Al–ShawafL., Conroy–BeamD., AsaoK., & BussD. M. (2016). Human emotions: An evolutionary psychological perspective. Emotion Review, 8, 173–186.
2.
AlbuquerqueI., LimaM. P., MatosM., & FigueiredoC. (2013). The interplay among levels of personality: The mediator effect of personal projects between the Big Five and subjective well–being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14(1), 235–250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902–012–9326–6.
3.
AllenT. A., & DeYoungC. G. (2016). Personality neuroscience and the Five Factor Model. In WidigerT. A. (Ed.), Oxford handbook of the Five Factor Model (pp. 319–349). New York: Oxford University Press.
4.
AllikJ., & McCraeR. R. (2002). A Five–Factor Theory perspective. In McCraeR. R. & AllikJ. (Eds.), The Five Factor Model of personality across cultures (pp. 303–322). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
5.
AllikJ., & RealoA. (2017). Universal and specific in the five–factor model of personality. In WidigerT. A. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of the Five Factor Model of Personality (pp. 175–190). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6.
AllikJ., de VriesR. E., & RealoA. (2016). Why are moderators of self–other agreement difficult to establish?Journal of Research in Personality, 63, 72–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2016.05.013
7.
AllportG. W. (1937). Personality: A psychological interpretation. New York: Holt.
8.
AllportG. W. (1958). What units shall we employ? In LindzeyG. (Ed.), Assessment of human motives (pp. 239–260). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
9.
AllportG. W. (1968). The person in psychology: Selected essays. Beacon Press.
10.
American Psychiatric Association (1980). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. (3rd ed.) Washington DC: Authors.
11.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
12.
AndersonJ. R. (1991). The adaptive nature of human categorization. Psychological Review, 98, 409–429.
13.
AquinoK., FreemanD., ReedA.II, LimV. K. G., & FelpsW. (2009). Testing a social–cognitive model of moral behavior: The interactive influence of situations and moral identity centrality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 123–141.
14.
ArmstrongP. I., DayS. X., McVayJ. P., RoundsJ. (2008). Holland's RIASEC model as an integrative framework for individual differences. Journal of Counseling Psychology55 (1), 1–18.
15.
ArtisticoR. & RothenbergA. M. (2013). Assessing strengths and weaknesses in solving work problems: A Knowledge and Appraisal Personality Architecture (KAPA) analysis of the trait conscientiousness and self–efficacy. International Journal of Psychological Studies, 5, 84–97.
16.
AsendorpfJ. B. (1995). Persönlichketispsychologie: Das empirische Studium individueller Besonderheiten aus spezieller und differentieller Perspektive [psychology of personality: The empirical study of human individuality from a special and from a differential perspective]. Psychologische Rundschau, 46, 235–247.
17.
AsendorpfJ. B. (2015). Person–centered approaches to personality. In CooperM. L. & LarsenR. J. (Eds.), Handbook of personality processes and individual differences (Vol. 4, pp. 403–424). Washington, D. C.: American Psychological Association.
18.
AungerR., & CurtisV. (2013). The anatomy of motivation: An evolutionary–ecological approach. Biological Theory, 8, 49–63.
19.
BackM. D. & VazireS. (2012). Knowing our personality. In VazireS. and WilsonT. D. (Eds.) Handbook of self knowledge (pp. 131–156). New York: Guilford
20.
BackM. D., & NestlerS., (2016). Accuracy of judging personality. In HallJ. A., Schmid MastM., & WestT. V. (Eds.). The social psychology of perceiving others accurately (pp. 98–124). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
21.
BackM. D., BaumertA., DenissenJ. J. A., HartungF.–M., PenkeL., SchmukleS. C., ... WrzusC. (2011). PERSOC: A unified framework for understanding the dynamic interplay of personality and social relationships. European Journal of Personality, 25, 90–107.
22.
BanduraA. (1977). Self–efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215.
23.
BanduraA., & CervoneD. (1983). Self–evaluative and self–efficacy mechanisms governing the motivational effects of goal systems.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 1017–1028.
24.
BarlowD. H., Sauer–ZavalaS., CarlJ. R., BullisJ. R., & EllardK. K. (2014). The nature, diagnosis, and treatment of neuroticism: Back to the future. Clinical Psychological Science, 2, 344–365.
25.
BarnesG. E. (1983). Clinical and prealcoholic personality characteristics. In KissinB. & BegleiterH. (Eds.), The biology of alcoholism (pp. 113–195). Springer US.
26.
BaronR. M., & KennyD. A. (1986). The moderator mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022–3514.51.6.1173
27.
BaumertA., SchmittM. & BlumG. (2016). Beware of indirect effects. Rigorous definitions and methods for testing the causality of traits. European Journal of Personality, 30, 305–307.
28.
BeckA. (1991). Cognitive therapy: A 30–year retrospective. American Psychologist, 46, 368–375.
29.
BeckA. T., FreemanA., & DavisD. D. (2004). Cognitive therapy of personality disorders (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
30.
BeckE. D., & JacksonJ. J. (2017a). A tale of two stabilities: A longitudinal ESM study of dynamic personality networks. Unsubmitted manuscript
31.
BeckE. D., & JacksonJ. J. (2017b). Do changes in personality imply changes in behavior? A longitudinal ESM study. Unsubmitted manuscript
32.
BeckE. D., JacksonJ. J., & CondonD. M. (2017). Personality network development from 14 to 80. Unsubmitted manuscript
33.
BerensonK. R., DowneyG., RafaeliE., CoifmanK. G., & PaquinN. L. (2011). The rejection–rage contingency in borderline personality disorder. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 120(3), 681–690.
34.
BleidornW., HopwoodC. J., & LucasR. E. (2016). Life events and personality trait change. Journal of Personality. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12286
35.
BorsboomD., & CramerA. O. J. (2013). Network analysis: An integrative approach to the structure of psychopathology. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 9, 91–121.
36.
BouchardT. J. (1997). Experience producing drive theory: How genes drive experience and shape personality. Acta Paediatrica, 86(S422), 60–64.
37.
BrackettM. A., & MayerJ. D. (2007). The life space: A framework and method to describe the individual's external traits. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 26(1–2), 3–41. https://doi.org/10.2190/8380–1676–H338–N217
38.
BrennerC. (1973). An elementary textbook of psychoanalysis. New York, NY: Anchor Press.
39.
BrileyD. A. & Tucker–DrobE. M. (2017). Comparing the developmental genetics of cognition and personality over the life span. Journal of Personality, 85, 51–64.
40.
BrileyD. A., & Tucker–DrobE. M. (2014). Genetic and environmental continuity in personality development: A meta–analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 140, 1303–1331.
BrownC. R. & BrownM. B. (2000). Heritable basis for choice of group size in a colonial bird. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 97(26), 14825–14830.
43.
BussD. M. (1987). Selection, evocation, and manipulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(6), 1214.
44.
BussD. M. (2008). Human nature and individual differences: Evolution of human personality. In JohnO. P., RobinsR. W., & PervinL. A. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (3rd ed.). (pp. 29–60). New York: Guilford.
45.
BussD. M., & HawleyP. H. (Eds.) (2011). The evolution of personality and individual differences. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
46.
CainN.M., PincusA.L., & AnsellE.B. (2008). Narcissism at the crossroads: Phenotypic description of pathological narcissism across clinical theory, social/personality psychology, and psychiatric diagnosis. Clinical Psychology Review, 28, 638–656.
47.
CalkinsM.W. (1906). A reconciliation between structural and functional psychology. Psychological Review, 13, 61–81.
48.
CampbellD.T. (1960). Blind variation and selective retention in creative thought as in other knowledge processes. Psychological Review, 67, 380–400.
49.
CandlandD. K. (2013). Introduction to the special issue. Review of General Psychology, 17(2), 123. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032834
50.
CantorN., & LangstonC. (1989). “Ups and downs” of life tasks in a life transition. In PervinL. A. (Ed.), Goal concepts in personality and social psychology (pp. 127–168). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
51.
CantorN., and KihlstromJ. F. (1987). Personality and social intelligence. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
52.
CapraraG. V. (1986). Indicators of aggression: The dissipation–rumination scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 7, 763–769.
53.
CarereC., & MaestripieriD. (Eds.) (2013). Animal personalities: Behavior, physiology, and evolution. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
54.
CarverC. S., & ScheierM. E. (1981). Attention and self–regulation: A control theory approach to human behavior. NewYork, NY:Springer.
55.
CarverC. S., ScheierM. F., 1990. Origins and functions of positive and negative affect: A control–process view. Psychological Review97(1), 19–35.
56.
CaspiA., & RobertsB.W. (2001). Personality development across the life span: The argument for change and continuity. Psychological Inquiry, 12, 49–66.
57.
CaspiA., HoutsR. M., BelskyD. W., HarringtonH., HoganS., RamrakhaS., . . . MoffittT.E. (2016). Childhood forecasting of a small segment of the population with large economic burden. Nature Human Behaviour, 1, 0005. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562–016–0005
58.
CaspiA., RobertsB. W. & ShinerR. L. (2005). Personality development: Stability and change. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 453–484.
59.
CattellR. B. (1943). The description of personality: Basic traits resolved into clusters. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 38, 476–506.
CervoneD. (1991). The two disciplines of personality psychology. Psychological Science, 6, 371–377.
62.
CervoneD. (1997). Social–cognitive mechanisms and personality coherence: Self–knowledge, situational beliefs, and cross–situational coherence in perceived self–efficacy. Psychological Science, 8, 43–50.
63.
CervoneD. (1999). Bottom–up explanation in personality psychology: The case of cross–situational coherence. In CervoneD. & ShodaY. (Eds.), The coherence of personality: Social–cognitive bases of personality consistency, variability, and organization (pp. 303–341). New York: Guilford Press.
64.
CervoneD. (2004). The architecture of personality. Psychological Review, 111, 183–204.
65.
CervoneD. (2005). Personality architecture: Within–person structures and processes. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 423–452.
66.
CervoneD. (2008). Explanatory models of personality: Social–cognitive theories and the knowledge–and–appraisal model of personality architecture. In BoyleG., MatthewsG., & SaklofskeD. (Eds.), Handbook of personality and testing (pp. 80–100). London: Sage Publications.
67.
CervoneD. & LittleB. R. (2017). Personality architecture and dynamics: The new agenda, and what's new about it. Personality and Individual Differences.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.07.001
68.
CervoneD., & QuirinM. (2017). Personality and its coherence: Insights from social–cognitive and personality systems interaction theory. In BaumannN., KazénM., QuirinM. R., & KooleS. L. (Eds.). Why people do the things they do: Building on Julius Kuhl's contribution to the psychology of motivation and volition (pp. 217–236). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
69.
CervoneD., CaldwellT. L., FioriM., OromH., ShadelW. G., KasselJ., & ArtisticoD. (2008). What underlies appraisals?: Experimentally testing a knowledge–and–appraisal model of personality architecture among smokers contemplating high–risk situations. Journal of Personality, 76, 929–967.
70.
CervoneD., JiwaniN., & WoodR. W. (1991). Goal setting and the differential influence of self–regulatory processes on complex decision–making performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 257–266.
71.
CervoneD., ShadelW. G., & JenciusS. (2001). Social–cognitive theory of personality assessment. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 33–51.
ClarkD. A., DurbinC. E., HicksB. M., IaconoW. G., & McGueM. (2017). Personality in the age of industry: Structure, heritability, and correlates of personality in middle childhood from the perspective of parents, teachers, and children. Journal Research in Personality, 67, 132–143.
74.
ClarkL. A. (2005). Temperament as a unifying basis for personality and psychopathology. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 114, 505–521.
75.
ClarkL. A. (2007). Assessment and diagnosis of personality disorder: Perennial issues and an emerging reconceptualization. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 227–257.
76.
ClarkinJ. F., & HuprichS. K. (2011). Do DSM–5 personality disorder proposals meet criteria for clinical utility?Journal of Personality Disorders, 25, 192–205.
77.
CondonD. M. (2016). The SAPA Personality Inventory: An empirically–derived, hierarchically–organized self– report personality assessment model. Unsubmitted manuscript.
CorrP. J., FajkowskaM., EysenckM. W., & WytykowskaA. (2015). Introduction: Personality and control. In CorrP. J., FajkowskaM., EysenckM. W., & WytykowskaA. (Eds.), Personality and control (pp. 1–11). Clinton Corners, NY: Eliot Werner.
80.
CosmidesL. & ToobyJ. (2013). Evolutionary psychology: New perspectives on cognition and motivation. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 201–229.
81.
CostaP. T., McCraeR. R. (2006). Age changes in personality and their origins: Comment on Roberts, Walton and Viechtbauer (2006). Psychological Bulletin132 (1), 26–28.
82.
CostaP. T., McCraeR. R. (1998). Six approaches to the explication of facet–level traits: Examples from conscientiousness. European Journal of Personality12 (2), 117–134.
83.
CostantiniG., EpskampS., BorsboomD., PeruginiM., MõttusR., WaldorpL. J., & CramerA. O. J. (2015a). State of the art personality research: A tutorial on network analysis of personality data in R. Journal of Research in Personality, 54, 13–29.
84.
CostantiniG., RichetinJ., BorsboomD., FriedE. I., RhemtullaM., & PeruginiM. (2015b). Development of indirect measures of conscientiousness: Combining a facets approach and network analysis. European Journal of Personality, 29, 548–567.
85.
CourvoisierD. S., NussbeckF. W., EidM., GeiserC., & ColeD. A. (2008). Analyzing the convergent and discriminant validity of states and traits: Development and applications of multimethod latent state–trait models. Psychological Assessment, 20, 270–280. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012812
86.
CraikK.H. (1986). Personality research methods: An historical perspective. Journal of Personality, 54, 18–51.
87.
CramerA. O. J., van der SluisS., NoordhofA., WichersM., GeschwindN., AggenS. H., ... BorsboomD. (2012). Dimensions of normal personality as networks in search of equilibrium: You can't like parties if you don't like people. European Journal of Personality, 26, 414–431.
88.
CramerA. O. J., WaldorpL. J., van der MaasH. L. J., & BorsboomD. (2010). Comorbidity: A network perspective. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33, 137–193.
89.
CramerA. O., SluisS., NoordhofA., WichersM., GeschwindN., AggenS. H., ... & BorsboomD. (2012). Dimensions of normal personality as networks in search of equilibrium: You can't like parties if you don't like people. European Journal of Personality, 26(4), 414–431.
90.
CregoC., & WidigerT. A. (2015). Psychopathy and the DSM. Journal of Personality, 83, 665–677.
91.
CronbachL. J., & MeehlP. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281.
92.
CronbachL.J. (1957). Two disciplines of scientific psychology. American Psychologist, 12, 671–684.
93.
CronbachL.J. (1975). Beyond the two disciplines of scientific psychology. American Psychologist, 30, 116–127.
94.
DavydenkoM. & ZelenskiJ. M., GonzalezA., & WhelanD. (2017). Does extraverted behavior evoke positive responses from new interaction partners? Manuscript under review.
95.
DawoodS., & PincusA. L. (2016). Multisurface interpersonal assessment in a cognitive–behavioral therapy context. Journal of Personality Assessment, 98(5), 449–460. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2016.1159215
96.
De RuiterN.M.P., van GeertP.L.C., KunnenS. (2017). Explaining the “how” of self–esteem development: The self–organizing self–esteem model. Review of General Psychology, 21(1), 49–68. https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000099
97.
Del GiudiceM. (2009). Sex, attachment, and the development of reproductive strategies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32, 1–21.
98.
Del GiudiceM. (2014a). Middle childhood: An evolutionary–developmental synthesis. Child Development Perspectives, 8, 193–200.
99.
Del GiudiceM. (2014b). Early stress and human behavioral development: Emerging evolutionary perspectives. Journal of Developmental Origins of Health and Disease, 5, 270–280.
100.
Del GiudiceM. (in press). The evolutionary context of personality development. In McAdamsD. P., ShinerR. L., & TackettJ. L. (Eds.), Handbook of personality development. New York: Guilford.
101.
DenissenJ. J., & PenkeL. (2008). Motivational individual reaction norms underlying the Five–Factor model of personality: First steps towards a theory–based conceptual framework. Journal of Research in Personality, 42(5), 1285–1302.
102.
DeYoungC. G. (2006). Higher–order factors of the Big Five in a multi–informant sample. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(6), 1138–1151. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022–3514.91.6.1138
DeYoungC. G. (2017). In defense of (some) trait theories: Commentary on Hogan and Foster (2016). International Journal of Personality Psychology, 3, 13–16.
105.
DeYoungC. G., HirshJ. B., ShaneM. S., PapademetrisX., RajeevanN., & GrayJ. R. (2010). Testing predictions from personality neuroscience: Brain structure and the Big Five. Psychological Science, 21, 820–828.
106.
Di BlasL., GrassiM., CarnaghiA., FerranteD., & CalarcoD. (2017). Within–person and between–people variability in personality dynamics: Knowledge structures, self–efficacy, pleasure appraisals, and the Big Five. Journal of Research in Personality, 70, 84–92.
DiriwächterR. & ValsinerJ. (2008, Eds.). Striving for the whole: Creating theoretical syntheses. Somerset, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
110.
DobzhanskyT. (1955). Evolution, genetics, and man. New York: Wiley.
111.
DodgeK. A. (1980). Social cognition and children's aggressive behavior. Child Development, 51, 162–170.
112.
DormanC., & GriffinM. A. (2015). Optimal time lags in panel studies. Psychological Methods, 20, 487–505. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000041
113.
DuckworthA. L., GendlerT. S., & GrossJ. J. (2016). Situational strategies for self–control. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11, 35–55.
114.
DumontF. (2010). A history of personality psychology: Theory, science, and research from Hellenism to the twenty–first century. New York: Cambridge University Press.
115.
DurbinC. E., HicksB. M. (2014). Personality and psychopathology: A stagnant field in need of development. European Journal of Personality28, 362–386. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1962
116.
DurrantR., & EllisB. J. (2003). Evolutionary psychology. In GallagherM., & NelsonR. J. (Eds.), Comprehensive handbook of psychology, Vol. 3 (pp. 1–33). New York, NY: Wiley.
117.
DweckC. S., & LeggettE. L. (1988). A social–cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95, 256–273.
118.
EatonN. R. (2015). Latent variable and network models of comorbidity: Toward an empirically derived nosology. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 50(6), 845–849.
119.
EavesL. J., LastK., MartinN. G., & JinksJ. L. (1977). A progressive approach to non–additivity and genotype–environmental covariance in the analysis of human differences. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 30(1), 1–42.
120.
EliaszA. (1981). Temperament a system regulacji stymulacji [temperament and system of regulation of stimulation]. Warsaw: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.
121.
EpskampS., WaldorpL. J., MõttusR., & BorsboomD. (2016). Discovering psychological dynamics: The Gaussian graphical model in cross–sectional and time–series data. ArXiv,1609.04156.
122.
EpsteinS. (1983). A research paradigm for the study of personality and emotions. In PageM. M. (Ed.), Personality: Current theory and research: 1982 Nebraska symposium on motivation (pp. 91–154). Lincoln: University of Nebraska.
123.
EysenckH. J. (1957). Drugs and personality. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 103(430), 119–131.
124.
EysenckH. J. (1970). The structure of human personality (3rd ed.). London: Methuen.
125.
FahrenbergJ. (1996). Ambulatory assessment: Issues and perspectives. In FahrenbergJ. & MyrtekM. (Eds.), Ambulatory assessment: Computer–assisted psychological and psychophysiological methods in monitoring and field studies (pp. 3–20). Seattle, WA: Hogrefe & Huber.
126.
FahrenbergJ. (2001). Origins and developments of ambulatory monitoring and assessment. In FahrenbergJ. & MyrtekM. (Eds.). Progress in ambulatory assessment (pp. 587–614). Seattle, WA: Hogrefe & Huber.
127.
FajkowskaM. (2013). Personality coherence and incoherence: A perspective on anxiety and depression. Clinton Corners, NY: Eliot Werner Publications.
128.
FajkowskaM. (2015). The complex–system approach to personality: Main theoretical assumptions. Journal of Research in Personality, 56, 15–32.
129.
FajkowskaM. & DeYoungC. G. (2015b) (Eds.), Journal of Research in Personality. Special Issue on Integrative Theories of Personality, 56. USA: Elsevier.
130.
FajkowskaM., & DeYoungC. G. (2015a). Introduction to the special issue on integrative theories of personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 56, 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2015.04.001
131.
FeyerabendP. (2010). Against method, fourth edition. New York, NY: Verso Books.
132.
FioriM. (2009). A new look at emotional intelligence: A dual–process framework. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13, 21–44
133.
FisherA.J., MegdaliaJ.D., JeronimusB.F. (submitted). Nonergodicity is a threat to human subjects research.
134.
FleesonW. (2001). Towards a structure– and process–integrated view of personality: Traits as density distributions of states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 1011–1027.
135.
FleesonW. (2012). Perspectives on the person: Rapid growth and opportunities for integration. In DeauxK. & SnyderM. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of personality and social psychology (pp. 33–63). New York: Oxford University Press.
FleesonW., & LawM. K. (2015). Trait enactments as density distributions: The role of actors, situations, and observers in explaining stability and variability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109, 1090–1104.
138.
FleesonW., MalanosA. B., & AchilleN. M. (2002). An intraindividual process approach to the relationship between extraversion and positive affect: Is acting extraverted as “good” as being extraverted?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1409–1422.
139.
FonagyP., & LuytenP. (2012). Psychodynamic models of personality disorders. In WidigerT. A. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of personality disorders (pp. 345–371). NY: Oxford University Press.
140.
ForbesM. K., KotovR., RuggeroC. J., WatsonD., ZimmermanM., & KruegerR. F. (in press). Delineating the joint hierarchical structure of clinical and personality disorders in an outpatient psychiatric sample. Comprehensive Psychiatry.
141.
ForbesM., WrightA., MarkonK., & KruegerR. (in press). Evidence that psychopathology symptom networks have limited replicability. Journal of Abnormal Psychology. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000276
142.
FordD. H., & LernerR. M. (1992). Developmental systems theory: An integrative approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
143.
FrankenhuisW. E., & FraleyR. C. (in press). What do evolutionary models teach us about sensitive periods in psychological development?European Psychologist. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016–9040/a000265
144.
FrankenhuisW. E., PanchanathanK., & NettleD. (2016). Cognition in harsh and unpredictable environments. Current Opinion in Psychology, 7, 76–80.
145.
FriedE. I., van BorkuloC. D., CramerA. O. J., BoschlooL., SchoeversR. A., & BorsboomD. (2017). Mental disorders as networks of problems: A review of recent insights. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatry Epidemiology, 52, 1–10.
146.
FunderD.C. (2001). Personality. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 187–221.
147.
GabbardG. O. (2005). Psychodynamic approaches to personality disorders. Focus, 3, 363–367.
148.
GaltonF. (1884) Measurement of character. Fortnightly Review36: 179–185.
149.
GaltonF., 1863. Meteorographica, methods of mapping the weather. Macmillan.
GeukesK., NestlerS., HuttemanR., KüfnerA. C. P., & BackM. D. (2017). Trait personality and state variability: Predicting individual differences in within– and cross–context fluctuations in affect, self–evaluations, and behavior in everyday life. Journal of Research in Personality.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2016.06.003
152.
GeukesK., van ZalkM. H. W., & BackM. D. (2017). Analyzing processes in personality development. In SpechtJ. (Ed.). Personality development across the lifespan (pp. 455–472). San Diego: Elsevier.
153.
GeukesK., van ZalkM., & BackM. D. (in press). Understanding personality development: An integrative state process model. International Journal of Behavioral Development. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025416677847.
154.
GoldbergL. R. (2006). Doing it all bass–ackwards: The development of hierarchical factor structures from the top down. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 347–358.
155.
GoldbergL. R., 1992. The development of markers for the big–five factor structure. Psychological Assessment4 (1), 26–42.
156.
GollwitzerP. M. (1990). Action phases and mind–sets. In HigginsE. T. & SorrentinoR. M. (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior (Vol. 2, pp. 53–92). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
157.
GottesmanI.I. (1963). Genetic aspects of intelligent behavior. In EllisN.R. (Ed.), Handbook of mental deficiency: Psychological theory and research (pp. 253–296). New York: McGraw–Hill.
158.
GrayJ. A. (1981). A critique of Eysenck's theory of personality. In EysenckH. J. (Ed.), A model for personality (pp. 246–276). New York, NY: Springer–Verlag.
159.
GrayJ. A., McNaughtonN. (2000). The neuropsychology of anxiety: An enquiry into the functions of the septo–hippocampal system. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
160.
GreveW. (2005). Maintaining personality: The active and adaptive self as core of individuality and personhood. In GreveW., RothermundK., & WenturaD. (Eds.), The adaptive self. Personal continuity and intentional self–development (pp. 49–70). Cambridge, MA: Hogrefe & Huber.
161.
GriffithJ. W., ZinbargR. E., CraskeM. G., MinekaS., RoseR. D., WatersA. M., & SuttonJ. M. (2010). Neuroticism as a common dimension in the internalizing disorders. Psychological Medicine, 40, 1125–1136.
162.
GrossJ. J., & ThompsonR. A. (2007). Emotion regulation: Conceptual foundations. In GrossJ. J. (Ed.), Handbook of emotion regulation (pp. 3–24). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
163.
GundersonJ. G. (2010). Commentary on “personality traits and the classification of mental disorders: Toward a more complete integration in DSM–5 and an empirical model of psychopathology.”Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 1, 119–122.
164.
GundersonJ. G. (2013). Seeking clarity for future revisions of the personality disorders in DSM–5. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 4, 368–378.
165.
GurvenM., von RuedenC., MassenkoffM., & KaplanH. (2013). How universal is the Big Five? Testing the five–factor model of personality variation among forager–farmers in the Bolivian Andes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 354–370.
166.
HaaseC., HeckhausenJ., & WroschC. (2013). Developmental regulation across the life span: Toward a new synthesis. Developmental Psychology, 49, 964–972.
167.
HagemeyerB., SchönbrodtF. D., NeyerF. J., NeberichW., & AsendorpfJ. B. (2015). When “together” means “too close”: Agency motives and relationship functioning in co–resident and living–apart–together couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109, 813–835. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000031
168.
HallC. S., & LindzeyG. (1957). Theories of personality. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
169.
HamakerE. L., NesselroadeJ. R., & MolenaarP. C. (2007). The integrated trait–state model. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 295–315.
170.
HamakerE.L., WichersM. (2017). No time like the present: Discovering the hidden dynamics in intensive longitudinal data. Current Directions in Psychological Science26, 10–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721416666518
171.
HammenC., MarksT., deMayoR., & MayolA. (1985). Self–schemas and risks for depression: A prospective study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 1147–1159.
172.
HammersleyM. (2013). The myth of research–based policy and practice. London: Sage
173.
HampsonS. E. (2012). Personality processes: Mechanisms by which personality traits “get outside the skin”. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 315–339.
174.
HanscombeK. B., HaworthC. M. A., DavisO. S. P., JaffeeS. R., & PlominR. (2010). The nature (and nurture) of children's perceptions of family chaos. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(5), 549–553.
175.
HareR. D. (1993). Without conscience. The disturbing world of the psychopaths among us. NY: Pocket Books.
176.
HaydenE. P., KleinD. N., DoughertyL. R., OlinoT. M., LaptookR. S., DysonM. W., et al. (2010). The dopamine D2 receptor gene and depressive and anxious symptoms in childhood: Associations and evidence for gene–environment correlation and gene–environment interaction. Psychiatric Genetics, 20(6), 304–310.
177.
HayesA. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. New York: The Guilford Press.
178.
HayesK. K. (1962). Genes, drives, and intellect. Psychological Reports, 10(2), 299–342.
179.
HeathA. C. & MartinN. G. (1990), Psychoticism as a dimension of personality: A multivariate genetic test of Eysenck and Eysenck's psychoticism construct. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 111–121.
180.
HeckhausenH. (1991). Motivation and action. New York, NY: Springer–Verlag.
HeppJ., LaneS. P., CarpenterR. W., NiedtfeldI., BrownW. C., & TrullT. J. (2017). Interpersonal problems and negative affect in borderline personality and depressive disorders in daily life. Clinical Psychological Science, 5(3), 470–484.
183.
HookerK. (2002). New directions for research in personality and aging: A comprehensive model for linking levels, structures, and processes. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 318–334.
184.
HookerK., & McAdamsD. P. (2003). Personality reconsidered: A new agenda for aging research. Journals of Gerontology: Series B. Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 58, P296–P304.
185.
HopwoodC. J. (2011). Personality traits in the DSM–5. Journal of Personality Assessment, 93, 398–405.
186.
HopwoodC. J., WrightA. G. C., AnsellE. B., & PincusA. L. (2013). The interpersonal core of personality pathology. Journal of Personality Disorders, 27(3), 270–295.
187.
HoqueF., & BaerD (2014). Everything connects. New York: McGraw–Hill.
188.
HorowitzL. M., WilsonK. R., TuranB., ZolotsevP., ConstantinoM. J., & HendersonL. (2006). How interpersonal motives clarify the meaning of interpersonal behavior: A revised circumplex model. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(1), 67–86. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr1001_4
189.
HudsonN. W., LucasR. E., & DonnellanM. B. (2017). Day–to–day affect is surprisingly stable: A 2–year longitudinal study of well–being. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(1), 45–54.
190.
HughesS., De HouwerJ., & PeruginiM. (2016). The functional–cognitive framework for psychological research: Controversies and resolutions. International Journal of Psychology, 51(1), 4–14.
191.
HuesmannL. R., & GuerraN. G. (1997). Children's normative beliefs about aggression and aggressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 408–419.
192.
IckesW., SnyderM., and GarciaS. (1997). Personality influences on the choice of situations. In HoganR. and JohnsonJ. A. (eds.), Handbook of personality psychology (pp. 165–195). San Diego, CA: Academic Press, Inc.
193.
InselT. R., & CuthbertB. N. (2009). Endophenotypes: Bridging genomic complexity and disorder heterogeneity. Biological Psychiatry, 66(11), 988–989.
194.
InselT., CuthbertB., GarveyM., HeinssenR., PineD. S., QuinnK., SanislowC., & WangP. (2010). Research domain criteria (RDoC): Toward a new classification framework for research on mental disorders. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 167(7), 748–751.
195.
JaenikeJ. & HoltR. D. (1991). Genetic variation for habitat preference: Evidence and explanations. The American Naturalist, 137, S67–S90.
196.
JaffeeS. R. & PriceT. S. (2012). The implications of genotype–environment correlation for establishing causal processes in psychopathology. Developmental Psychopatholology, 24(4), 1253–1264.
JeronimusB. F., KotovR., RieseH., & OrmelJ. (2016). Neuroticism's prospective association with mental disorders halves after adjustment for baseline symptoms and psychiatric history, but the adjusted association hardly decays with time: A meta–analysis on 59 longitudinal/prospective studies with 443,313 participants. Psychological Medicine, 46, 2883–2906. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291716001653
199.
JeronimusB. F., RieseH., SandermanR., & OrmelJ. (2014). Mutual reinforcement between neuroticism and life stressors: A five–wave, sixteen–year study to test reciprocal causation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107(4), 751. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037009
200.
JeronimusB.F., van der KriekeL., BlaauwF.J., EmerenciaA.C., SlaetsJ., de JongeP. (submitted). Differences in subjective well–being across the lifespan and the role of personality and capabilities: In search of wisdom among the elderly.
201.
JohnO. P., NaumannL. P., & SotoC. J. (2008). Paradigm shift to the integrative Big Five trait taxonomy. In : JohnOliver P., RobinsRichard W., PervinLawrence A. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp.114–158). New York: Guilford.
202.
JohnsonW. (2010). Extending and testing tom Bouchard's experience producing drive theory. Personality and Individual Differences, 49(4), 296–301.
203.
JohnsonW., BouchardT. J., 2005. The structure of human intelligence: It is verbal, perceptual, and image rotation (vpr), not fluid and crystallized. Intelligence33 (4), 393–416.
204.
JohnsonW., HicksB. M., McGueM., & IaconoW. G. (2007). Most of the girls are alright, but some aren't: Personality trajectory groups from ages 14 to 24 and some associations with outcomes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 266–284. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022–3514.93.2.266
205.
JustC. (2011). A review of literature on the general factor of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 765–771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.01.008
206.
KachinK. E., NewmanM. G., & PincusA. L. (2001). An interpersonal problem approach to the division of social phobia subtypes. Behavior Therapy, 32(3), 479–501. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0005–7894(01)80032–0
207.
KandlerC., ZimmermannJ., & McAdamsD. P. (2014). Core and surface characteristics for the description and theory of personality differences and development. European Journal of Personality, 28, 231–243. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1952
208.
KurzbanR., & AktipisC. A. (2007). Modularity and the social mind: Are psychologists too self–ish?Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11(2), 131–149.
209.
KellyG. A. (1955). The psychology of personal constructs. New York: Norton.
210.
KendlerK. S., ZacharP., CraverC. (2011). What kinds of things are psychiatric disorders?Pschological Medicine, 41, 1143–1150. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291710001844
211.
KenrickD. T., GriskeviciusV., NeubergS. L., & SchallerM. (2010). Renovating the pyramid of needs: Contemporary extensions built upon ancient foundations. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 292–314.
212.
KernbergO. F. (1993). Severe personality disorders. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
213.
KimH., & EatonN. R. (2015). The hierarchical structure of common mental disorders: Connecting multiple levels of analysis, bifactor models, and predictive validity. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 124(4), 1064–1078.
214.
KimH., & EatonN. R. (in press). A hierarchical integration of person–centered comorbidity models: Structure, stability, and transition over time. Clinical Psychological Science.
215.
KoobG. F., & Le MoalM. (1997). Drug abuse: Hedonic homeostatic dysregulation. Science, 278(5335), 52–58.
216.
KoolhaasJ.M., de BoerS.F., CoppensC.M., & BuwaldaB. (2010). Neuroendocrinology of coping styles: Towards understanding the biology of individual variation. Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology, 31, 307–321.
217.
KotovR., KruegerR.F., WatsonD., AchenbachT.M., … WrightA.G.C., ZimmermanM. (2017). The hierarchical taxonomy of psychopathology (HiTOP): A dimensional alternative to traditional nosologies. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, Vol 126(4), 454–477. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000258
218.
KozakM. J., & CuthbertB. N. (2016). The NIMH research domain criteria initiative: Background, issues, and pragmatics. Psychophysiology, 53(3), 286–297. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.12518.
219.
KruegerR. F., & TackettJ. L. (Eds.) (2006). Personality and psychopathology: Building bridges. New York: The Guilford Press.
220.
KruegerR. F., DerringerJ., MarkonK. E., WatsonD., & SkodolA. E. (2012). Initial construction of a maladaptive personality trait model and inventory for DSM–5. Psychological Medicine, 42(9), 1879–1890.
221.
KubiakT., & StoneA. A. (2012). Ambulatory monitoring of biobehavioral processes in health and disease. Psychosomatic Medicine, 74, 325–326.
222.
LaheyB. B. (2009). Public health significance of neuroticism. American Psychologist, 64, 241–256.
223.
LapsleyD. K., & HillP. L. (2009). The development of the moral personality. In NarvaezD. & LapsleyD. (Eds.), Personality, identity, and character: Explorations in moral psychology (pp.185–213). New York: Cambridge University Press.
224.
LarsonR., & CsikszentmihalyiM. (1983). The experience sampling method. In ReisH. T. (Ed.), New directions for methodology of social and behavioral sciences (vol. 15, pp. 41–56). San Francisco: Jossey–Bass.
225.
LaskowskiK. L. & BellA. M. (2014). Strong personalities, not social niches, drive individual differences in social behaviours in sticklebacks. Animal Behaviour, 90, 287–295.
LawsonC., MacLeodC., & HammondG. (2002). Interpretation revealed in the blink of an eye: Depressive bias in the resolution of ambiguity. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 111(2), 321.
228.
LeaA. J., BlumsteinD. T., WeyT. W., & MartinJ. G. A. (2010). Heritable victimization and the benefits of agonistic relationships. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107(50), 21587–21592.
229.
LeckeltM., KüfnerA. C. P., NestlerS., & BackM. D. (2015). Behavioral processes underlying the decline of narcissists’ popularity over time. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109, 856–871.
230.
LewinK. (1943). Defining the ‘field at a given time’. Psychological Review, 50(3), 292.
231.
LilienfeldS. O., WattsA. L., SmithS., BergJ. M., & LatzmanR. D. (2015). Psychopathy deconstructed and reconstructed: Identifying and assembling the personality building blocks of Cleckley's chimera. Journal of Personality, 83, 593–610.
232.
LittleB. R. (1972). Psychological man as scientist, humanist and specialist. Journal of Experimental Research in Personality, 6, 95–118.
233.
LittleB. R. (1983). Personal projects: A rationale and method for investigation. Environment and Behavior, 15(3), 273–309. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916583153002.
234.
LittleB. R. (1987). Personality and the environment. In StokolsD. & AltmanI. (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology (pp. 205–244). New York: Wiley.
235.
LittleB. R. (1989). Personal projects analysis: Trivial pursuits, magnificent obsessions, and the search for coherence. In BussD. & CantorN. (Eds.), Personality psychology: Recent trends and emerging directions (pp. 15–31). New York: Springer–Verlag.
236.
LittleB. R. (1999). Personality and motivation: Personal action and the conative evolution. In PervinL. A. & JohnO. P. (Eds.), Handbook of personality theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 501–524). New York: Guilford.
237.
LittleB. R. (2005). Personality science and personal projects: Six impossible things before breakfast. Journal of Research in Personality, 39(1), 4–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2004.09.003.
238.
LittleB. R. (2006). Personality science and self–regulation: Personal projects as integrative units. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 55, 419–427
239.
LittleB. R. (2007). Prompt and circumstance: The generative contexts of personal projects analysis. In LittleB. R., Salmela–AroK., & PhillipsS. D. (Eds.), Personal project pursuit: Goals, action, and human flourishing (pp. 3–49). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
240.
LittleB. R. (2008). Personal projects and free traits: Personality and motivation reconsidered. Social and Personality Compass, 2(3), 1235–1254. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751–9004.2008.00106.x.
241.
LittleB. R. (2014a). Me, myself and us: The science of personality and the art of well– being. New York: PublicAffairs Books.
242.
LittleB. R. (2015). The integrative challenge in personality science: Personal projects as units of analysisJournal of Research in Personality, 56, 93–101.
243.
LittleB. R. (2016). Well–doing: Personal projects and the social ecology of flourishing. In VittersøJ. (Ed), Handbook of Eudaimonic well–being (pp. 297–305). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
244.
LittleB. R., & CoulombeS. (2014). Personal projects analysis. In International encyclopedia of social and behavioral sciences. Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
245.
LittleB. R., & GeeT. L. (2007). The methodology of personal projects analysis: Four modules and a funnel. In LittleB. R., Salmela–AroK., & PhillipsS. D. (Eds.), Personal project pursuit: Goals, action, and human flourishing (pp. 51–94). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
246.
LittleB. R., & JosephM. F. (2007). Personal projects and free traits: Mutable selves and well beings. In LittleB. R., Salmela–AroK., & PhillipsS. D. (Eds.), Personal project pursuit: Goals, action, and human flourishing (pp. 375–400). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
247.
LittleB. R., LecciL., & WatkinsonB. (1992). Personality and personal projects: Linking Big Five and PAC units of analysis. Journal of Personality, 60(2), 501–525. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467–6494.1992.tb00982.x.
248.
LittleB. R., LimaM. P., & WhelanD. C. (2006). Positive and negative affect in personal projects: Exploring hot pursuits in Portugal and Canada. Palm Springs, CA: Presented at Association for Research in Personality Conference, Palm Springs, CA.
249.
LittleB.R. (2000). Persons, contexts, and personal projects: Assumptive themes of a methodological transactionalism, in: WapnerS., DemickJ., YamamotoT., & MinamiH. (Eds.), Theoretical perspectives in environment–behavior research: Underlying assumptions, research problems, and methodologies (pp. 79–88). Dordrecht, Netherlands Kluwer.
250.
LittleB.R. (2010) Opening space for project pursuit: Affordance, restoration and chills. In Ward ThompsonC., AspinallP. A., & BellS. (Eds), Innovative approaches to researching landscape and health: Open Space: People Space 2 (pp. 163–178). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
251.
LobbestaelJ., & ArntzP. (2012), Cognitive contributions to personality disorder. In WidigerT. A. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of personality disorders (pp. 325–344). NY: Oxford University Press.
252.
LoevingerJ. (1987). Paradigms of personality psychology. New York, NY: Freeman.
253.
LucasR. E., & DienerE. (2001). Understanding extraverts’ enjoyment of social situations: The importance of pleasantness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 343–356.
254.
LuhmannM., OrthU., SpechtJ., KandlerC., & LucasR. E. (2014). Studying changes in life circumstances and personality: It's About time. European Journal of Personality, 28(3), 256–266. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1951
255.
LukaszewskiA. W., GurvenM., von RuedenC. R., & SchmittD. P. (2017). What explains personality covariation? A test of the socioecological complexity hypothesis. Social Psychological and Personality Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617697175
256.
LuttbegB., & SihA., (2010). Risk, resources and state–dependent adaptive behavioral syndromes. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 365, 3977–3990.
257.
LykkenD. T. (1995). The antisocial personalities. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
258.
LynamD.R., & WidigerT.A. (2007). Using a general model of personality to identify the basic elements of psychopathy. Journal of Personality Disorders, 21, 160–178.
259.
MarkonK. E. (2013). Epistemological pluralism and scientific development: An argument against authoritative nosologies. Journal of Personality Disorders, 27,554–79.
260.
MarkonK. E., & JonasK. G. (2016). Structure as cause and representation: Implications of descriptivist inference for structural modeling across multiple levels of analysis. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 125(8), 1146–1157. https://doi.org/https://doi.org.proxy.lib.uiowa.edu/10.1037/abn0000206
261.
MarkonK. E., KruegerR. F., & WatsonD. (2005). Delineating the structure of normal and abnormal personality: An integrative hierarchical approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(1), 139–157.
262.
MarkusH. (1977). Self–schemata and processing information about the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 63–78.
263.
MaruszewskiT., FajkowskaM., & EysenckM.W. (Eds.). (2010). Personality from biological, cognitive and social perspective. Clinton Corners, NY: Eliot Werner Publications.
264.
MayerJ. D. (2003). Structural divisions of personality and the classification of traits. Review of General Psychology, 7(4), 381–401. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089–2680.7.4.381
265.
MayerJ. D. (2005). A tale of two visions: Can a new view of personality help integrate psychology?American Psychologist, 60(4), 294–307. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003–066X.60.4.294
266.
MayerJ. D. (2015). The personality systems framework: Current theory and development. Journal of Research in Personality, 56, 4–14.
267.
MayerJ. D., & SkimmyhornW. (2017). Personality attributes that predict performance of cadets at west point. Journal of Research in Personality, 66, 14–16.
268.
MayerJ. D. (2018). Personality: A systems approach (2nd ed.). New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
269.
MayerJ. D., & AllenJ. L. (2013). A personality framework for the unification of psychology. Review of General Psychology, 17(2), 196–202. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032934
270.
Maynard SmithJ. (1993). The theory of evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
271.
McAdamsD. P. (2006). The person: A new introduction to personality psychology (4th ed.). New York: Wiley.
272.
McAdamsD. P., & PalsJ. L. (2006). A new Big Five: Fundamental principles for an integrative science of personality. American Psychologist, 61, 204–217.
273.
McCabeK. O., & FleesonW. (2016). Are traits useful? Explaining trait manifestations as tools in the pursuit of goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110, 287–301.
274.
McClellandG. H., & JuddC. M. (1993). Statistical difficulties of detecting interactions and moderator effects. Psychological Bulletin, 114(2), 376–390. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033–2909.114.2.376
275.
McCraeR. R., & CostaP. T. (1996). Toward a new generation of personality theories: Theoretical contexts for the five–factor model. In WigginsJ.S. (Ed.), The five–factor model of personality. Theoretical perspectives (pp. 51–87). New York: Guilford.
276.
McCraeR. R., & CostaP. T. (2008). The Five–Factor Theory of personality. In JohnO. P., RobinsR. W., & PervinL. A. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 159–181). New York: Guilford Press.
277.
McCraeR. R., CostaP. T., & BuschC.M. (1986). Evaluating comprehensiveness in personality systems: The California Q–Set and the five–factor model. Journal of Personality, 54, 430–446.
278.
McDougallW. (1929). The chemical theory of temperament applied to introversion and extroversion. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 24(3), 293–309.
279.
McGrewK. (2009). CHC theory and the human cognitive abilities project: Standing on the shoulders of the giants of psychometric intelligence research. Intelligence37(1), 1–10.
280.
McPhersonM., Smith–LovinL., & CookJ. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415–444.
281.
MehlM. R., PennebakerJ. W., CrowD. M., DabbsJ., & PriceJ. H. (2001). The electronically activated recorder (EAR): A device for sampling naturalistic daily activities and conversations. Behavior Research Methods: Instruments and Computers, 33, 517–523.
282.
MehlM. R., VazireS., Ramírez–EsparzaN., SlatcherR. B., & PennebakerJ. W. (2007). Are women really more talkative than men?Science, 317(5834), 82–82.
283.
Mendoza–DentonR., AydukO., MischelW., ShodaY., & TestaA. (2001). Person × situation interactionism in self–encoding (Iam … when …): Implications for affect regulation and social information processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(4), 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022–3514.80.4.533
284.
MillerJ. D., DirA., GentileB., WilsonL., PryorL. R., & CampbellW. K. (2010). Searching for a vulnerable dark triad: Factor 2 psychopathy, vulnerable narcissism, and borderline personality. Journal of Personality, 78, 1529–1564.
285.
MillikanR. (1993). White queen psychology and other essays for Alice. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books/ MIT Press.
286.
MischelW. (1968). Personality and assessment, New York: Wiley.
287.
MischelW., & ShodaY. (1995). A cognitive–affective system theory of personality: Reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure. Psychological Review, 102, 246–268.
288.
MischelW., & ShodaY. (1999). Integrating dispositions and processing dynamics within a unified theory of personality: The cognitive–affective personality system. In PervinL. A., & JohnO. P., (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 197–218). New York: Guilford.
289.
MiskewiczK., FleesonW., ArnoldE. M., LawM. K., MneimneM., & FurrR. M. (2015). A contingency–oriented approach to understanding borderline personality disorder: Situational triggers and symptoms. Journal of Personality Disorders, 29(4), 486–502.
290.
MolenaarP. C. (2004). A manifesto on psychology as idiographic science: Bringing the person back into scientific psychology, this time forever. Measurement, 2(4), 201–218.
291.
MolenaarP. C. (2010). Latent variable models are network models. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33, 166.
292.
MolenaarP.C. M. (2004). A manifesto on psychology as idiographic science: Bringing the person back into scientific psychology, this time forever. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2, 201–218 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1207/s15366359mea0204_1
293.
MolenaarP. C., & CampbellC. G. (2009). The new person–specific paradigm in psychology. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 112–117.
294.
MooreA., BrodieE., & WolfJ. (1997). Interacting phenotypes and the evolutionary process: I. Direct and indirect genetic effects of social interactions. Evolution, 51(5), 1352–1362. https://doi.org/10.2307/2411187
295.
MorN., & WinquistJ. (2002). Self–focused attention and negative affect: A meta–analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 638–662.
296.
MorfC. (2006). Personality reflected in a coherent idiosyncratic interplay of intra– and interpersonal self–regulatory processes. Journal of Personality, 74, 1527–1556.
297.
MõttusR. (2016). Towards more rigorous personality trait–outcome research. European Journal of Personality, 30(4), 292–303.
298.
MõttusR., & AllerhandM. (in press). Why do traits come together? The underlying trait and network approaches. In Zeigler–HillV. & ShackelfordT. K. (Eds), SAGE handbook of personality and individual differences: Volume 1. The science of personality and individual differences (pp. xx–xx). London: SAGE.
299.
MõttusR., KandlerC., BleidornW., RiemannR., & McCraeR. R. (2017). Personality traits below facets: The consensual validity, longitudinal stability, heritability, and utility of personality nuances. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112, 474–490. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000100
300.
Mullins–SweattS. N., & WidigerT. A. (2007). The Shedler–Westen assessment procedure from the perspective of general personality structure. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 116, 618–623.
301.
MundM., & NeyerF. J. (2016). Rising high or falling deep? Pathways of self–esteem in a representative German sample. European Journal of Personality, 30, 341–357. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2063
302.
MundM., FinnC., HagemeyerB., & NeyerF. J. (2016). Understanding dynamic transactions between personality traits and partner relationships. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 25, 411–416. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721416659458
303.
NesselroadeJ. R., MolenaarP. C. M., 2016. Some behavioral science measurement concerns and proposals. Multivariate Behavioral Research51(2–3), 396–412.
304.
NettleD. (2009). Personality: What makes you the way you are. Oxford University Press.
305.
NoftleE. E. (2015). Character across early emerging adulthood: Character traits, character strivings, and moral self–attributes. In MillerC. B., FurrR. M., KnobelA., & FleesonW., (Eds.), Character: New directions from philosophy, psychology, and theology (pp. 490–521). New York: Oxford University Press.
306.
NoftleE. E. & FleesonW. (2015). Intraindividual variability in adult personality development. In DiehlM., HookerK., & SliwinskiM., (Eds.), Handbook of intraindividual variability across the lifespan (pp. 176–197). New York: Routledge/Taylor & Francis.
O'ConnorB. P. (2005). A search for consensus on the dimensional structure of personality disorders. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 61(3), 323–345.
309.
Odling–SmeeF. J., LalandK. N. & FeldmanM. W. (2003). Niche construction. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
310.
OrmelJ., RieseH., & RosmalenJ. G. M. (2012). Interpreting neuroticism scores across the adult life course: Immutable or experience–dependent set points of negative affect?Clinical Psychology Review, 32(1), 71–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2011.10.004
311.
OrmelJ., VonKorffM., JeronimusB.F., RieseH. (2017). Set–point theory and personality development: Reconciliation of a paradox. SpechtN J. (Ed.). Personality development across the lifespan (pp. 117–137). San Diego: Elsevier.
312.
OyamaS. (1985). The ontogeny of information. Developmental systems and evolution. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
PincusA. L. (2010). Introduction to the special series on integrating personality, psychopathology, and psychotherapy using interpersonal assessment. Journal of Personality Assessment, 92(6), 467–470. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2010.513706
315.
PincusA. L., & WilsonK. R. (2001). Interpersonal variability in dependent personality. Journal of Personality, 69(2), 223–251. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467–6494.00143
316.
PincusA. L. & AnsellE. B. (2003). Interpersonal theory of personality. In MillonT. & LernerM.J. (Eds.), Handbook of personality (pp. 209–230). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
317.
PlominR., AsburyK., & DunnJ. (2001). Why are children in the same family so different? Nonshared environment a decade later. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 46(3), 225–233.
318.
PlominR., DeFriesJ. C., & LoehlinJ. C. (1977). Genotype–environment interaction and correlation in the analysis of human behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 309–322.
319.
PoropatA. E. & CorrP. J. (2015). Thinking bigger: The Cronbachian paradigm & personality theory integration. Journal of Research in Personality, 56, 59–69.
320.
PruittJ. N. & GoodnightC. J. (2014). Site–specific group selection drives locally adapted group compositions. Nature, 514(7522), 359–362.
321.
RauthmannJ. F. (2016). Motivational factors in the perception of psychological situation characteristics. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 10, 92–108.
RauthmannJ. F., and KolarG. P. (2012). How ‘dark’ are the dark triad traits? Examining the perceived darkness of narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Personality and Individual Differences53, 884–889.
324.
RauthmannJ. F., JonesA. B., & ShermanR. A. (2016). Directionality of person–situation transactions: Are there spillovers among and between situation experiences and personality states?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42, 893–909.
325.
RauthmannJ. F., ShermanR. A., & FunderD. C. (2015). Principles of situation research: Towards a better understanding of psychological situations. European Journal of Personality, 29(3), 363–381.
326.
RauthmannJ. F., ShermanR., FunderD. C. (Eds.), 2017. The Oxford handbook of psychological situations. Oxford.
327.
RealeD., GarantD., HumphriesM.M., BergeronP., CareauV., & MontiglioP–O. (2010). Personality and the emergence of the pace–of–life syndrome concept at the population level. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 365, 4051–4063.
328.
RealeD., ReaderS. M., SolD., McDougallP. T., & DingemanseN. J. (2007). Integrating animal temperament within ecology and evolution. Biological Reviews, 82, 291–318. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469–185X.2007.00010.x
329.
ReichertM., TörnrosT., HoellA., DornH., TostH., SalizeH.–J., Meyer–LindenbergA., ZipfA., & Ebner–PriemerU. W. (2016). Using ambulatory assessment for experience sampling and the mapping of environmental risk factors in everyday life. Die Psychiatrie, 13, 94–102.
330.
ReisH. T. (2008). Reinvigorating the concept of situation in social psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12(4), 311–329.
331.
RevelleW. & CondonD. M. (2015). A model for personality at three levels. Journal of Research in Personality, 56, 70–81.
332.
RevelleW. (1995). Personality processes. Annual Review of Psychology, 46, 295–328.
333.
RevelleW. & EllemanL. G. (2016). Factors are still fictions. European Journal of Personality, 30, 324–325.
334.
RevelleW., 2007. Experimental approaches to the study of personality. In: RobinsR., FraleyR. C., KruegerR. F. (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in personality psychology. Guilford, New York, pp. 37–61.
335.
RevelleW. (2008a). Association for research in personality: The home for psychological generalists.P: The Online Newsletter 100 for Personality Science, 1, 1–5. 101
336.
RevelleW. (2008b). The contribution of reinforcement sensitivity 102 theory to personality theory. In CorrP. J. (Ed.), The reinforce– 103 ment sensitivity theory of personality (pp. 508–527). Cambridge 104 University Press, Cambridge.
337.
RevelleW. & WiltJ. (2016). The data box and within subject analyses: A comment on Nesselroade and Molenaar. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 51, 419–421.
338.
RieseH., SniederH., JeronimusB. F., KorhonenT., RoseR. J., KaprioJ., & OrmelJ. (2014). Timing of stressful life events affects stability and change of neuroticism. European Journal of Personality, 28(2), 193–200. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1929
339.
RimfeldK., AyorechZ., DaleP. S., KovasY., & PlominR. (2016). Genetics affects choice of academic subjects as well as achievement. Scientific Reports, 6, 26373.
340.
RissanenJ. (2007). Information and complexity in statistical modeling. New York: Springer.
341.
RobertsB. W. & DelVecchioW. F. (2000). The rank–order consistency of personality traits from childhood to old age: A quantitative review of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 3–25.
342.
RobertsB. W., KuncelN. R., ShinerR., CaspiA., & GoldbergL. R. (2007). The power of personality: The comparative validity of personality traits, socioeconomic status, and cognitive ability for predicting important life outcomes. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2, 313–345. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745–6916.2007.00047.x
343.
RobertsB.W., LuoJ., BrileyD.A., ChowP.L., SuR., HillP.L. (2017). A systematic review of personality trait change through intervention. Psychological Bulletin, 143(2), 117–141. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000088
344.
RobinsR. W., TracyJ. L., TrzesniewskiK., PotterJ., & GoslingS. D. (2001). Personality correlates of self–esteem. Journal of Research in Personality, 35, 463–482. https://doi.org/_Hlk48883315110.1006/jrpe.2001.2324
345.
Rodriguez–SeijasC., EatonN. R., & KruegerR. F. (2015). How transdiagnostic factors of personality and psychopathology can inform clinical assessment and intervention. Journal of Personality Assessment, 97(5), 425–435.
346.
RosenthalV. (2004). Microgenesis, immediate experience and visual processes in reading. In CarsettiA. (Ed.), Seeing, thinking and knowing—Meaning and self–organisation in visual cognition and thought (pp. 221–243). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
347.
RothbartM. K. (2011). Becoming who we are: Temperament and personality in development. New York: Guilford Press.
348.
RubensteinP. K., WeichwaldS., BongersS., MooijJ. M., JanzingD., Grosse–WentrupM., SchölkopfB. (2017). Causal consistency of structural equation models. Paper presented at the 33rd Annual Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, Sydney, Australia. https://arxiv.org/abs/1707.00819v1
349.
RussellJ. J., MoskowitzD.S., ZuroffD. C., SookmanD., & ParisJ. (2007). Stability and variability of affective experience and interpersonal behavior in borderline personality disorder. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 116, 578–588.
350.
SadikajG., MoskowitzD., RussellJ. J., ZuroffD. C., & ParisJ. (2013). Quarrelsome behavior in borderline personality disorder: Influence of behavioral and affective reactivity to perceptions of others. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 122(1), 195–207.
351.
SadikajG., RussellJ. J., MoskowitzD., & ParisJ. (2010). Affect dysregulation in individuals with borderline personality disorder: Persistence and interpersonal triggers. Journal of Personality Assessment, 92(6), 490–500.
352.
SaltzJ. B. (2011). Natural genetic variation in social environment choice: Context–dependent gene–environment correlation in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution, 65(8), 2325–2334.26373
353.
SaltzJ. B. (2013). Genetic composition of social groups influences male aggressive behaviour and fitness in natural genotypes of Drosophila melanogaster. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 280(1771), 20131926.
354.
SaltzJ. B. (2017). Genetic variation in social environment construction influences the development of aggressive behavior in Drosophila melanogaster. Heredity, 118(4), 340–347.
355.
ScarrS., & McCartneyK. (1983). How people make their own environments: A theory of genotype→ environment effects. Child Development, 424–435.
356.
Schermelleh–EngelK., KeithN., MoosbruggerH., & HodappV. (2004). Decomposing person and occasion–specific effects: An extension of latent state–trait (LST) theory to hierarchical LST models. Psychological Methods, 9, 198–219. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082–989X.9.2.198
357.
SchlomerG. L., Del GiudiceM., & EllisB. J. (2011). Parent–offspring conflict theory: An evolutionary framework for understanding conflict within human families. Psychological Review, 118, 496–521.
358.
SchmidebergM. (1959). The borderline patient. In: ArietiS. (Ed.), American handbook of psychiatry. Vol. 1. (pp. 398–416). New York: Basic Books.
359.
SchmittmannV. D., CramerA. O., WaldorpL. J., EpskampS., KievitR. A., & BorsboomD. (2013). Deconstructing the construct: A network perspective on psychological phenomena. New Ideas in Psychology, 31, 43–53.
360.
SchultheissO. C., & BrunsteinJ. C. (Eds.). (2010). Implicit motives. New York: Oxford University Press.
361.
ScottW., & CervoneD. (2016). Social cognitive personality assessment: A case conceptualization procedure and illustration. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 23, 79–98.
362.
SearleJ. R. (1998). Mind, language, and society: Philosophy in the real world. New York: Basic Books.
363.
ShackmanA. J., TrompD. P. M., StockbridgeM. D., KaplanC. M., TillmanR. M., & FoxA. S. (2016). Dispositional negativity: An integrative psychological and neurobiological perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 142, 1275–1314. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000073
364.
ShedlerJ., BeckA., FonagyP., GabbardG. O., GundersonJ. G., KernbergO., MichelsR., & WestenD. (2010). Personality disorders in DSM–5. American Journal of Psychiatry, 167, 1027–1028.
365.
SherK. J. (1991). Children of alcoholics: A critical appraisal of theory and research. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
366.
ShermanR. A., & SerfassD. G. (2015). The comprehensive approach to analyzing multivariate constructs. Journal of Research in Personality, 54, 40–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2014.05.002
367.
ShinerR. L. (2014). The development of temperament and personality traits in childhood and adolescence. In MikulincerM., & ShaverP. (Eds.), M. L. Cooper, & R. Larsen (Assoc. Eds.), APA handbook of personality and social psychology: Vol. 3. Personality processes and individual differences (pp. 85–105). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
368.
ShinerR. L., & DeYoungC. G. (2013). The structure of temperament and personality traits: A developmental perspective. In ZelazoP. (Ed.), Oxford handbook of developmental psychology (pp. 113–141). New York: Oxford University Press.
369.
ShodaY., & MischelW. (2000). Reconciling contextualism with the core assumptions of personality psychology. European Journal of Personality, 14(5), 407–428. https://doi.org/10.1002/1099–0984(200009/10)
370.
SihA., & Del GiudiceM. (2012). Linking behavioural syndromes and cognition: A behavioural ecology perspective. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 367, 2762–2772.
371.
SihA., BellA. M., JohnsonJ. C., & ZiembaR. E. (2004). Behavioral syndromes: An intergrative overiew. Quarterly Review of Biology, 79(3), 241–277.
372.
SihA., BellA. M., & JohnsonJ. C. (2004). Behavioral syndromes: An ecological and evolutionary overview. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 19(7), 372–378.
373.
SihA., MathotK.J., MoironM., MontiglioP.O., WolfM., & DingemanseN.J. (2015). Animal personality and state–behaviour feedbacks: A review and guide for empiricists. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 30, 50–60.
374.
SinghJ. K., MisraG., & De RaadB. (2013). Personality structure in the trait lexicon of Hindi, a major language spoken in India. European Journal of Personality, 27, 605–620.
375.
SliwinskiM. J., MogleJ. A., HyunJ., MunozE., SmythJ. M., & LiptonR. B. (2016). Reliability and validity of ambulatory cognitive assessments. Assessment, 1073191116643164.
376.
SmillieL. D., 2014. What is reinforcement sensitivity? Neuroscience paradigms for approach–avoidance processes in personality. European Journal of Personality22 (359–384). https://doi.org/10.1002/per.674
377.
SmillieL. D., CooperA. J., WiltJ., & RevelleW. (2012). Do extraverts get more bang for the buck? Refining the affective–reactivity hypothesis of extraversion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 306–337.
378.
SmithS. M., NicholsT. E., VidaurreD., WinklerA. M., BehrensT. E. J., GlasserM. F., … MillerK. L. (2015). A positive–negative mode of population covariation links brain connectivity, demographics and behavior. Nature Neuroscience, 18(11), 1565–1567. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4125
379.
SnowN. (2015). Picturing moral sensitivity: Insights from Murdoch and Cervone. In MowrerD. & VandenbergP. (Eds.), Developing moral sensitivity (pp. 58–75). New York, NY: Routledge.
380.
SotoC. J. (2016). The little six personality dimensions from early childhood to early adulthood: Mean–level age and gender differences in parents’ reports. Journal of Personality, 84(4), 409–422.
381.
SotoC. J., & JohnO. P. (2017). The next Big Five Inventory (BFI–2): Developing and assessing a hierarchical model with 15 facets to enhance bandwidth, fidelity, and predictive power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113, 117–143.
382.
SotoC. J., & TackettJ. L. (2015). Personality traits in childhood and adolescence: Structure, development, and outcomes. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24(5), 358–362.
383.
SouthS. C., EatonN. R., & KruegerR. F. (2010). The connections between personality and psychopathology. In MillonT., KruegerR., & SimonsenE. (Eds.), Contemporary directions in psychopathology: Scientific foundations of the DSM–V and ICD–11 (2nd ed., pp. 242–262). New York: Guilford Publications.
384.
StampsJ.A., & GroothuisT.G.G. (2010). The development of animal personality: Relevance, concepts and perspectives. Biological Reviews, 85, 301–325.
385.
SteinL. R., TrappR. M., & BellA. M. (2016). Do reproduction and parenting influence personality traits? Insights from threespine stickleback. Animal Behaviour, 112, 247–254.
386.
SteinleyD., HoffmanM., BruscoM., & SherK. (in press). A method for making inferences in network analysis: Comment on Forbes, Wright, Markon, and Krueger (2017). Journal of Abnormal Psychology.
387.
SternW. (1911). Die differentielle Psychologie in ihren methodischen Grundlagen (2. Auflage). [Differential psychology in its methodological foundations (2nd ed)]. Barth, Leipzig.
388.
SteyerR., SchmittM., & EidM. (1999). Latent state–trait theory and research in personality and individual differences. European Journal of Personality, 13, 389–408.
389.
StoneM. (1993). Abnormalities of personality. NY: W. W. Norton.
390.
StoneM. (2013). Treatment of personality disorders from the perspective of the five–factor model. In WidigerT. A. & CostaP. T. (Eds.), Personality disorders and the five–factor model (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
391.
SunJ., StevensonK., KabbaniR., RichardsonB., & SmillieL. D. (2017). The pleasure of making a difference: Perceived social contribution explains the relation between extraverted behavior and positive affect. Emotion, 17, 794–810.
392.
TackettJ. L., & LaheyB. B. (2017). Neuroticism. In WidigerT. A. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of the five factor model (pp. 39–56). New York: Oxford University Press.
393.
ThomsonG. H. (1916). A hierarchy without a general factor. British Journal of Psychology, 8, 271–281
394.
TisakJ., & TisakM. S. (2000). Permanency and ephemerality of psychological measures with application to organizational commitment. Psychological Methods, 5, 175–198. https://doi.org/10.1037//1082–989X.5.2.175
395.
ToobyJ., & CosmidesL. (2015). The theoretical foundations of evolutionary psychology. In BussD. M. (Ed.), The handbook of evolutionary psychology (2nd ed.) (pp. 3–87). New York, NY: Wiley.
396.
TriversR. L. (1974). Parent–offspring conflict. Integrative and Comparative Biology, 14, 249–264.
397.
TrullT. J., SolhanM. B., TragesserS. L., JahngS., WoodP. K., PiaseckiT. M., WatsonD. (2008). Affective instability: Measuring a core feature of borderline personality disorder with ecological momentary assessment. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 117, 647–661.
398.
TrullT. J. & Ebner–PriemerU. W. (2013). Ambulatory assessment. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 9, 151–176.
399.
Tucker–DrobE. M. (in press). Theoretical concepts in the genetics of expertise. In HambrickD. Z., CampitelliG., &MacnamaraB.(Editors),The science of expertise: Behavioral, neural, and genetic approaches to complex skill. Routledge.
400.
wTucker–DrobE. M., & BrileyD. A. (in press). Theoretical concepts in the genetics of personality development. In McAdamsDan P., ShinerRebecca L., and TackettJennifer L. (Eds.) Handbook of personality development. Guildford.
401.
TulvingE. (1983). Elements of episodic memory. Oxford and New York: Clarendon Press and Oxford University Press.
402.
UherJ. (2011). Individual behavioral phenotypes: An integrative meta–theoretical framework. Why ‘behavioral syndromes’ are not analogues of ‘personality’. Developmental Psychobiology, 53, 521–548.
403.
UherJ. (2013). Personality psychology: Lexical approaches, assessment methods, and trait concepts reveal only half of the story. Why it is time for a paradigm shift. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 47, 1–55.
404.
UherJ. (2015a). Conceiving “personality”: Psychologists’ challenges and basic fundamentals of the transdisciplinary philosophy–of–science paradigm for research on individuals. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 49, 398–458.
405.
UherJ. (2015b). Developing “personality” taxonomies: Metatheoretical and methodological rationales underlying selection approaches, methods of data generation and reduction principles. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 49, 531–589.
406.
UherJ. (2015c). Interpreting “personality” taxonomies: Why previous models cannot capture individual–specific experiencing, behaviour, functioning and development. Major taxonomic tasks still lay ahead. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 49, 600–655.
407.
UherJ. (2016). Exploring the workings of the psyche: metatheoretical and methodological foundation. In ValsinerJ., MarsicoG., ChaudharyN., SatoT., & DazzaniV. (Eds.), Psychology as the Science of Human Being: the Yokohama Manifesto. Annals of theoretical psychology Vol. 13 (pp. 299–324). Cham, Springer International. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21094-0_18
408.
UherJ. (in press). The transdisciplinary philosophy–of–science paradigm for research on individuals: Foundations for the science of personality and individual differences. In Zeigler–HillV. & ShackelfordT. K. (Eds). The SAGE handbook of personality and individual differences. Vol. 1. The science of personality and individual differences. Part 1: Theoretical perspectives on personality and individual differences. London, UK: Sage.
409.
UherJ., & VisalberghiE. (2016). Observations versus assessments of personality: A five–method multi–species study reveals numerous biases in ratings and methodological limitations of standardised assessments. Journal of Research in Personality, 61, 61–79.
VanhalstJ., SoenensB., LuyckxK., Van PetegemS., WeeksM. S., & AsherS. R. (2015). Why do the lonely stay lonely? Chronically lonely adolescents’ attributions and emotions in situations of social inclusion and exclusion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109, 932–948. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000051
412.
WatsonD., WieseD., VaidyaJ. & TellegenA. (1999). The two general activation systems of affect: Structural findings, evolutionary considerations, and psychobiological evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 820–838.
413.
WeinerN. (1988). The human use of human beings. Cybernetics and society (3rd ed.). Boston: Da Capo Press.
414.
WenzelM. & KubiakT. (in press). Ambulatory monitoring and ambulatory assessment in personality research. In Zeigler–HillV. & ShackelfordT. (Eds.), SAGE handbook of personality and individual differences.
415.
WhelanD. C., & ZelenskiJ. M. (2012). Experimental evidence that positive moods cause sociability. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3, 430–437.
416.
WichersM., WigmanJ.T.W., Myin–GermeysI. (2015). Micro–level affect dynamics in psychopathology viewed from complex dynamical system theory. Emotion Review, 7(4), 362–367. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073915590623
417.
WidigerT. A. (Ed.). (2017). The Oxford handbook of the Five–Factor Model. NY: Oxford University Press.
418.
WidigerT. A., & LynamD. R. (1998). Psychopathy from the perspective of the five–factor model of personality. In MillonT., SimonsenE., Birket–SmithM., & DavisR.D. (Eds.), Psychopathy: Antisocial, criminal, and violent behaviors (pp. 171–187). NY: Guilford.
419.
WidigerT. A., & TrullT. J. (2007). Plate tectonics in the classification of personality disorder: Shifting to a dimensional model. American Psychologist, 62, 71–83.
420.
WidigerT. A., GoreW. L., CregoC., RojasS. L., & OltmannsJ. R. (2017). Five factor model and personality disorder. In WidigerT. A. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of the five factor model (pp. 449–478). NY: Oxford University Press.
421.
WildB., EichlerM., FriederichH.–C., HartmannM., ZipfelS., & HerzogW. (2010). A graphical vector autoregressive modelling approach to the analysis of electronic diary data. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 10(1), 1.
422.
WiltJ., & RevelleW. (2017). Extraversion. In WidigerT. A. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of the five factor model (pp. 57–82). New York: Oxford University Press.
423.
WiltJ., FunkhouserK., RevelleW., 2011. The dynamic relationships of affective synchrony to perceptions of situations. Journal of Research in Personality45, 309–321.
424.
WolfM., & WeissingF. J. (2012). Animal personalities: Consequences for ecology and evolution. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 27, 452–461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2012.05.001
425.
WolfM., & WeissingF.J. (2010). An explanatory framework for adaptive personality differences. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 365, 3959–3968.
426.
WoodD., & DenissenJ. J. A. (2015). A functional perspective on personality trait development. In BranscombeN. R. & ReynoldsK. (Eds.), Psychology of change: Life contexts, experiences, and identities. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
427.
WoodD., GardnerM. H., & HarmsP. D. (2015). How functionalist and process approaches to behavior can explain trait covariation. Psychological Review, 122, 84–111.
428.
WrightA. G. C., & SimmsL. J. (2014). On the structure of personality disorder traits: Conjoint analyses of the CAT–PD, PID–5, and NEO–PI–3 trait models. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 5(1), 43–54.
429.
WrightA. G. C., HopwoodC. J., & ZanariniM. C. (2015). Associations between changes in normal personality traits and borderline personality disorder symptoms over 16 years. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 6(1), 1–11.
430.
WrightA. G. C., PincusA. L., & LenzenwegerM. F. (2011). Development of personality and the remission and onset of personality pathology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(6), 1351–1358.
431.
WrightA. G. C., PincusA. L., & LenzenwegerM. F. (2013). A parallel process growth model of avoidant personality disorder symptoms and personality traits. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 4(3), 230–238.
432.
WrightA. G. C., SteppS. D., ScottL. N., HallquistM. N., BeeneyJ. E., LazarusS., & PilkonisP. A. (in press). The effect of pathological narcissism on interpersonal and affective processes in social interactions. Journal of Abnormal Psychology.
433.
WrightA.G.C., PincusA.L., ThomasK.M., HopwoodC.J., MarkonK.E., & KruegerR.F. (2013). Conceptions of narcissism and the DSM–5 pathological personality traits. Assessment, 20(3), 339–352.
434.
WrzusC., & RobertsB. W. (2017). Processes of personality development in adulthood: The TESSeRa framework. Personality and Social Psychology Review.
435.
WrzusC., WagnerG. G., & RiedigerM. (2015). Personality–situation transactions from adolescence to old age. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110, 782–99. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000054
436.
YancharS.C. & SlifeB.D. (1997). Pursuing unity in a fragmented psychology: Problems and prospects. Review of General Psychology, 1,235–255.
437.
ZawadzkiM. J., SmythJ. M., SliwinskiM. J., RuizJ. M., & GerinW. (2017). Revisiting the lack of association between affect and physiology: Contrasting between–person and within–person analyses. Health Psychology, 36, 811–818.
438.
ZelenskiJ. M. (2007). Experimental approaches to individual differences and change: Exploring the causes and consequences of extraversion. In OngA. D. and Van DulmanM. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of methods in positive psychology (pp. 205–219). New York: Oxford University Press.