Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

In this paper, we investigate personality expression and impression formation processes in online social networks (OSNs). We explore whether, when and why people accurately judge others’ personalities (accuracy), successfully manage the impressions that others form of them (impression management) and accurately infer others’ impressions of them (meta–accuracy) at zero acquaintance. On the basis of targets’ OSN profiles (N = 103), overall perceiver impressions were collected and compared with targets’ self–view, desired impression and meta–perception. In addition, independent groups of thin–slice perceivers based their personality impressions solely on one of four kinds of information within the OSN profiles (profile picture, interests field, group list and notice board), and more than 300 OSN cues (e.g. attractive person and number of friends) were coded. Results showed evidence of accuracy, impression management and meta–accuracy, but their extent was moderated by the trait (e.g. Big Five and self–esteem), the kind of information and the interplay of trait and information. Findings could be explained by cue expression and cue utilization processes (lens model analyses). Future prospects for studying personality impressions in online and offline environments are discussed. Copyright © 2013 European Association of Personality Psychology.

Keywords

online social networks personality interpersonal perception zero acquaintance lens model

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Albright

, Kenny

D. A.

, & Malloy

T. E.

(1988). Consensus in personality judgments at zero acquaintance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 387–395.

Ambady

, Bernieri

F. J.

, & Richeson

J. A.

(2000). Toward a histology of social behavior: Judgmental accuracy from thin slices of the behavioral stream. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 32, 201–271.

Ambady

, & Rosenthal

(1992). Thin slices of expressive behavior as predictors of interpersonal consequences: A meta–analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 256–274.

Asendorpf

J. B.

, & van Aken

M. A. G.

(2003). Personality–relationship transaction in adolescence: Core versus surface personality characteristics. Journal of Personality, 71, 629–666.

Back

M. D.

, Baumert

, Denissen

J. J. A.

, Hartung

F. M.

, Penke

, Schmukle

S. C.

, Wrzus

(2011). PERSOC: A unified framework for understanding the dynamic interplay of personality and social relationships. European Journal of Personality, 25, 90–107.

Back

M. D.

, & Kenny

D. A.

(2010). The Social Relations Model: How to understand dyadic processes. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4, 855–870.

Back

M. D.

, Penke

, Schmukle

S. C.

, & Asendorpf

J. B.

(2011). Knowing your own mate value: Sex–specific personality effects on the accuracy of expected mate choices. Psychological Science, 22, 984–989.

Back

M. D.

, Penke

, Schmukle

S. C.

, Sachse

, Borkenau

, & Asendorpf

J. B.

(2011). Why mate choices are not as reciprocal as we assume: The role of personality, flirting, and physical attractiveness. European Journal of Personality, 25, 120–132.

Back

M. D.

, Schmukle

S. C.

, & Egloff

(2008). How extraverted is honey.bunny77@hotmail.de? Inferring personality from e–mail addresses. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 1116–1122.

10.

Back

M. D.

, Schmukle

S. C.

, & Egloff

(2009). Predicting actual behavior from the explicit and implicit self–concept of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 533–548.

11.

Back

M. D.

, Schmukle

S. C.

, & Egloff

(2010). Why are narcissists so charming at first sight? Decoding the narcissismpopularity link at zero acquaintance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 132–145.

12.

Back

M. D.

, Schmukle

S. C.

, & Egloff

(2011). A closer look at first sight: Social relations lens model analyses of personality and interpersonal attraction at zero acquaintance. European Journal of Personality, 25, 225–238.

13.

Back

M. D.

, Stopfer

J. M.

, Vazire

, Gaddis

, Schmukle

S. C.

, Egloff

, & Gosling

S. D.

(2010). Facebook profiles reflect actual personality, not self–idealization. Psychological Science, 21, 372–374.

14.

Bem

D. J.

(1967). Self–perception: An alternative interpretation of cognitive dissonance phenomena. Psychological Review, 74, 183–200.

15.

Bem

D. J.

(1972). Self–perception theory. In Berkowitz

(Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 6, pp. 1–62). New York, NY: Academic Press.

16.

Biesanz

J. C.

(2010). The social accuracy model of interpersonal perception: Assessing individual differences in perceptive and expressive accuracy. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 45, 853–885.

17.

Biesanz

J. C.

, West

S. G.

, & Millevoi

(2007). What do you learn about someone over time? The relationship between length of acquaintance and consensus and self–other agreement in judgments of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 119–135.

18.

Bollich

K. L.

, Johannet

P. M.

, & Vazire

(2011). In search of our true selves: Feedback as a path to self–knowledge. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 312.

19.

Borkenau

, & Liebler

(1992). Trait inferences: Sources of validity at zero acquaintance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 645–657.

20.

Borkenau

, Mauer

, Riemann

, Spinath

F. M.

, & Angleitner

(2004). Thin slices of behavior as cues of personality and intelligence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 599–614.

21.

boyd

D. M.

, & Ellison

N. B.

(2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer–Mediated Communication, 13, 210–230.

22.

Brunswik

(1956). Perception and the representative design of experiments. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

23.

Buffardi

L. E.

, & Campbell

W. K.

(2008). Narcissism and social networking web sites. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1303–1314.

24.

Carlson

E. N.

, & Furr

R. M.

(2009). Evidence of differential meta–accuracy: People understand the different impressions they make. Psychological Science, 20, 1033–1039.

25.

Carlson

E. N.

, & Kenny

D. A.

(2012). Do we know how others see us? In Vazire

, & Wilson

T. D.

(Eds.), Handbook of self–knowledge (pp. 212–257). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

26.

Carlson

E. N.

, Vazire

, & Furr

R. M.

(2011). Meta–Insight: Do people really know how others see them? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 831–846.

27.

Christofides

, Muise

, & Desmarais

(2009). Information disclosure and control on Facebook: Are they two sides of the same coin or two different processes? Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 12, 341–345.

28.

comScore (2011). It's a social world: Top 10 need–to–knows about social networking and where it's headed. Retrieved June 14, 2012, from http://www.comscore.com/Press_Events/Presentations_Whitepapers/2011/it_is_a_social_world_top_10_need–to–knows_about_social_networking.

29.

Connelly

B. S.

, & Ones

D. S.

(2010). An other perspective on personality: Meta–analytic integration of observers’ accuracy and predictive validity. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 1092–1122.

30.

Cooksey

R. W.

(1996). Judgment analysis: Theory, methods, and applications. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

31.

DePaulo

B. M.

, Kenny

D. A.

, Hoover

, Webb

, & Oliver

P. V.

(1987). Accuracy of person perception: Do people know what kind of impressions they convey? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 303–315.

32.

DePaulo

B. M.

, Lanier

, & Davis

(1983). Detecting the deceit of the motivated liar. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 1096–1103.

33.

Efron

, & Tibshirani

R. J.

(1993). An introduction to the bootstrap. New York, NY: Chapman & Hall/CRC.

34.

Facebook (2013). Newsroom. Retrieved May 6, 2013, from http://newsroom.fb.com/Key–Facts.

35.

Fleming

J. S.

, & Courtney

B. E.

(1984). The dimensionality of self–esteem: II. Hierarchical facet model for revised measurement scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 404–421.

36.

Funder

D. C.

(2012). Accurate personality judgment. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21, 177–182.

37.

Funder

D. C.

, & Colvin

C. R.

(1997). Congruence of self and others’ judgments of personality. In Hogan

, Johnston

, & Briggs

(Eds.), Handbook of personality psychology (pp. 617–647). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

38.

Funder

D. C.

, & Dobroth

K. M.

(1987). Differences between traits: Properties associated with interjudge agreement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 409–418.

39.

Funder

D. C.

, Furr

R. M.

, & Colvin

C. R.

(2000). The Riverside Behavioral Q–sort: A tool for the description of social behavior. Journal of Personality, 68, 451–489.

40.

Funder

D. C.

, & Sneed

C. D.

(1993). Behavioral manifestations of personality: An ecological approach to judgmental accuracy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 479–490.

41.

Furr

M. R.

(2008). A framework for profile similarity: Integrating similarity, normativeness, and distinctiveness. Journal of Personality, 76, 1267–1316.

42.

Goffman

(1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday/Anchor Books.

43.

Gosling

S. D.

(2008). Snoop: What your stuff says about you. New York, NY: Basic Books.

44.

Gosling

S. D.

, Augustine

A. A.

, Vazire

, Holtzman

, & Gaddis

(2011). Manifestations of personality in online social networks: Self–reported Facebook–related behaviors and observable profile information. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 14, 483–488.

45.

Gosling

S. D.

, Ko

S. J.

, Mannarelli

, & Morris

M. E.

(2002). A room with a cue: Personality judgments based on offices and bedrooms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 379–398.

46.

Graham

L. T.

, & Gosling

S. D.

(2012). Impressions of World of Warcraft players’ personalities based on their usernames: Interobserver consensus but no accuracy. Journal of Research in Personality, 46, 599–603.

47.

Hammond

K. R.

, Stewart

T. R.

, Brehmer

, Steinmann

D. O.

(1975). Social judgment theory. In Kaplan

& Schwartz

(Eds.), Human judgment and decision processes (pp. 271–312). New York, NY: Academic Press.

48.

Hayes

A. F.

(2009). Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Communication Monographs, 76, 408–420.

49.

Hirschmüller

, Egloff

, Nestler

, & Back

M. D.

(2013). The dual lens model: A comprehensive framework for understanding self–other agreement of personality judgments at zero acquaintance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 335–353.

50.

Hoffman

P. J.

(1960). The paramorphic representation of clinical judgment. Psychological Bulletin, 57, 116–131.

51.

Holland

J. L.

(1973). Making vocational choices: A theory of careers. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice–Hall.

52.

Holleran

S. E.

, & Mehl

M. R.

(2008). Let me read your mind: Personality judgments based on a person's natural stream of thought. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 747–754.

53.

Human

L. J.

, Biesanz

J. C.

, Parisotto

K. L.

, & Dunn

E. W.

(2012). Your best self helps reveal your true self: Positive self–presentation leads to more accurate personality impressions. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3, 23–30.

54.

Ivcevic

, & Ambady

(2013). Face to (Face)book: The two faces of social behavior? Journal of Personality, 81, 290–301.

55.

John

O. P.

, Donahue

E. M.

, & Kentle

(1991). The Big Five Inventory—Versions 4a and 54 (Technical Report). Berkeley: Institute of Personality and Social Research, University of California.

56.

John

O. P.

, & Robins

R. W.

(1993). Determinants of interjudge agreement on personality traits: The Big Five domains, observability, evaluativeness, and the unique perspective of the self. Journal of Personality, 61, 521–551.

57.

Jones

E. E.

, Gergen

K. J.

, & Davis

K. E.

(1962). Some determinants of reactions to being approved or disapproved as a person. Psychological Monograph: General and Applied, 76, Whole No. 521.

58.

Kenny

D. A.

(1994). Interpersonal perception: A social relations analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

59.

Kenny

D. A.

, Albright

, Malloy

T. E.

, & Kashy

D. A.

(1994). Consensus in interpersonal perception: Acquaintance and the Big Five. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 245–258.

60.

Kenny

D. A.

, & DePaulo

B. M.

(1993). Do people know how others view them? An empirical and theoretical account. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 145–161.

61.

Kenny

D. A.

, Kashy

D. A.

, & Bolger

(1998). Data analysis in social psychology. In Gilbert

, Fiske

& Lindzey

(Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 233–265). Boston, MA: McGraw–Hill.

62.

Krämer

N. C.

, & Winter

(2008). Impression Management 2.0. The relationship of self–esteem, extraversion, self–efficacy and self–presentation within social networking sites. Journal of Media Psychology, 20, 106–116.

63.

Küfner

A. C. P.

, Back

M. D.

, Nestler

, & Egloff

(2010). Tell me a story and I will tell you who you are! Lens model analyses of personality and creative writing. Journal of Research in Personality, 44, 427–435.

64.

Laing

R. D.

, Phillipson

, & Lee

A. R.

(1966). Interpersonal perception: A theory and a method of research. New York, NY: Springer.

65.

Leary

M. R.

(1995). Self–presentation: Impression management and interpersonal behavior. Madison, WI: Brown & Benchmark.

66.

Leary

M. R.

, & Kowalski

R. M.

(1990). Impression management: A literature review and two–component model. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 34–47.

67.

Leising

, & Borkenau

(2011). Person perception, dispositional inferences, and social judgment. In Horowitz

L. M.

& Strack

(Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal psychology: Theory, research, assessment, and therapeutic interventions (pp. 157–170). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

68.

Levesque

M. J.

, & Kenny

D. A.

(1993). Accuracy of behavioral predictions at zero acquaintance: A social relations analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 1178–1187.

69.

Lewis

, Kaufman

, Gonzalez

, Wimmer

, & Christakis

(2008). Tastes, ties, and time: A new social network dataset using Facebook.com. Social Networks, 30, 330–342.

70.

Mackinnon

D. P.

, Lockwood

C. M.

, & Williams

(2004). Confidence limits for the indirect effect: Distribution of the product and resampling methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 99–128.

71.

McAdams

D. P.

(1995). What do we know when we know a person. Journal of Personality, 63, 365–396.

72.

Mehdizadeh

(2010). Self–presentation 2.0: Narcissism and self–esteem on Facebook. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 13, 357–364.

73.

Murphy

N. A.

(2007). Appearing smart: The impression management of intelligence, person perception accuracy, and behavior in social interaction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 325–339.

74.

Muthén

L. K.

, & Muthén

B. O.

(2010). Mplus user's guide (6th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.

75.

Naumann

L. P.

, Vazire

, Rentfrow

P. J.

, & Gosling

S. D.

(2009). Personality judgments based on physical appearance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 1661–1671.

76.

Nestler

, Egloff

, Küfner

A. C. P.

, & Back

M. D.

(2012). An integrative lens model approach to bias and accuracy in human inferences: Hindsight effects and knowledge updating in personality judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 698–717.

77.

Orne

M. T.

(1962). On the social psychology of the psychological experiment: With particular reference to demand characteristics and their implications. American Psychologist, 17, 776–783.

78.

Paulhus

D. L.

(1984). Two–component models of socially desirable responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 598–609.

79.

Paulhus

D. L.

, & John

O. P.

(1998). Egoistic and moralistic biases in self–perception: The interplay of self–deceptive styles with basic traits and motives. Journal of Personality, 66, 1025–1060.

80.

Peluchette

, & Karl

(2010). Examining students’ intended image on Facebook: “What were they thinking?!” The Journal of Education for Business, 85, 30–37.

81.

Pennebaker

J. W.

, Booth

R. J.

, & Francis

M. E.

(2007). Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count: LIWC 2007. Austin, TX: LIWC.

82.

Pennebaker

J. W.

, Francis

M. E.

, & Booth

R. J.

(2001). Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count: LIWC 2001. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

83.

Preacher

K. J.

, & Hayes

A. F.

(2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891.

84.

Rammstedt

, & John

O. P.

(2007). Measuring personality in one minute or less: A 10–item short version of the Big Five Inventory in English and German. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 203–212.

85.

Rentfrow

P. J.

, & Gosling

S. D.

(2003). The do re mi's of everyday life: The structure and personality correlates of music preferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 1236–1256.

86.

Rentfrow

P. J.

, & Gosling

S. D.

(2006). Message in a ballad: The role of music preferences in interpersonal perception. Psychological Science, 17, 236–242.

87.

Ross

, Orr

E. S.

, Sisic

, Arseneault

J. M.

, Simmering

M. G.

, & Orr

R. R.

(2009). Personality and motivations associated with Facebook use. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 578–586.

88.

Santor

D. A.

, Messervey

, & Kusumakar

(2000). Measuring peer pressure, popularity, and conformity in adolescent boys and girls: Predicting school performance, sexual attitudes, and substance abuse. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 29, 163–182.

89.

Schlenker

B. R.

(1980). Impression management: The self–concept, social identity, and interpersonal relations. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.

90.

Schütz

, & Sellin

(2006). Die multidimensionale Selbstwertskala (MSWS) [The multidimensional self–esteem scale]. Göttingen: Hogrefe.

91.

Sherman

R. C.

, End

, Kraan

, Cole

, Campbell

, Klausner

, & Birchmeier

(2001). Metaperception in cyberspace. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 4, 123–129.

92.

Shrout

P. E.

, & Fleiss

J. L.

(1979). Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 420–428.

93.

Stangl

(1991). Der Freizeit–Interessen–Test (FIT) [Leisure interests test]. Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 4, 231–244.

94.

Stecher

K. B.

, & Counts

(2008). Thin slices of online profile attributes. Proceedings of the International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (pp. 1–9). Seattle, WA: Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence.

95.

Steele

Jr. , Evans

D. C.

, & Green

R. K.

(2009). Is your profile picture worth 1000 words? Photo characteristics associated with personality impression agreement. Proceedings of the International Conference on Webblogs and Social Media (pp. 327–330). Seattle, WA: Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence.

96.

Stopfer

J. M

, Egloff

, Nestler

, & Back

M. D.

(2013). Being popular in online social networks: How agentic, communal, and creativity traits relate to judgments of status and liking. Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 592–598.

97.

Swann

W. B.

Jr. (1983). Self–verification: Bringing social reality into harmony with the self. In Suls

& Greenwald

A. G.

(Eds.), Social psychological perspectives on the self (Vol. 2, pp. 33–66). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

98.

Swann

W. B.

Jr. (1984). Quest for accuracy in person perception: A matter of pragmatics. Psychological Review, 91, 457–477.

99.

Swann

W. B.

Jr. , & Bosson

J. K.

(2008). Identity negotiation: A theory of self and social interaction. In John

O. P.

, Robins

R. W.

& Pervin

L. A.

(Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 448–471). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

100.

Tong

S. T.

, Van Der Heide

, Langwell

, & Walther

J. B.

(2008). Too much of a good thing? The relationship between number of friends and interpersonal impressions on Facebook. Journal of Computer–Mediated Communication, 13, 531–549.

101.

Valkenburg

P. M.

, & Peter

(2009). Social consequences of the internet for adolescents: A decade of research. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 1–5.

102.

Vazire

, & Gosling

S. D.

(2004). E–perceptions: Personality impressions based on personal websites. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 123–132.

103.

Waggoner

A. S.

, Smith

E. R.

, & Collins

E. C.

(2009). Person perception by active versus passive perceivers. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 1028–1031.

104.

Watson

(1989). Strangers’ ratings of the five robust personality factors: Evidence of a surprising convergence with self–report. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 120–128.

105.

Watts

D. J.

(2007). A twenty–first century science. Nature, 445, 489.

106.

Weisbuch

, Ivcevic

, & Ambady

(2009). On being liked on the web and in the “real world”: Consistency in first impressions across personal webpages and spontaneous behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 573–576.

107.

Wilcox

R. R.

(1990). Comparing the variances of two dependent groups. Journal of Educational Statistics, 15, 237–247.

108.

Wilson

R. E.

, Gosling

S. D.

, & Graham

L. T.

(2012). A review of Facebook research in the social sciences. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 203–220.

109.

Zywica

, & Danowski

(2008). The faces of Facebookers: Investigating social enhancement and social compensation hypotheses; predicting Facebook and offline popularity from sociability and self–esteem, and mapping the meanings of popularity with semantic networks. Journal of Computer–Mediated Communication, 14, 1–34.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.08 MB

Personality Expression and Impression Formation in Online Social Networks: An Integrative Approach to Understanding the Processes of Accuracy,Impression Management and Meta–Accuracy

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material