AckermanP. L., & HeggestadE. D. (1997). Intelligence, personality, and interests: Evidence for overlapping traits. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 219–245.
2.
AjzenI., & FishbeinM. (1977). Attitude–behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 888. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033–2909.84.5.888
3.
AllportG. W. (1961). Pattern and growth in personality. New York: Holt Rinehart & Winston, Inc.
4.
AndersenS. M., & ChenS. (2002). The relational self: An interpersonal social–cognitive theory. Psychological Review, 109, 619–645.
5.
AronsonE. (2010). Not by chance alone: My life as a social psychologist. New York: Basic Books.
6.
ArthurW.Jr., WoehrD. J., & MaldegenR. (2000). Convergent and discriminant validity of assessment center dimensions: A conceptual and empirical reexamination of the assessment center construct–related validity paradox. Journal of Management, 26, 813–835.
7.
AshtonM. C., & LeeK. (2009). The HEXACO–60: A short measure of the major dimensions of personality. Journal of Personality Assessment, 91, 340–345.
8.
BaardS. K., RenchT. A., & KozlowskiS. W. J. (2014). Performance adaptation: A theoretical integration and review. Journal of Management, 40, 48–99.
9.
BackM. D., & EgloffB. (2009). Yes we can! A plea for direct behavioral observation in personality research. European Journal of Personality, 23, 403–405.
10.
BackM. D., SchmukleS. C. & EgloffB. (2009). Predicting actual behavior from the explicit and implicit self–concept of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 533–548.
11.
BackM. D., SchmukleS. C. & EgloffB. (2010). Why are narcissists so charming at first sight?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 132–145
12.
BarrickM. R., & MountM. K. (1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta–analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1–26.
13.
BatemanT. S., & CrantJ. M. (1993). The proactive component of organizational behavior: A measure and correlates. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 14, 103–118.
14.
BaumeisterR. F. (1982). A self–presentational view of social phenomena. Psychological Bulletin, 91, 3–26.
15.
BaumeisterR. F., VohsK. D., & FunderD. C. (2007). Psychology as the science of self–reports and finger movements. Whatever happened to actual behavior?Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2, 396–403.
16.
BaumertA., HalmburgerA., & SchmittM. (2013). Interventions against norm violations: Dispositional determinants of self–reported and real moral courage. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 1053–1068.
17.
BeckA. T., FreemanA., & DavisD. D. (2015). Cognitive therapy of personality disorders. New York: Guilford.
18.
BemD. J. (1983). Constructing a theory of the triple typology: Some (second) thoughts on nomothetic and idiographic approaches to personality. Journal of Personality, 51, 566–577.
19.
Ben–PorathY. S., & TellegenA. (1990). A place for traits in stress research. Psychological Inquiry, 1, 14–17.
20.
BerryC. M., SackettP. R., & TobaresV. (2010). A meta–analysis of conditional reasoning tests of aggression. Personnel Psychology, 63, 361–384.
21.
BlackieL. E. R. & JayawickremeE. (2015). The example of adverse life experiences as unique situations. European Journal of Personality, 29, 285–386.
22.
BlackieL. E. R., JayawickremeE., TsukayamaE., ForgeardM. J., RoepkeA. M., & FleesonW. (in press). Post–traumatic growth as positive personality change: Developing a measure to assess within–person variability. Journal of Research in Personality.
23.
BledowR., & FreseM. (2009). A situational judgment test of personal initiative: Towards understanding construct based situational judgment tests. Personnel Psychology, 62, 229–258.
24.
BleidornW., Buyukcan–TetikA., SchwabaT., van ScheppingenM. A., DenissenJ. J. A., & FinkenauerC. (2016). Stability and change in self–esteem during the transition to parenthood. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7, 560–569.
25.
BleidornW., HopwoodC. J., & WrightA. G. (2017). Using big data to advance personality theory. Manuscript submitted for publication.
26.
BlumG., & SchmittM. (2017). The Nonlinear Interaction of Person and Situation (NIPS) model and its values for a psychology of situations. In The Oxford handbook of psychological situations. Oxford University Press.
27.
BöckenholtU. (2012). Modeling multiple response processes in judgment and choice. Psychological Methods, 17, 665–678. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028111
28.
BolgerN., & SchillingE. A. (1991). Personality and problems of everyday life: The role of neuroticism in exposure and reactivity to daily stressors. Journal of Personality, 59, 355–386.
29.
BorkenauP., RiemannR., AngleitnerA., & SpinathF. M. (2001). Genetic and environmental influences on observed personality: Evidence from the German observational study of adults twins. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 655–668.
30.
BormanW. C. (1974). The rating of individuals in organizations: An alternative approach. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 12, 105–124.
31.
BornsteinR. F. (2009). Heisenberg, Kandinsky, and the heteromethod convergence problem: Lessons from within and beyond psychology. Journal of Personality Assessment, 91, 1–8.
32.
BouchardT. J. (2016). Experience producing drive theory: Personality “writ large”. Personality and Individual Differences, 90, 302–314.
33.
BowersK. S. (1973). Situationism in psychology: An analysis and a critique. Psychological Review, 80, 307–336.
34.
BowlerM. C., & WoehrD. J. (2006). A meta–analytic evaluation of the impact of dimension and exercise factors on assessment center ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 1114–1124.
35.
BrownA., & Maydeu–OlivaresA. (2011). Item response modeling of forced–choice questionnaires. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 71, 460–502. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164410375112
36.
BrunswikE. (1955). Representative design and probabilistic theory in a functional psychology. Psychological Review, 62, 193–217.
37.
BrunswikE. (1956). Perception and the representative design of psychological experiments. Berkeley: University of California Press.
38.
CampionM. C., & PloyhartR. E. (2013). Assessing personality with situational judgment measures: Interactionist psychology operationalized. In ChristiansenN. D. & TettR. P. (Eds.), Handbook of personality at work (pp. 439–456). New York, NY: Routledge.
39.
CarlsonK. D., & JiF. X. (2011). Citing and building on meta–analytic findings: A review and recommendations. Organizational Research Methods, 14, 696–717.
40.
CarverC. S., & ScheierM. F. (1998). On the self–regulation of behavior. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
41.
CaspiA. (1998). Personality development across life course. In DamonW. (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 311–388). New York: Wiley.
ChabrisC. F., LeeJ. J., CesariniD., BenjaminD. J., & LaibsonD. I. (2015). The fourth law of behavior genetics. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24, 304–312. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721415580430
44.
ChristianM. S., EdwardsB. D., & BradleyJ. C. (2010). Situational judgment tests: Constructs assessed and a meta–analysis of their criterion–related validities. Personnel Psychology, 63, 83–117.
45.
ChristiansenN. D. & RobieC. (2011). Further consideration of the usefulness of narrow trait factors. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 43, 183–194.
46.
ChristiansenN., HoffmanB. J., LievensF., & SpeerA. (2013). Assessment centers and the measurement of personality. In ChristiansenN. & TettR. (Eds.) Handbook of personality at work. (477–497). New York (NY): Routledge.
47.
ClarkA. (2015). Surfing uncertainty: Prediction, action, and the embodied mind. New York: Oxford.
48.
CleetonG., & KnightF. (1924). Validity of character judgments based on external criteria. Journal of Applied Psychology, 8, 215–231.
49.
CoasterJ. A. & ChristiansenN.D. (2011). Usefulness of O*NET work styles for determining personality–based job requirements. Paper presented in D.L. Sandall (chair) Adequacy of O*NET Framework Work Styles at the 27th annual meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, in Chicago, IL.
50.
ColemanJ. S. & FararoT. J. (1992). Rational choice theory: Advocacy and critique. Newbury Park: Sage.
51.
ColvinC. R. (1993a). “Judgable” people: Personality, behavior, and competingexplanations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 861–873.
52.
ColvinC. R. (1993b). Childhood antecedents of young–adult judgability. Journal of Personality, 61, 611–635.
53.
ConnellyB. S. (2013). Personality from the perspective of the observer: Implications for personality research and practice at work. In ChristiansenN. & TettR. (Eds). Handbook of personality at work. New York, Taylor–Francis/Routledge Press.
54.
ConnellyB. S., & OnesD. S. (2010). Another perspective on personality: Meta–analytic integration of observers’ accuracy and predictive validity. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 1092–1122.
55.
CooperW. H., & WitheyM. J. (2009). The strong situation hypothesis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13, 62–72.
56.
CorrP. J. (2009). Behaviour functions in personality psychology. European Journal of Personality, 23, 403–435.
57.
CostaP.T.Jr., & McCraeR. R. (1980). Still stable after all these years: Personality as a key to some issues in adulthood and old age. In BaltesP. B. & BrimO. G.Jr. (Eds.), Lifespandevelopment and behavior (Vol. 3, pp. 65–102). New York: Academic Press.
58.
CreswellK. G., BachrachR. L., WrightA. G., PintoA., & AnsellE. (2016). Predicting problematic alcohol use with the DSM–5 alternative model of personality pathology. Personality disorders, 7, 103–111.
59.
CronbachL. J. (1957). The two disciplines of scientific psychology. American Psychologist, 12, 671–684.
60.
CronbachL. J., RajaratnamN., & GleserG. C. (1963). Theory of generalizability: A liberalization of reliability theory. British Journal of Statistical Psychology, 16, 137–163.
61.
CronbachL. J., GleserG. C., NandaH., & RajaratnamN. (1972). The dependability of behavioral measurements: Theory of generalizability for scores and profiles. New York: Wiley.
62.
CulbertsonS. S., WeyhrauchW. S., & HuffcuttA. I. (2017). A tale of two formats: Direct comparison of matching situational and behavior description interview questions. Human Resource Management Review, 27, 167–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2016.09.009
63.
DalalR. S., MeyerR. D., BradshawR. P., GreenJ. P., KellyE. D., & ZhuM. (2015). Personality strength and situational influences on behavior: A conceptual review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 41, 261–287.
64.
De FruytF., & SalgadoJ. F. (2003). Editorial: Personality and IWO applications: Introducing personality at work. European Journal of Personality, 17, S1–S3. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.480
De KockF., LievensF., & BornM. Ph. (2015). An in–depth look at dispositional reasoning and interviewer accuracy. Human Performance, 28, 199–221.
67.
De KockF., LievensF., & BornM. Ph. (2017). A closer look at the measurement of dispositional reasoning: Dimensionality and invariance across assessor groups. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 25, 240–252.
68.
DeYoungC. G. (2015). Cybernetic Big Five theory. Journal of Research in Personality, 56, 33–58.
69.
DunlopW. L. (2015). Contextualized personality, beyond traits. European Journal of Personality, 29, 310–325. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1995
70.
EngelhardI. M., LommenM. J., & SijbrandijM. (2015). Changing for better or worse? Posttraumatic growth reported by soldiers deployed to Iraq. Clinical Psychological Science, 3, 789–796.
71.
EpsteinS. (1979). The stability of behavior: I. On predicting most of the people much of the time. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1097. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022–3514.37.7.1097
72.
EysenckH. J. (1997). Personality and experimental psychology: The unification of psychology and the possibility of a paradigm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1224–1237.
73.
FewL. R., MillerJ. D., RothbaumA. O., MellerS., MaplesJ., TerryD. P., … MackillopJ. (2013). Examination of the Section Iii Dsm–5 diagnostic system for personality disorders in an outpatient clinical sample. Journal of abnormal psychology, 122, 1057–1069.
74.
FishbeinM., & AjzenI. (1974). Attitudes toward objects as predictors of single and multiple behavioral criteria. Psychological Review, 81, 59–74.
75.
FishbeinM., & AjzenI. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison–Wesley Pub.
76.
FiskeS. T., & MacraeC. N. (Eds.). (2012). The Sage handbook of social cognition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
77.
FleesonW. (2001). Toward a structure–and process–integrated view of personality: Traits as density distributions of states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 1011–1027.
78.
FleesonW. (2007). Situation–based contingencies underlying trait–content manifestation in behavior. Journal of Personality, 75, 825–862.
79.
FleesonW. (2014). Four ways of (not) being real and whether they are essential for post–traumatic growth. European Journal of Psychology, 28, 336–337.
80.
FleesonW., & GallagherP. (2009). The implications of Big Five standing for the distribution of trait manifestation in behavior: Fifteen experience–sampling studies and a meta–analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 1097–1114.
81.
FleesonW., & JayawickremeE. (2015). Whole trait theory. Journal of Research in Personality, 56, 82–92.
82.
FournierM. A., MoskowitzD. S., & ZuroffD. C. (2008). Integrating dispositions, signatures, and the interpersonal domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 531–545.
83.
FournierM. A., MoskowitzD. S., & ZuroffD. C. (2009). The interpersonal signature. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 155–162.
84.
FrazierP., CoyneJ. & TennenH. (2014). Post–traumatic growth: A call for less, but better, research. European Journal of Psychology, 28, 337–338.
85.
FrederiksenN. (1972). Toward a taxonomy of situations. American Psychologist, 27, 114–123.
86.
FristonK. (2010). The free–energy principle: A unified brain theory?Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11, 127–138.
87.
FunderD. C. (1991). Global traits: A neo–Allportian approach to personality. Psychological Science, 2, 31–39.
88.
FunderD. C. (1995). On the accuracy of personality judgment: A realisticapproach. Psychological Review, 102, 652–670.
89.
FunderD. C. (1999). Personality judgment: A realistic approach to person perception. San Diego: Academic Press.
90.
FunderD. C. (2006). Towards a resolution of the personality triad: Persons, situations, and behaviors. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 21–34.
91.
FunderD. C. (2016). Taking situations seriously: The situation construal model and the riverside situational Q–sort. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 25, 203–208.
92.
FunderD. C., & ColvinC. R. (1991). Explorations in behavioral consistency: Properties of persons, situations, and behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 773–794. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022–3514.60.5.773
93.
FurrR. M. (2009). The study of behaviour in personality psychology: Meaning, importance and measurement. European Journal of Personality, 23, 437–453.
94.
GeukesK., NestlerS., HuttemanR., KüfnerA. C. P., & BackM. D. (2017). Trait personality and state variability: Predicting individual differences in within– and cross–context fluctuations in affect, self–evaluations, and behavior in everyday life. Journal of Research in Personality, 69, 124–138.
95.
GibbonsA. M. & RuppD. E. (2009). Dimension consistency as an individual difference: A new (old) perspective on the assessment center construct validity debate. Journal of Management, 35, 1154–1180.
96.
GroveW. M., & TellegenA. (1991). Problems in the classification of personality disorders. Journal of Personality Disorders, 5, 31–41.
97.
HalberstadtA. G. (1983). Family expressiveness styles and nonverbal communicationskills. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 8, 14–26.
98.
HandlerC. (2013). Foreword. In FetzerM. S. & TuzinskiK.A. (Eds.), Simulations for personnel selection (pp. v–ix). New York: Springer.
99.
HerdeC. N., & LievensF. (2016). The added value of speed assessment for assessing leadership: In. P. V. Ingold, & B. J. Hoffman (Chair), AC, Quo Vadis? Novel assessment center design and validation strategies. Symposium conducted at the Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Anaheim, CA, USA.
100.
HighhouseS., & HarrisM. M. (1993). The measurement of assessment center situations: Bem's template matching technique for examining exercise similarity. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23, 140–155.
101.
HirschmüllerS., EgloffB., SchmukleS. C., NestlerS., & BackM. D. (2015). Accurate judgments of neuroticism at zero acquaintance: A question of relevance. Journal of Personality, 83, 221–228.
102.
HoffmanB. J., & WoehrD. J. (2009). Disentangling the meaning of multisource performance rating source and dimension factors. Personnel Psychology, 62, 735–765.
103.
HofmannW., GschwendnerT., NosekB. A., & SchmittM. (2005). What moderates implicit—Explicit consistency?European Review of Social Psychology, 16, 335–390.
104.
HoganR. (1996). A socioanalytic interpretation of the five–factor model. In WigginsJ. S. (Ed.), The five–factor model of personality (pp. 163–179). New York: Guilford.
105.
HohwyJ. (2013). The predictive mind. New York: Oxford University Press.
106.
HopwoodC. J. & BornsteinR. F. (2014). Multimethod clinical assessment. New York, NY: Guilford.
107.
HopwoodC. J., MaloneJ. C., AnsellE. B., SanislowC. A., GriloC. M., McGlashanT. H., … & GundersonJ. G. (2011). Personality assessment in DSM–5: Empirical support for rating severity, style, and traits. Journal of Personality Disorders, 25, 305–320.
108.
HorstmannK. T., RauthmannJ. F., & ShermanR. A. (2017). The measurement of situational influences. In Zeigler–HillV. and ShackelfordT. K. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of personality and individual differences.
109.
HoughL. M., EatonN. K., DunnetteM. D., KampJ. D., & McCloyR. A. (1990). Criterion–related validities of personality constructs and the effect of response distortion on those validities. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 581–595.
110.
HumanL. J., & BiesanzJ. C. (2011). Target adjustment and self–other agreement: Utilizing trait observability to disentangle judgeability and self–knowledge. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 202–216.
111.
HumanL. J., & BiesanzJ. C. (2013). Targeting the good target: An integrative review of the characteristics and consequences of being accurately perceived. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 17, 248–272.
112.
HumanL. J., BiesanzJ. C., ParisottoK. L., & DunnE. W. (2012). Your best self helps reveal your true self: Positive self–presentation leads to more accurate personalityimpressions. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3, 23–30.
113.
HumanL. J., SandstromG. M., BiesanzJ. C., & DunnE. W. (2013). Accurate first impressions leave a lasting impression: The long–term effects of distinctive self–otheragreement on relationship development. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4, 395–402.
114.
HumanL. J., BiesanzJ. C., FinsethS. M., PierceB., & LeM. (2014). To thine own self rue: Psychological adjustment promotes judgeability via personality–behavior congruence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106, 286–303.
115.
HunterJ. E., & SchmidtF. L. (2004). Methods of meta–analysis: Correcting for error and bias in research findings. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
116.
IckesW., SnyderM., & GarciaS. (1997). Personality influences on the choice of situations. In HoganR., JohnsonJ., & BriggsS. (Eds.) Handbook of personality psychology (pp. 165–195). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
117.
InfurnaF. J., & LutharS. S. (2016). Resilience to major life stressors is not as common as thought. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11, 175–194.
118.
International Taskforce on Assessment Center Guidelines (2015). Guidelines and ethical considerations for assessment center operations. Journal of Management, 41, 1244–1273.
119.
JamesL. R. (1998). Measurement of personality via conditional reasoning. Organizational Research Methods, 2, 131–163.
120.
JamesL. R., & McIntyreM. D. (2000). Conditional reasoning test of aggression test manual. Knoxville, TN: Innovative Assessment Technology.
121.
JanzT. (1982). Initial comparisons of patterned behavior description interviews versus unstructured interviews. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 577–580. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021–9010.67.5.577
122.
JayawickremeE. & BlackieL. E. R. (2014). Post–traumatic growth as positive personality change: Evidence, controversies and future directions. European Journal of Personality, 28,312–31
123.
JohnsonW. (2010). Extending and testing Tom Bouchard's experience producing drive theory. Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 296–301.
124.
JonesA. B., BrownN. A., SerfassD. G., & ShermanR. A. (2014). Traumatic experiences yield changes in the situation experience. European Journal of Personality, 28, 339–340.
125.
KammrathL. K., Mendoza–DentonR., & MischelW. (2005). Incorporating if…then…personality signatures in person perception: Beyond the person–situation dichotomy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 605–618.
126.
KelleyH. H., HolmesJ. G., KerrN. L., ReisH. T., RusbultC. E., & Van LangeP. A. M. (2003). An atlas of interpersonal situations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
127.
KennyD. A., & WestT. V. (2008). Self–perception as interpersonal perception. In WoodJ. V., TesserA., & HolmesJ. G. (Eds.), The self and social relationships. (pp. 119–138). New York: Psychology Press.
128.
KleheU.–C., & LathamG. (2006). What would you do–really or ideally? Constructs underlying the behavior description interview and the situational interview in predicting typical versus maximum performance. Human Performance, 19, 357–382. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327043hup1904_3
129.
KleinmannM. (1997). Transparenz der Anforderungsdimensionen: Ein moderator der Konstrukt und Kriteriumsvalidität [transparency of the required dimensions: A moderator of assessment centers’ construct and criterion validity]. Zeitschrift für Arbeits– und Organisationspsychologie, 41, 171–181.
130.
KlirsE. G., & RevelleW. (1986). Predicting variability from perceived situational similarity. Journal of Research in Personality, 20, 34–50.
131.
KluemperD., McLartyB., & BingM. (2015). Acquaintance ratings of conscientiousness, agreeableness, and emotional stability: Incremental validity beyond and interactive effects with self–reports in the prediction of workplace deviance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100, 237–248.
132.
KluemperD. H., McLartyB. D., & BingM. N. (2017). The validity of friend, family, and coworker ratings of personality. Paper presented at the 32nd annual meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology Conference held in Orlando, FL.
133.
KnafoA., & JaffeeS. R. (2013). Gene–environment correlation in developmental psychopathology. Development and Psychopathology, 25, 1–6.
134.
KotovR., GamezW., SchidtF., & WatsonD. (2010). Linking big personality traits to anxiety, depressive, and substance use disorders: A meta–analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 768–821.
135.
KrummS., LievensF., HüffmeierJ., LipnevichA. A., BendelsH., & HertelG. (2015). How “situational” is judgment in situational judgment tests?Journal of Applied Psychology, 100, 399–416. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037674
KuncelN. R., & SackettP. R. (2014). Resolving the assessment center construct validity problem (as we know it). Journal of Applied Psychology, 99, 38–47. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034147
138.
LanceC. E., NobleC. L., & ScullenS. E. (2002). A critique of the correlated trait–correlated method and correlated uniqueness models for multitrait–multimethod data. Psychological Methods, 7, 228–244. https://doi.org/10.1037//1082–989X.7.2.228
139.
LanceC. E., DawsonB., BirkelbachD., & HoffmanB. J. (2010). Method effects, measurement error, and substantive conclusions. Organizational Research Methods, 13, 435–455.
140.
LangJ. W. B. (2014). A dynamic Thurstonian item response theory of motive expression in the picture story exercise: Solving the internal consistency paradox of the PSE. Psychological Review, 121, 481–500. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037011
141.
LaPiereR. T. (1934). Attitudes versus actions. Social Forces, 13, 230–237.
142.
LawsonC., & MacLeodC. (1999). Depression and the interpretation of ambiguity. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 37, 463–474.
143.
LearyM. R. (1995). Self–presentation: Impression management and interpersonal behavior. Brown & Benchmark Publishers.
144.
LearyT., & CoffeyH. S. (1955). Interpersonal diagnosis: Some problems of methodology and validation. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 50, 110–124.
145.
LeikasS., LönnqvistJ. E., & VerkasaloM. (2012). Persons, situations, and behaviors: Consistency and variability of different behaviors in four interpersonal situations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 1007–1022.
146.
LetzringT. D. (2008). The good judge of personality: Characteristics, behaviors, and observer accuracy. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 914–932.
147.
LevashinaJ., HartwellC. J., MorgesonF. P., & CampionM. A. (2014). The structured employment interview: Narrative and quantitative review of the research literature. Personnel Psychology, 67, 241–293. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12052
148.
LewinK. (1943). Defining the “field at a given time”. Psychological Review, 50, 292–310.
149.
LievensF. (2001). Assessors and use of assessment center dimensions: A fresh look at a troubling issue. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 65, 1–19.
150.
LievensF. (2017). Assessing personality–situation interplay in personnel selection: Towards more integration into personality research. European Journal of Personality,
151.
LievensF. (in press). Construct–driven SJTs: Towards an agenda for future research. International Journal of Testing.
152.
LievensF., & ConwayJ. M. (2001). Dimension and exercise variance in assessment center scores: A large–scale evaluation of multitrait–multimethod studies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 1202–1222.
153.
LievensF., & MotowidloS. J. (2016). Situational judgment tests: From measures of situational judgment to measures of general domain knowledge. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 9, 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2015.71
154.
LievensF. & PeetersH. (2008). Impact of elaboration on responding to situational judgment test items. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 16, 345–355.
155.
LievensF., & SackettP. R. (2012). The validity of interpersonal skills assessment via situational judgment tests for predicting academic success and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 460–468.
156.
LievensF., & SackettP. R. (2017). The effects of predictor method factors on selection outcomes: A modular approach to personnel selection procedures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102, 43–66. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000160
157.
LievensF., ChasteenC.S., DayE.A., & ChristiansenN.D. (2006). Large–scale investigation of the role of trait activation theory for understanding assessment center convergent and discriminant validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 247–258.
158.
LievensF., SchollaertE., & KeenG. (2015). The interplay of elicitation and evaluation of trait–expressive behavior: Evidence in assessment center exercises. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100, 1169–1188.
159.
LilienfeldS. O. (2013). Is psychopathy a syndrome? Commentary on Marcus, Fulton, and Edens. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 4, 85–86.
160.
LönnqvistJ. E., PaunonenS., VerkasaloM., LeikasS., Tuulio–HenrikssonA., & LönnqvistJ. (2007). Personality characteristics of research volunteers. European Journal of Personality, 21, 1017–1030.
161.
LordR. G. (1985). Accuracy in behavioral measurement: An alternative definition based on raters’ cognitive schema and signal detection theory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 66–71.
162.
LowmanG., WoodD., & HarmsP. D. (2017). Assertiveness and power in the workplace: A functional field approach. University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL.
163.
LucasR. E., ClarkA. E., GeorgellisY., & DienerE. (2003). Reexamining adaptation and the set point model of happiness: Reactions to changes in marital status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 527–539.
164.
MacDonaldK. (1995). Evolution, the five–factor model, and levels of personality. Journal of Personality, 63, 525–567.
165.
MacLaneC. N. & CucinaJ. M. (2015). Generalization of cognitive and noncognitive validities across personality–based job families. International Journal of Selection and Assessment23, 316–331
166.
MagnussonD. (1981). Toward a psychology of situations: An interactional perspective. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
167.
ManciniA. D., LittletonH. L., & GrillsA. E. (2016). Can people benefit from acute stress? Social support, psychological improvement, and resilience after the Virginia Tech campus shootings. Clinical Psychological Science, 4, 401–417.
168.
MarkonK. E., KruegerR. F., & WatsonD. (2005). Delineating the structure of normal and abnormal personality: An integrative hierarchical approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 139–157.
169.
McAbeeS. T., & ConnellyB. S. (2016). A multi–rater framework for studying personality: The trait–reputation–identity model. Psychological Review, 123, 569–591. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000035
McCraeR. R. (2015). A more nuanced view of reliability: Specificity in the trait hierarchy. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 19, 97–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868314541857
172.
McCraeR. R., & WeissA. (2007). Observer ratings of personality. In RobinsR. W., FraleyR. C., & KruegerR. (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in personality psychology. (pp. 259–272). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
173.
McCraeR. R., CostaP. T.Jr., & MartinT. A. (2005). The NEO–PI–e: A more readable revised NEO personality inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 84, 261–270.
174.
McDanielM. A., MorgesonF. P., FinneganE. B., CampionM. A., & BravermanE. P. (2001). Use of situational judgment tests to predict job performance: A clarification of the literature. American Psychological Association.
175.
McDanielM. A., ListS. K., & KepesS. (2016). The “hot mess” of situational judgment test construct validity and other issues. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 9, 47–51.
176.
McFarlandL. Y. N. N., YunG. J., HaroldC. M., VieraL., & MooreL. G. (2005). An examination of impression management use and effectiveness across assessment center exercises: The role of competency demands. Personnel Psychology, 58, 949–980.
177.
MeriacJ. P., HoffmanB. J., WoehrD. J., & FleisherM. S. (2008). Further evidence for the validity of assessment center dimensions: A meta–analysis of the incremental criterion–related validity of dimension ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 1042–1052.
178.
MeriacJ. P., HoffmanB. J., & WoehrD. J. (2014). A conceptual and empirical review of the structure of assessment center dimensions. Journal of Management, 40, 1269–1296. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314522299
179.
MeyerR. D., & DalalR. S. (2009). Situational strength as a means of conceptualizing context. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 2, 99–102.
180.
MeyerR. D., DalalR. S., & HermidaR. (2010). A review and synthesis of situational strength in the organizational sciences. Journal of Management, 36, 121–140.
181.
MillerK. E., & RasmussenA. (2014). War experiences, daily stressors and mental health five years on: Elaborations and future directions. Intervention, 12, 33–42.
182.
MischelW. (1968). Personality and assessment. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
183.
MischelW., & ShodaY. (1995). A cognitive–affective system theory of personality: Reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure. Psychological Review, 102, 246–268.
184.
MiskewiczK., FleesonW., Mayfield ArnoldE., LawM.K., MneimneM., & FurrR.M. (2015). A contingency–oriented approach to understanding borderline personality disorder: Situational triggers and symptoms. Journal of Personality Disorders, 29, 486–502. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2015.29.4.486
185.
MooreC., LeeS. Y., KimK., & CableD. M. (2017). The advantage of being oneself: The role of applicant self–verification in organizational hiring decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology. In Press.
186.
MorgesonF. P., CampionM. A., DipboyeR. L., HollenbeckJ. R., MurphyK., & SchmittN. (2007). Reconsidering the use of personality tests in personnel selection contexts. Personnel Psychology, 60, 683–729.
187.
MorseP. J., SauerbergerK. S., ToddE., & FunderD. (2015). Relationships among personality, situational construal and social outcomes. European Journal of Personality, 29, 97–106. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1987
188.
MotowidloS. J., & BeierM. E. (2010). Differentiating specific job knowledge from implicit trait policies in procedural knowledge measured by a SJT. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 321–333.
189.
MotowidloS. J., DunnetteM. D., & CarterG. W. (1990). An alternative selection procedure: The low–fidelity simulation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 640.
190.
MotowidloS. J., HooperA. C., & JacksonH. L. (2006). Implicit policies about relations between personality traits and behavioral effectiveness in situational judgment items. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 749–761.
191.
MõttusR. (2016). Towards more rigorous personality trait–outcome research. European Journal of Personality, 30, 292–303. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2041
192.
MõttusR., KandlerC., BleidornW., RiemannR., & McCraeR. R. (2017a). Personality traits below facets: The consensual validity, longitudinal stability, heritability, and utility of personality nuances. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112, 474–490. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000100
193.
MõttusR., BatesT. C., CondonD. M., MroczekD. K., & RevelleW. (2017b). Your personality data can do more: Items provide leverage for explaining the variance and co–variance of life outcomes. Retrieved from osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/4q9gv
194.
MurphyN. A. (2007). Appearing smart: The impression management of intelligence, person perception accuracy, and behavior in social interaction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 325–339.
195.
MurrayH. A. (1938). Explorations in personality: A clinical and experimental study of fifty men of college age. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
196.
MusselP. (2007). Die Konstruktvalidität des Multimodalen interviews [construct validity of the multimodal employment interview]. Berlin: dissertation.de.
197.
MusselP., GatzkaT., & HewigJ. (2016). Situational judgment tests as an alternative measure for personality assessment. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, https://doi.org/10.1027/1015–5759/a000346
198.
NesselroadeJ. R., & BokerS. M. (1994). Assessing constancy and change. In HeathertonT. & WeinbergerJ. (Eds.), Can personality change? (pp. 121–147). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
199.
OhI.–S., WangG., & MountM. K. (2011). Validity of observer ratings of the five–factor model of personality traits: A meta–analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 762–773.
200.
OnesD. S., & ViswesvaranC. (1996). Bandwidth–fidelity dilemma in personality measurement for personnel selection. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17, 609–626.
201.
ParrigonS., WooS. E., TayL., & WangT. W. (2016). CAPTION–ing the situation: A lexically–derived taxonomy of psychological situation characteristics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000111
202.
PatrickC. J. (in press). Psychopathy as masked pathology. In PatrickC.J. (Ed.), Handbook of psychopathy. New York: Guilford.
203.
PincusA. L. (2011). Some comments on nomology, diagnostic process, and narcissistic personality disorder in the DSM–5 proposal for personality and personality disorders. Personality Disorders, 2, 41–53.
204.
PodsakoffP. M., MacKenzieS. B., LeeJ.–Y., & PodsakoffN. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903.
205.
PodsakoffP. M., MacKenzieS. B., & PodsakoffN. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 539–569.
206.
PoppleA., & LeviD. M. (2000). Wundt versus Galton – two approaches to gathering psychophysical measurements. Perception, 29, 379–381.
207.
PoropatA. & CorrP. J (2015). Thinking bigger: The Cronbachian paradigm and personality theory integration. Journal of Research in Personality, 56, 59–69.
208.
RauthmannJ. F. (2015). Structuring situational information: A road map of the many pathways to different situational taxonomies. European Psychologist, 20, 176–189.
RauthmannJ. F., Gallardo–PujolD., GuillaumeE. M., ToddE., NaveC. S., ShermanR. A., & FunderD. C. (2014). The situational eight DIAMONDS: A taxonomy of major dimensions of situation characteristics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107, 677–718.
211.
RauthmannJ. F., JonesA. B., & ShermanR. A. (2016). Directionality of person–situation transactions: Are there spill–overs among and between situation experiences and personality states?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42, 893–909.
212.
RauthmannJ. F., & ShermanR. A. (2016a). Measuring the situational eight DIAMONDS characteristics of situations: An optimization of the RSQ–8 to the S8*. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 32, 155–164
213.
RauthmannJ. F., & ShermanR. A. (2016b). Ultra–brief measures for the situational eight DIAMONDS domains. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 32, 165–174.
214.
RauthmannJ. F., & ShermanR. A. (2016c). Situation change: Stability and change of situation variables between and within persons. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1938. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01938
215.
RauthmannJ. F., & ShermanR. A. (2017). Normative and distinctive accuracy in situation perceptions: Magnitude and personality correlates. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1–12.
216.
RauthmannJ. F., ShermanR. A., & FunderD. C. (2015). Principles of situation research: Towards a better understanding of psychological situations. European Journal of Personality, 29, 363–381.
217.
RauthmannJ. F., ShermanR. A., NaveC. S., & FunderD. C. (2015). Personality–driven situation experience, contact, and construal: How people's personality traits predict characteristics of their situations in daily life. Journal of Research in Personality, 55, 98–111.
218.
RaymarkP. H., & van IddekingeC. H. (2013). Assessing personality in selection interviews. In ChristiansenN. D. & TettR. P. (Eds.), Handbook of personality at work. New York, NY: Routledge.
219.
ReberR., SchwarzN., & WinkielmanP. (2004). Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: Is beauty in the perceiver's processing experience?. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 364–382.
220.
ReisH. T. (2008). Reinvigorating the concept of situation in social psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12, 311–329.
ReynoldsK. J., TurnerJ.C., BranscombeN. R., MavorK.I., BizumicB., & SubasicE. (2010). Interactionism in personality and social psychology: An integrated approach to understanding the mind and behaviour. European Journal of Personality, 24, 458–482.
223.
RobinsonM. D., & CloreG. L. (2002). Episodic and semantic knowledge in emotional self–report: Evidence for two judgment processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 198–215.
224.
RockstuhlT., AngS., NgK. Y., LievensF., & Van DyneL. (2015). Putting judging situations into situational judgment tests: Evidence from intercultural multimedia SJTs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100, 464–480.
225.
RogersK. H. (2015). The “good dyad”: Examining the impact of personality and behavior on dyadic accuracy in first impressions. (unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
226.
RogersK. H., & BiesanzJ. C. (January, 2016). The good judge revisited: Examining the role of the good target. Poster presented at Society for Personality and Social Psychology, San Diego, CA.
227.
RozinP. (2009). What kind of empirical research should we publish, fund, and reward?: A different perspective. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 435–439.
228.
SackettP. R., & DreherG. F. (1982). Constructs and assessment center dimensions: Some troubling empirical findings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 401–410.
229.
SackettP. R., ZedeckS., & FogliL. (1988). Relations between measures of typical and maximum job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 482–486.
230.
SalgadoJ. F. (1997). The five factor model of personality and job performance in the European Community. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 30–43.
231.
SauerbergerK. S., & FunderD. C. (2016). Behavioral change and consistency across contexts. Journal of Research in Personality.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2016.04.007
232.
ScarrS., & McCartneyK. (1983). How people make their own environments: A theory of genotype→environment effects. Child Development, 54, 424–435.
233.
SchlenkerB. R., & PontariB. A. (2000). The strategic control of information: Impression management and self–presentation in daily life. In TesserA., FelsonR. B., & SulsJ. M. (Eds.), Psychological perspectives on self and identity (pp. 199–232). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
234.
Schmid MastM., Gatica–PerezD., FrauendorferD., NguyenL., & ChoudhuryT. (2015). Social sensing for psychology: Automated interpersonal behavior assessment. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24, 87–92.
235.
SchmidtF. L., OhI. S., & ShafferJ. A. (2016). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 100 years of research findings. Retrieved from Website. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/309203898
236.
SchneiderJ. R., & SchmittN. (1992). An exercise design approach to understanding assessment center dimension and exercise constructs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 32–41.
237.
SchollaertE., & LievensF. (2011). The use of role–player prompts in assessment center exercises. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 19, 190–197.
238.
ShafferJ. A., & PostlethwaiteB. E. (2012). A matter of context: A meta–analytic investigation of the relative validity of contextualized and noncontextualized personality measures. Personnel Psychology, 65, 445–494.
239.
SharpC., WrightA. G. C., FowlerJ. C., FreuhC., AllenJ. G., OldhamJ., & ClarkL. A. (2015). The structure of personality pathology: Both general (‘g’) and specific (‘s’) factors?Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 124, 387–398.
240.
SheldonK. M., & KasserT. (1995). Coherence and congruence: Two aspects of personality integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 531–543.
241.
ShermanR. A., NaveC. S., & FunderD. C. (2010). Situational similarity and personality predict behavioral consistency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 330–343.
242.
ShermanR. A., RauthmannJ. F., BrownN. A., SerfassD. G., & JonesA. B. (2015). The independent effects of personality and situations on real–time expressions of behavior and emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109, 872–888.
243.
SpearmanC. (1961). C. Spearman. In MurchisonC. (Ed.), A history of psychology in autobiography (Vol. 1, pp. 299–333). New York: Russell and Russell (Original work published 1930).
244.
SpechtJ., BleidornW., DenissenJ. J. A., HenneckeM., HuttemanR., KandlerC., … ZimmermannJ. (2014). What drives adult personality development? A comparison of theoretical perspectives and empirical evidence. European Journal of Personality, 28, 216–230. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1966
245.
SpeerA., ChristiansenN. D., GoffinR. D., & GoffM. (2014). Situational bandwidth and the criterion–related validity of assessment center ratings: Is cross–exercise convergence always desirable?Journal of Applied Psychology, 100, 1–14.
246.
SpeerA., ChristiansenN. D., & HontsC. (2015). Assessment of personality through behavioral observations in work simulations. Personnel Assessment and Decisions, 1, 43–56.
247.
SuzukiT., SamuelD. B., PahlenS., & KruegerR. F. (2015). Dsm–5 alternative personality disorder model traits as maladaptive extreme variants of the five–factor model: An item–response theory analysis. Journal of abnormal psychology, 124, 343–354.
248.
SwannW. B., JohnsonR. E., & BossonJ. K. (2009). Identity negotiation at work. Research in Organizational Behavior, 29, 81–109.
249.
TackettJ. L., HerzhoffK., KushnerS. C., & RuleN. (2016). Thin slices of child personality: Perceptual, situational, and behavioral contributions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110, 150–166. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000044
250.
TackettJ. L., LangJ. W. B., MarkonK. E., & HerzhoffK. (under review). A correlated traits correlated methods model for thin–slice child personality assessment. Submitted for Publication.
251.
TaylorS. E. (2006). Tend and befriend: Biobehavioral bases of affiliation under stress. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15, 273–277. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467–8721.2006.00451.x
252.
TedeschiR. G., & CalhounL. G. (2004) Posttraumatic growth: Conceptual foundations and empirical evidence. Psychological Inquiry15, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli1501_01.
253.
TennenH., & AffleckG. (1998). Personality and transformation in the face of adversity. In TedeschiR. G., ParkC. & CalhounL. G. (Eds.), Posttraumatic growth: Positive changes in the aftermath of crisis (pp. 65–98). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
254.
TellegenA. (1981). Practicing the two disciplines for relaxation and enlightenment: Comment on “Role of the feedback signal in electromyograph biofeedback: The relevance of attention” by Qualls and Sheehan. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 110, 217–226.
255.
TellegenA. (1991). Personality traits: Issues of definition, evidence, and assessment. In CicchettiD. & GroveW. M. (Eds.), Thinking clearly about psychology: Essays in honor of Paul E. Meehl (pp. 10–35). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
256.
TettR. P., & BurnettD. D. (2003). A personality trait–based interactionist model of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 500–517.
257.
TettR. P., & ChristiansenN. D. (2007). Personality tests at the crossroads: A response to Morgeson, Campion, Dipboye Hollenbeck, Murphy, and Schmitt (2007). Personnel Psychology, 60, 967–993.
258.
TettR. P., & GutermanH. A. (2000). Situation trait relevance, trait expression, and cross–situational consistency: Testing a principle of trait activation. Journal of Research in Personality, 34, 397–423.
259.
TettR. P., JacksonD. N., RothsteinM., & ReddonJ. R. (1999). Meta–analysis of bi–directional relations in personality–job performance research, Human Performance, 12, 1–29.
260.
TettR. P., SimonetD. V., WalserB., & BrownC. (2013). Trait activation theory: Applications, developments, and implications for person–workplace fit. In ChristiansenN. D. & TettR. P. (eds.) Handbook of personality at work (pp. 71–100). New York: Routledge.
261.
TettR. P., HundleyN. A., & ChristiansenN. D. (2017). Meta–analysis and the myth of generalizability. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, in press.
262.
ThorntonG. C., RuppD. E., & HoffmanB. (2015). Assessment center perspectives for talent management strategies. New York: Routlege.
263.
ThorntonG. C., HansonR. M., & RuppD. E. (2017). Developing organizational simulations: A guide for practitioners, students, and researchers. New York, NY: Routledge.
264.
TropeY. (1986). Identification and inferential processes in dispositional attribution. Psychological Review, 93, 239–257.
265.
TupesE. C. (1957). Relationships between behavior trait ratings by peers and later office performance of USAF officer candidate school graduates. Lackland Air Force Base, Texas: Air Force Personnel and Training Research Center.
266.
TupesE. C., & ChristalR. C. (1958). Stability of personality trait rating factors obtained under diverse conditions USAF Wright Air Development Center Technical Note. Lackland Air Force Base: United States Air Force.
267.
Van IddekingeC. H., RaymarkP. H., & RothP. L. (2005). Assessing personality with a structured employment interview: Construct–related validity and susceptibility to response inflation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 536–552. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021–9010.90.3.536
268.
van ScheppingenM. A., JacksonJ. J., SpechtJ., HuttemanR., DenissenJ. J. A., & BleidornW. (2016). Personality development during the transition to parenthood: A test of social investment theory. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7, 452–462.
269.
van ScheppingenM. A., DenissenJ. J. A., ChungJ. M., TambsK., & BleidornW. (2017). Self Esteem and Relationship Satisfaction During the Transition to Motherhood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Preprint available at https://osf.io/xv4np/
270.
VazireS. (2010). Who knows what about a person? The self–other knowledge asymmetry (SOKA) model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 281–300.
271.
VazireS., & MehlM. R. (2008). Knowing me, knowing you: The accuracy and unique predictive validity of self–ratings and other–ratings of daily behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1202–1216.
272.
VerbekeL., & De ClercqB. (2017). The development of a situational judgement tool (SJT) for personality disorders. Contribution to symposium entitled: “'New insights and trends in the assessment of personality pathology” (Convener: Verbeke, L.) at the XVth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Personality Disorders (ISSPD), 2017, September 25–28, Heidelberg, Germany.
273.
WachtelP. (1973). Psychodynamics, behavior therapy, and the implacable experimenter: An inquiry into the consistency of personality. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 82, 324–334.
274.
WagermanS. A., & FunderD. C. (2009). Situations. In CorrP. J. & MatthewsG. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of personality psychology (pp. 27–42). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
275.
WaltonK. E., RobertsB. W., KruegerR. F., BlonigenD. M., & HicksB. M. (2008). Capturing abnormal personality with normal personality inventories: An item response theory approach. Journal of personality, 76, 1623–1648.
276.
WhitenerE. M. (1990). Confusion of confidence intervals and credibility intervals in meta–analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 315–321.
277.
WickerA. W. (1969). Attitudes versus actions: The relationship of verbal and overt behavioural responses to attitude objects. Journal of Social Issues, 25, 41–78.
278.
WilsonS., StroudC. B., & DurbinC. E. (2017). Interpersonal dysfunction in personality disorders: A meta–analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 143, 677–734.
279.
WoodD., GardnerM. H., & HarmsP. D. (2015). How functionalist and process approaches to behavior can explain trait covariation. Psychological Review, 122, 84–111.
280.
WoodD., LowmanG., HarmsP. D., & SpainS. M. (in press). Using functional fields to formally represent the meaning and logic of actions: A worked example using ‘dark’ actions.
281.
WoodD., SpainS. M., & HarmsP. D. (in press). Functional approaches to representing the interplay of situations, traits, and behavior. In FunderD. C., ShermanR. A., & RauthmannJ. F., Handbook of psychological situations. New York: Oxford.
282.
WrightS. (1934). The method of path coefficients. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 5, 161–215.
283.
WrightA. G. C. (2011). Quantitative and qualitative distinctions in personality disorder. Journal of Personality Assessment, 93, 370–379.
284.
WrightA. G. C., & HopwoodC. J. (2016). Advancing the assessment of dynamic psychological processes. Assessment, 23, 399–403.
285.
WrightA. G. C., & SimmsL. J. (2014). On the structure of personality disorder traits: Conjoint analyses of the CAT–PD, PID–5, and NEO–PI–3 trait models. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 5, 43–54.
286.
WrightA. G. C., & SimmsL. J. (2016). Stability and fluctuation of personality disorder features in daily life. Journal of Abnormal Psychology.125, 641–656.
287.
WrightA. G. C. & ZimmermannJ. (2015). At the nexus of science and practice: Answering basic clinical questions in personality disorder assessment and diagnosis with quantitative modeling techniques. In HuprichS. (Ed.), Personality disorders: Toward theoretical and empirical integration in diagnosis and assessment (pp. 109–144). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
288.
WrightA. G. C., ThomasK. M., HopwoodC. J., MarkonK. E., PincusA. L. & KruegerR. F. (2012). The hierarchical structure of DSM–5 pathological personality traits. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 121, 951–957.
289.
WrightA. G. C., SteppS. D., ScottL. N., HallquistM. N., BeeneyJ. E., LazarusS., & PilkonisP. A. (in press). The effect of pathological narcissism on interpersonal and affective processes in social interactions. Journal of Abnormal Psychology.
290.
YarkoniT., & WestfallJ. (in press). Choosing prediction over explanation in psychology: Lessons from machine learning. Perspectives on Psychological Science, in press.
291.
ZakiJ., BolgerN., & OchsnerK. (2008). It takes two: The interpersonal nature of empathic accuracy. Psychological Science, 19, 399–404.
292.
ZettlerI., LangJ. W. B., HülshegerU. R., & HilbigB. E. (2016). Dissociating indifferent, directional, and extreme responding in personality data: Applying the three–process model to self– and observer reports. Journal of Personality, 84, 461–472. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12172
293.
ZieglerM., & BrunnerM. (2016). Test standards and psychometric modeling. In LipnevichA. A., PreckelF., & RobertsR. (Eds.), Psychosocial skills and school systems in the 21st century (pp. 29–55). Göttingen: Springer.
294.
ZieglerM., & HorstmannK. (2015). Discovering the second side of the coin: Integrating situational perception into psychological assessment. European Journal of Personality Assessment, 31, 69–74.
295.
ZieglerM., MacCannC., & RobertsR. D. (2011). New perspectives on faking in personality assessments. New York: Oxford Press.
296.
ZimmermanR. D., del TrianaM. C., & BarrickM. R. (2010). Predictive criterion–related validity of observer ratings of personality and job–related competencies using multiple raters and multiple performance criteria. Human Performance, 23, 361–378.