A debate that has engaged the attention of educators and scores of intellectuals is the longstanding issue of pedagogy versus andragogy. The nature of the debate, given the interdisciplinary theoretical assumptions that underpin the issue, has had a polarizing effect on these scholars; as a result, there has been the emergence of competing theories. This paper addresses the salient issues in the longstanding debate concerning the merits and demerits of pedagogy and andragogy and posits a new model, pedandragogy, which is a synthesis of the core elements of pedagogy and andragogy. Pedandragogy is a model that promotes and encourages the development of effective learning environments where self–engaged learning by individuals of all ages can be fostered.
BoudD., CohenR. & WalkerD. (Eds.). (1993). Using experience for learning. Buckingham, UK: SHRE and Open University Press.
2.
BrillJ.M. & ParkY. (2008). Facilitating engaged learning in the interaction age: Taking a pedagogically–disciplined approach to innovation with emergent technologies. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 20 (1), 70–78.
3.
BritonD. (1996). The modern practice of adult education: A Postmodern critique. Albany: SUNY Press.
4.
BrookfieldD. S. (1991). Understanding and facilitating adult learning: A comprehensive analysis of principles and effective practices. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
5.
BulgerM. E., MayerR. E., AlmerothK.C., & BlauS.D. (2008). Measuring learner engagement in computer–equipped college classrooms, Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 17(2), 129–143.
6.
ChallisM. (1996). Andragogy and the accreditation of prior learning: points on a continuum or uneasy bedfellows?London: Routledge.
CronbachL.J. (1968). Psychological issues and recent curricular reforms. In KuhlenR.G. (Ed.) Studies in educational psychology (19–26). Waltham, MA: Blaisdell Publishing Co.
11.
DavenportJ.& DavenportJ.A. (1985). A chronology and analysis of the andragogy debate. Adult Educational Quarterly, 35(3), 152–159.
12.
DavenportJ., 111. (1987, March). A way out of the andragogy morass. Paper presented at the conference of the Georgia Adult EducationAssociation: Savannah, GA.
HungD., TanS.C., & KohT.S. (2006). Engaged learning: Making learning an authentic experience. In Brill & Park (2008). Facilitating engaged learning in the interaction age: Taking a pedagogically–disciplined approach to innovation with emergent technologies. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education.20(1) 70–78.
19.
HewittJ. & BrettC. (2005). The relationship between class size and online activity patterns in asynchronous computer conferencing environments. Computers in Education, 49 (2007), 13.
JoyceB. &WeilM. (2008). Models of teaching. Columbus, Ohio: Pearson.
22.
JonesB., ValdezG., NowakowskiJ., & RasmussenC. (1994). Designing learning and technology for educational reform. Oak Brooks, IL: North Central Regional Educational Laboratory.
23.
KnowlesM.S. (1970). The modern practice of adult education: Andragogy versus pedagogy. New York, NY: Associated Press.
24.
KnowlesM.S. (1975). Self–directed learning: A guide for learners and teachers. Englewood Cliffs. Prentice Hall/Cambridge.
25.
KnowlesM.S. (1980). The modern practice of adult education. (revised and updated). Chicago: Association Press (originally published in 1970).
26.
KnowlesM.S. (1984). Andragogy in action: Applying modern principles of adult learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey–Bass.
27.
KnudsonR.S. (1980). An alternative approach to the andragogy/pedagogy issue. Lifelong Learning: The Adult Years, 3 (8) 810.
28.
KolbD.A. (1982). Experiential learning. New York, NY: Prentice Hall.
29.
KroksmarkT. (1996). Didaskalos – undervisningsmetodik vid var tideraknings borjan med sarskild inriktning mot Jesu undervisiningsmetodik. Gothenburg, Sweden: Diadalos AB.
30.
LondonJ. (1973). Adult education for the 1970s: Promise or illusion?Adult Education, 24 (1), 60–70.
31.
MasseyM.E. (1979). The people puzzle: Understanding yourself and others. Reston, VA: Reston Publishing Company.
32.
McKenzieL. (1979). A response to Elias. Adult Education, 29 (4), 256–260.
33.
MezirowJ. (1981). A critical theory of adult education. Adult Education, 32, 22. Retrieved from http://aeq.sagepub.com
34.
MezirowJ. (1991). Transformative dimensions of adult learning. San Francisco, CA; Jossey Bass.
35.
MezirowJ. (1997). Transformative Learning: Theory to Practice. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 74, 5–12.
36.
MezirowJ. (2000). Learning as transformation: Critical perspectives on a theory in progress. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
37.
MintzbergH. (2004). Developing theory about the development of theory. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Nottingham Andragogy Group. (1983). Towards a developmental theory of andragogy. Monograph No. 9. Adults: Psychological and Educational Perspectives. Nottingham, UK: University of Nottingham, Department of Education.
41.
PiagetJ. (1967). Six psychological studies. New York, NY: Random House.
42.
PietrykowskiB. (1996). Knowledge and power in adult education: Beyond Freire and Habermas. Adult Education Quarterly, 46(2), 82–97.
43.
PintrichP.R. & GrootE.V. (1990). Motivational and self–regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33–40.
44.
RachalJ. R. (1983). The andragogy–pedagogy debate: Another voice in the fray. Lifelong Learning: The Adult Years, 6(9), 14–15.
WangV.C.X. (2005). Perceptions of the teaching preferences of online instructors. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 16(3), 33–53.
49.
WangV. & SarboL. (2004). Philosophy, role of adult educators, and learning: How contextually adapted philosophies and the situational role of educators affects learners’ transformation and emancipation. Journal of Transformative Education, 2(3), 204–214.
