Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This article was written in response to the editor's invitation to provide an alternative perspective to Zarestky and Cole's article in this same issue. While appreciating the perspective provided, I question the assumption that SOAR (strengths, opportunities, aspirations, results) as an approach to strategic planning will strengthen organization development. From among many concerns that I have with this approach, I offer four with brief explanations: the lack of systems thinking associated with positive psychology, the lack of efficacy associated with traditional strategic planning, the failure of a results orientation in a field that applauds continuous improvement, and the inability to identify the necessary data to support either SWOT (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, threats) or SOAR.

Keywords

SOAR SWOT Appreciative Inquiry Strategic Planning Continuous Improvement Process Improvement Organization Development

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Chermack

T. J.

(2011). Scenario planning in organizations: How to create, use, and assess scenarios. San Francisco, CA: Berrett–Koehler.

Cooperrider

D. L.

& Whitney

(1999). Collaborating for change: Appreciative inquiry. San Francisco, CA: Berrett–Koehlere Communications.

Egan

T. M.

, & Lancaster

C. M.

(2005). Comparing appreciative inquiry and action research: OD practitioner perspectives. Organization Development Journal, 23(2), 29–49.

Kohn

(1999). Punished by rewards: The trouble with gold stars, incentive plans, As, praise, and other bribes (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Mariner Books.

McLean

G. N.

(2005). Examining approaches to HR evaluation: The strengths and weaknesses of popular measurement methods. Strategic HR Review, 4(2), 24–27. doi: 10.1108/14754390580000591

McLean

G. N.

(2000). “It depends.” Advances in Developing Human Resources, (7), 39–43. doi: 10.1177/152342230000200305

McLean

G. N.

(2006). Organization development: Principles, processes, performance. San Francisco, CA: Berrett–Koehler.

Rieber

A. J.

(2004). The crack in the plaster: Crisis in Romania and the origins of the cold war. The Journal of Modern History, 76(1), 62–106. doi: 10.1086/421185

Senge

P. M.

(1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Doubleday/Currency.

10.

Swanson

R. A.

, & Holton

E. F.

(2009). Foundations of human resource development. San Francisco, CA: Berrett–Koehler Publishers, Inc.

11.

Zarestky

, & Cole

C. S.

(2017). Strengths, opportunities, aspirations, and results: An emerging approach to organization development. New Horizons in Adult Education & Human Resource Development, 29(1), xx–xx.

Reaction — will SOAR Really Help Organization Development Soar? (An Invited Reaction to Zarestky and Cole,2017)

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References