuiV. K. Y., BondM. H., & NgT. S. W. (2007). General beliefs about the world as defensive mechanisms against death anxiety. Omega, 54, 199–214.
IspasD., IliescuD., IlieA., & JohnsonR. E. (2014). Exploring the cross–cultural generalizability of the Five–Factor Model of Personality: The Romanian NEO PI–R. Journal of Cross–Cultural Psychology, 47, 1074–1088.
30.
KarneyB. R., & BradburyT. N. (1995). The longitudinal course of marital quality and stability: A review of theory, methods, and research. Psychological Bulletin, 1, 3–34.
31.
KeungD. K. Y., & BondM. H. (2002). Dimensions of political attitudes and their relations with beliefs and values in Hong Kong. Journal of Psychology in Chinese Societies, 3, 133–154.
32.
LaiJ. H.–W., BondM. H., & HuiN. H.–H. (2007). The role of social axioms in predicting life satisfaction: A longitudinal study in Hong Kong. Journal of Happiness Studies, 8, 517–535.
33.
LeungK., & BondM. H. (2004). Social axioms: A model for social beliefs in multi–cultural perspective. In ZannaM. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 122–199), 36. San Diego, CA: Elsevier/Academic Press.
34.
LeungK., BondM. H., de CarrasquelS. H., MuñozC., HernándezM., MurakamiF., YamaguchiS., … SingelisT. M. (2002). Social axioms: The search for universal dimensions of general beliefs about how the world functions. Journal of Cross–Cultural Psychology, 33, 286–302.
35.
LeungK., BondM. H., & SchwartzS. H. (1995). How to explain cross–cultural differences: Values, valences and expectancies?Asian Journal of Psychology, 1, 70–75.
36.
LeungM. C., HuiC. M., & BondM. H. (2007). Does our worldview guide our explanations for daily success and failures? Linking social axioms to attributional style. Unpublished manuscript, Chinese University of Hong Kong.
37.
LeungK., LamB. C. P., BondM. H., ConwayL. G.III, GornickL. J., AmponsahB., … ZhouF. (2012). Developing and evaluating the Social Axioms Survey in eleven countries: Its relationship with the Five–Factor Model of personality. Journal of Cross–Cultural Psychology, 43, 833–857.
38.
MalouffJ. M., ThorsteinssonE. B., SchutteN. S., BhullarN., & RookeS. E. (2010). The Five–Factor Model of personality and relationship satisfaction of intimate partners: A meta–analysis. Journal of Research in Personality, 44, 124–127.
39.
MickelsonK. D., ClaffeyS. T., & WilliamsS. L. (2006). The moderating role of gender and gender role attitudes on the link between spousal support and well–being. Sex Roles, 55, 73–82.
40.
OcejaL. (2009). Processes of transmission and change of social axioms and their behavioral influence in Spanish culture. In LeungK., & BondM. H. (Eds.), Psychological aspects of social axioms: Understanding global belief systems (pp. 129–141). New York: Springer.
41.
SafdarS., LewisJ. R., & DaneshpourM. (2006). Social axioms in Iran and Canada: Intercultural contact, coping and adjustment. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 9, 123–131.
42.
SantistebanD. A., Muir–MalcolmJ. A., MitraniV. B., & SzapocznikJ. (2002). Integrating the study of ethnic culture and family psychology intervention science. In LiddleH. A., SantistebanD. A., LevantR. F., RonaldF., & BrayJ. H. (Eds.), Family psychology: Science–based interventions (pp. 331–351). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
43.
SchaffhuserK., AllemandM., & MartinM. (2014). Personality traits and relationship satisfaction in intimate couples: Three perspectives on personality. European Journal of Personality, 28, 120–133.
44.
SchaffhuserK., WagnerJ., LudtkeO., & AllemandM. (2014). Dyadic longitudinal interplay between personality and relationship satisfaction: A focus on neuroticism and self–esteem. Journal of Research in Personality, 53, 124–133.
45.
SchmidtF. L., & HunterJ. E. (1998). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 262–274.
46.
SingelisT. M., BhawukD. P. S., GabrenyaW. K., GelfandM., HarwoodJ., HerP., … VandelloJ. (2009). Exploring ethnic group and geographic differences in social axioms in the USA. In LeungK., & BondM. H. (Eds.), Psychological aspects of social axioms: Understanding global belief systems (pp. 81–93). New York: Springer.
47.
SingelisT. M., HubbardC., HerP., & AnS. (2003). Convergent validation of the Social Axioms Survey. Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 269–282.
48.
SpanierG. B. (2001). Dyadic Adjustment Scale, user's manual. Toronto, ON: Multi–Health Systems.
49.
SpanierG. B., IliescuD., & PetreL. (2009). Scala de adaptare in cuplu: Manual tehnic [Dyadic Adjustment Scale: Technical manual]. Cluj–Napoca: Sinapsis.
50.
TorgersenS. (1995). Personality and personality disorders. Oslo, Norway: Universitetsforlaget.
Van de VijverA. J. R. (2016). The cross–cultural perspective in Romanian psychology. Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Braşov, 9, 8–14.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
