AshtonM. C., & LeeK. (2007). Empirical, theoretical, and practical advantages of the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11, 150–166.
2.
AshtonM. C., & LeeK. (2009). The HEXACO–60: A short measure of the major dimensions of personality. Journal of Personality Assessment, 91, 340–345.
3.
AshtonM. C., LeeK., & de VriesR. E. (2014). The HEXACO honesty–humility, agreeableness, and emotionality factors: A review of research and theory. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 18(2), 139–152. doi:10.1177/1088868314523838
4.
BallietD., MulderL. B., & Van LangeP. A. M. (2011). Reward, punishment, and cooperation: A meta–analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 137(4), 594–615. doi:10.1037/a0023489
5.
BanduraA. (1991). Social cognitive theory of self–regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 248–287.
6.
BaumertA., HalmburgerA., & SchmittM. (2013). Interventions against norm violations: Dispositional determinants of self–reported and real moral courage. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39(8), 1053–1068. doi:10.1177/0146167213490032
7.
BaumertA., OttoK., ThomasN., BobocelD., & SchmittM. (2012). Processing of unjust and just information: Interpretation and memory performance related to dispositional victim sensitivity. European Journal of Personality, 26(2), 99–110. doi:10.1002/per.1844
8.
BaumertA., SchlösserT., & SchmittM. (2013). Economic games: A performance–based assessment of fairness and altruism. European Journal of Psychological Assessment. doi:10.1027/1015-5759/a000183
9.
BaumertA., & SchmittM. (2009). Justice–sensitive interpretations of ambiguous situations. Australian Journal of Psychology, 61(1), 6–12. doi:10.1080/00049530802607597
10.
BierhoffH.W. (2000). Skala der sozialen Verantwortung nach Berkowitz und Daniels: Entwicklung und Validierung [Social responsibility scale by Berkowitz and Daniels: Development and validation]. Diagnostica, 46(1), 18–28.
11.
Brosig–KochJ., HelbachC., OckenfelsA., & WeimannJ. (2011). Still different after all these years: Solidarity behavior in East and West Germany. Journal of Public Economics, 95(11–12), 1237–1660.
12.
BuchnerS., CoricelliG., & GreinerB. (2007). Self–centered and other–regarding behavior in the solidarity game. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 62(2), 293–303.
13.
de KwaadstenietE. W., van DijkE., WitA., & de CremerD. (2006). Social dilemmas as strong versus weak situations: Social value orientations and tacit coordination under resource size uncertainty. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42(4), 509–516. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2005.06.004
14.
DoosjeB., SpearsR., & EllemersN. (2002). Social identity as both cause and effect: The development of group identification in response to anticipated and actual changes in the intergroup status hierarchy. British Journal of Social Psychology, 41(1), 57.
15.
DruryJ., CockingC., & ReicherS. (2009). Everyone for themselves? A comparative study of crowd solidarity among emergency survivors. British Journal of Social Psychology, 48(3), 487–506. doi:10.1348/014466608x357893
16.
EllemersN., SpearsR., & DoosjeB. (1997). Sticking together or falling apart: In–group identification as a psychological determinant of group commitment versus individual mobility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(3), 617–626. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.72.3.617
17.
FetchenhauerD., & HuangX. (2004). Justice sensitivity and distributive decisions in experimental games. Personality and Individual Differences, 36(5), 1015–1029.
FischerL., BraunsD., & BelschakF. (2002). Zur Messung von Emotionen in der angewandten Forschung. Analysen mit den SAMs—Self–assessment Manikin. Lengerich: Pabst Science Publishers.
20.
FunderD. C. (2001). Personality. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 197–221. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.197
21.
GlasfordD. E., & CalcagnoJ. (2012). The conflict of harmony: Intergroup contact, commonality and political solidarity between minority groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(1), 323–328. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2011.10.001
22.
GollwitzerM., & RothmundT. (2011). What exactly are victim–sensitive persons sensitive to?Journal of Research in Personality, 45(5), 448–455. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2011.05.003
23.
GollwitzerM., RothmundT., & SüssenbachP. (2013). The sensitivity to mean intentions (SeMI) model: Basic assumptions, recent findings, and potential avenues for future research. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7(7), 415–426. doi:10.1111/spc3.12041
24.
GollwitzerM., SchmittM., SchalkeR., MaesJ., & BaerA. (2005). Asymmetrical effects of justice sensitivity perspectives on prosocial and antisocial behavior. Social Justice Research, 18(2), 183–201. doi:10.1007/s11211-005-7368-1
25.
HilbigB. E., & ZettlerI. (2009). Pillars of cooperation: Honesty–humility, social value orientations, and economic behavior. Journal of Research in Personality, 43(3), 516–519. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2009.01.003
26.
HilbigB. E., ZettlerI., & HeydaschT. (2012). Personality, punishment and public goods: Strategic shifts towards cooperation as a matter of dispositional honesty–humility. European Journal of Personality, 26(3), 245–254. doi:10.1002/per.830
27.
HilbigB. E., ZettlerI., LeistF., & HeydaschT. (2013). It takes two: Honesty–humility and agreeableness differentially predict active versus reactive cooperation. Personality and Individual Differences, 54(5), 598–603. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2012.11.008
28.
HilbigB. E., ZettlerI., MoshagenM., & HeydaschT. (2013). Tracing the path from personality—via cooperativeness—to conservation. European Journal of Personality, 27(4), 319–327. doi:10.1002/per.1856
29.
HirshJ. B., & PetersonJ. B. (2009). Extraversion, neuroticism, and the prisoner's dilemma. Personality and Individual Differences, 46(2), 254–256. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2008.10.006
30.
JonesD. N., & FigueredoA. J. (2013). The core of darkness: Uncovering the heart of the Dark Triad. European Journal of Personality, 27(6), 521–531. doi:10.1002/per.1893
31.
KurzbanR., & HouserD. (2001). Individual differences in cooperation in a circular public goods game. European Journal of Personality, 15(S1), S37–S52. doi:10.1002/per.420
32.
LangP. J. (1980). Behavioral treatment and bio–behavioral assessment: computer applications. In SidowskiJ. B., JohnsonJ. H. & WilliamsT. A. (Eds.), Technology in mental health care delivery systems (pp. 119–137). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
33.
LangerE. J. (1975). The illusion of control. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 32(2), 311–328.
34.
Le RoyJ., BastounisM., & Minibas–PoussardJ. (2012). Interactional justice and counterproductive work behaviors: The mediating role of negative emotions. Social Behavior & Personality: an International Journal, 40(8), 1341–1355.
35.
LeeK., AshtonM. C., WiltshireJ., BourdageJ. S., VisserB. A., & GallucciA. (2013). Sex, power, and money: Prediction from the Dark Triad and honesty–humility. European Journal of Personality, 27(2), 169–184. doi:10.1002/per.1860
36.
LotzS., BaumertA., SchlösserT., GresserF., & FetchenhauerD. (2011). Individual differences in third–party interventions: How justice sensitivity shapes altruistic punishment. Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 4(4), 297–313. doi:10.1111/j.1750-4716.2011.00084.x
37.
LotzS., SchlösserT., CainD. M., & FetchenhauerD. (2013). The (in)stability of social preferences: Using justice sensitivity to predict when altruism collapses. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 93, 141–148. doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2013.07.012
38.
LucasR. E., & DonnellanM. B. (2009). If the person–situation debate is really over, why does it still generate so much negative affect?Journal of Research in Personality, 43(2), 146–149. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2009.02.009
39.
MurphyK., & TylerT. (2008). Procedural justice and compliance behaviour: The mediating role of emotions. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38(4), 652–668. doi:10.1002/ejsp.502
40.
PeruginiM., & De RaadB. (2001). Editorial: Personality and economic behaviour. European Journal of Personality, 15(S1), S1–S4. doi:10.1002/per.427
41.
PreacherK. J., & HayesA. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891.
42.
RothmundT., BaumertA., & ZinkernagelA. (2014). The German ‘Wutbürger’: How justice sensitivity accounts for individual differences in political engagement. Social Justice Research, 27(1), 24–44. doi:10.1007/s11211-014-0202-x
43.
RustingC. L. (1998). Personality, mood, and cognitive processing of emotional information: Three conceptual frameworks. Psychological Bulletin, 124(2), 165–196. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.124.2.165
44.
SchlösserT., DunningD., & FetchenhauerD. (2013). What a feeling: The role of immediate and anticipated emotions in risky decisions. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 26, 13–30.
45.
SchlösserT., LotzS., & FetchenhauerD. (2010). Who gives and who takes? The effect of justice sensitivity in public good games. Paper presented at the 13th Biennial Conference of ISJR, Banff, Canada.
SchmittM., BaumertA., GollwitzerM., & MaesJ. (2010). The justice sensitivity inventory: Factorial validity, location in the personality facet space, demographic pattern, and normative data. Social Justice Research, 23(2–3), 211–238. doi:10.1007/s11211-010-0115-2
48.
SchmittM., GollwitzerM., MaesJ., & ArbachD. (2005). Justice sensitivity: Assessment and location in the personality space. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 21(3), 202–211. doi:10.1027/1015-5759.21.3.202
49.
SchmittM., & SabbaghC. (2004). Synergistic person × situation interaction in distributive justice judgment and allocation behaviour. Personality and Individual Differences, 37(2), 359–371. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2003.09.009
50.
SeltenR., & OckenfelsA. (1998). An experimental solidarity game. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 34(4), 517–539. doi:10.1016/s0167-2681(97)00107-8
51.
StavrovaO., SchlösserT., & BaumertA. (2014). Life satisfaction and job–seeking behavior of the unemployed: The effect of individual differences in justice sensitivity. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 64(3), 643–670. doi:10.1111/apps.12009
52.
SubašićE., ReynoldsK. J., & TurnerJ. C. (2008). The political solidarity model of social change: Dynamics of self–categorization in intergroup power relations. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12(4), 330–352. doi:10.1177/1088868308323223
53.
SubašićE., SchmittM. T., & ReynoldsK. J. (2011). Are we all in this together? Co–victimization, inclusive social identity and collective action in solidarity with the disadvantaged. British Journal of Social Psychology, 50(4), 707–725. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02073.x
54.
TrhalN., & RadermacherR. (2009). Bad luck vs. self–inflicted neediness—An experimental investigation of gift giving in a solidarity game. Journal of Economic Psychology, 30(4), 517–526. doi:10.1016/j.joep.2009.03.004
55.
Van LangeP. A. M. (1999). The pursuit of joint outcomes and equality in outcomes: An integrative model of social value orientation. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 77(2), 337–349.
56.
VanYperenN. W., HagedoornM., ZweersM., & PostmaS. (2000). Injustice and employees’ destructive responses: The mediating role of state negative affect. Social Justice Research, 13(3), 291–312. doi:10.1023/a:1026411523466
57.
ZhangY., & FishbachA. (2005). The role of anticipated emotions in the endowment effect. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 15(4), 316–324. doi:10.1207/s15327663jcp1504_6
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
