The design and uses of an employability index to evaluate the vertical workforce development process

Barghaus K.M. , Bradlow E.T. , McMaken J. & Rikoon S.H. (2012). Assessing and measuring workforce readiness: A discussion toward the development of a universal and valid measure. In Perna L.W. (Ed.), Preparing today's students for tomorrow's jobs in metropolitan America (pp.37–56). Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.

Blanchard O. (2017). Designing labor market institutions. In Slay B. (Ed.), Beyond transition: Development perspectives and dilemmas, (pp.129–137). New York, NY: Routledge.

Bond G.R. , Becker D.R. , Drake R.E. & Vogler K.M. (1997). A fidelity scale for the individual placement and support model of supported employment. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 40, 265–284.

Brown P. , Hesketh A. & Williams S. (2004). The mismanagement of talent: Employability and jobs in the knowledge economy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Camara W. (2013). Defining and measuring college and career readiness: A validation framework. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 32(4), 16–27.

Casner–Lott J. , Rosenblum E. & Wright M. (2009). The ill–prepared U.S. workforce: Exploring the challenges of employer–provided workforce readiness training. New York, NY: Conference Board.

Clark H. (2013). Work readiness standards and benchmarks: The key to differentiating America's workforce and regaining competitiveness. Iowa City, IA: ACT, Inc.

Forrier A. & Sels L. (2003): The concept of employability: A complex mosaic. International Journal of Human Resources Development and Management, 3(2), 102–124.

Fugate M. , Kinicki A.J. & Ashforth B.E. (2004). Employability: A psycho–social construct, its dimensions and applications. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 65(1), 14–38.

Greenberg M & Noyes JL (2004). The opportunities for service integration under current law. Focus 23(2), 30–34.

Harvey L. (2001). Defining and measuring employability. Quality in Higher Education, 7(2), 97–109.

Henly J.R. (2000). Mismatch in the low–wage labor market: Job search perspective. In Kaye K. & Nightingale D.S. (Eds.), The low–wage labor market: Challenges and opportunities for economic self–sufficiency, (pp.145–167). Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Secretary, Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation.

Heritage Foundation (2015). The Budget Book: 106 Ways to Reduce the Size and Scope of Government. Retrieved from http://budget–book2015.s3.amazonaws.com/PDFs/BudgetBook_Final_WEB.pdf, accessed August 30, 2018.

Hillage J. & Pollard E. (1998). Employability: Developing a framework for policy analysis. Issue Brief #85. London, England: UK Department of Education and Employment.

Holland B. (2015). A workforce development systems model for unemployed job seekers. Journal of Adult and Continuing Education, 21(2), 55–76.

Holland B. (2016). Both sides now: Toward the dual customer approach under the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act in the United States. Local Economy, 31(2), 424–441.

Holland B. (2018). Defining and Measuring Workforce Development in a Post–Bipartisan Era. (GLO Discussion Paper No 234). Retrieved from Global Labor Organization website: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/180827/1/GLO–DP–0234.pdf, accessed August 30, 2018.

Hong P.Y.P. (2013). Toward a client–centered benchmark for self–sufficiency: Evaluating the “process” of becoming job ready. Journal of Community Practice, 21(4), 356–378.

Hong P.Y.P. , Choi S. , & Key W. (2018). Psychological self–sufficiency: A bottom–uptheory of change in workforce development. Social Work Research, 42(1), 22–32.

Iversen R.R. & Armstrong A.L. (2006) Jobs aren't enough: Toward a new economic mobility for low–income families. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.

Jacobs R.L. & Hawley J.D. (2009). The emergence of ‘workforce development’: Definition, conceptual boundaries and implications. In MacLean R. & Wilson D. (Eds.), International Handbook of Education for the Changing World of Work, (pp. 2537–2552). Dordecht, Netherlands & New York, NY: Springer.

Johnson R.C. & Corcoran M.E. (2003). The road to economic self–sufficiency: Job quality and job transition patterns after welfare reform. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 22(4), 615–639.

MacLeod J. (2018). Ain't no makin’ it: Aspirations and attainment in a low–income neighborhood. New York, NY: Routledge.

McArdle S. , Waters L. , Briscoe J.P. & Hall D.T.T. (2007). Employability during unemployment: Adaptability, career identity and human and social capital. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 71(2), 247–264.

Naemi B. , Burrus J. , Kyllonen P.C. & Roberts R.D. (2012). Building a case to develop noncognitive assessment products and services targeting workforce readiness at ETS. Research Memorandum RM–12–23. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service (ETS).

O'Neil H.F. Jr. & O'Neil H.F. (2014). Workforce readiness: Competencies and assessment. New York, NY: Psychology Press.

Rothwell A. and Arnold J. (2007). Self–perceived employability: Development and validation of a scale: Personnel Review, 36(1), 23–41.

U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (2018a). Labor Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey: Unemployment Rate [Data file.] Retrieved from https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS14000000, accessed August 30, 2018.

U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (2018b). Labor Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey: Labor Force Participation Rate [Data file.] Retrieved from https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS11300000, accessed August 30, 2018.

US General Accountability Office (2009). Workforce Investment Act: Labor has made progress in addressing areas of concern, but more focus needed on understanding what works and what doesn't, Testimony of George A. Scott, Director, Education, Workforce and Income Security to U.S. House Committee on Education and Labor, Subcommittee on Higher Education, Lifelong Learning and Competitiveness. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, GAO–09–396T.

U.S. General Accountability Office (2011). Multiple Employment and Training Programs: Providing Information on Collocating Services and Consolidating Administrative Structures Could Promote Efficiencies. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, GAO–11–92.