Scholarly conferences are one mechanism by which doctoral students can enter into their profession as practitioners and scholars. Unfortunately, research about the effectiveness of this career development strategy is limited. This paper explores learning experiences of doctoral students at a scholarly conference. Theories about learning communities, communities of practice, and knowledge creation frame student experiences. Special attention is given to how legitimate peripheral participation describes interactions of students with the scholarly community of practice during the conference. Recommendations for students, faculty, other scholars, and program planners are given in order to promote improved access to and participation in the scholarly community. Such changes can provide doctoral students with a smoother transition from academic learning to learning in the scholarly community of a professional conference.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Academy of Human Resource Development. (n.d.). AHRD mission. Retrieved November 14, 2007, from http://www.ahrd.org.
2.
BoucouvalasM. (1985). How to profit from attending a conference. In IlsleyP. J. (Ed.), Improving Conference Design and Outcomes (pp. 43–56. New Directions in Continuing Education. San Francisco: Jossey‐Bass.
3.
ChapmanD. D.WiessnerC. A.Storberg‐WalkerJ.HatcherT. (2007). New learning: A different way of approaching conference evaluation. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 5 (4), 261–270.
4.
ChinowskyP.MolenaarK.RealphA. (2007). Learning organizations in construction. Journal of Management in Engineering, 23, 27–34.
5.
CoffeyA.AtkinsonP. (1996). Making sense of qualitative data: Complementary research strategies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
6.
CreswellJ. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7.
FullerA.HodkinsonH.HodkinsonP.UnwinL. (2005). Learning as peripheral participation in communities of practice: A reassessment of key concepts in workplace learning. British Educational Research Journal, 31 (1), 49–68.
8.
GrahamP.KormanikM. (2004). Bridging the conference gap: A challenge to enhance the research practice dialogue. Human Resource Development International, 7 (3), 391–394.
9.
HatcherT.WiessnerC. A.Storberg‐WalkerJ. (2005). New learning ′05: What new learning emerged from the 2005 AHRD conference and how did it happen? In MorrisM. L. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2005 International Research Conference of the AHRD (pp. 1338–1345. Denver, CO: AHRD.
10.
HatcherT.WiessnerC. A.Storberg‐WalkerJ.ChapmanD. (2005). How a professional conference created new learning: A case study. Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on HRD Research & Practice in Europe (no. 223). Leeds, UK.
11.
HatcherT.WiessnerC. A.Storberg‐WalkerJ.ChapmanD. (2006). How a professional conference created new learning: A case study. Journal of European Industrial Training, 30 (4), 256–271.
12.
HayK. (1996). Legitimate peripheral participation, instructionism and constructivism: Whose situation is it anyway? In McLellanH. (Ed.), Situated learning perspectives (pp. 89–100). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
13.
HilliardT. W. (2006). Learning at conventions: Integrating communities of practice. Journal of Convention and Event Tourism, 8 (1), 45–68.
14.
KroughG. V.IchijoK.NonakaI. (2000). Enabling knowledge creation: How to unlock the mystery of tacit knowledge and release the power of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.
15.
IlsleyP. J. (1985). Improving conference design and outcomes. In IlsleyP. J. (Ed.), Improving conference design and outcomes (pp. 87–92. New Directions for Continuing Education. San Francisco: Jossey‐Bass.
MerriamS. B. (1998) Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey‐Bass.
19.
MeyerS. (1985). Maximizing the conference experience for first‐time participants. In IlsleyP. J. (Ed.), Improving conference design and outcomes (57–68). New Directions in Continuing Education. San Francisco: Jossey‐Bass.
20.
PattonM. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
21.
Storberg‐WalkerJ.WiessnerC. A.ChapmanD. D. (2005). How the AHRD 2005 conference created new learning: Preliminary results of a case study. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 16, 547–555.
22.
StraussA.CorbinJ. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and Techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
23.
WengerE. C.SnyderW. M. (2000). Communities of practice: The organizational frontier. Harvard Business Review, 78 (1), 139–145.
24.
WiessnerC. A.HatcherT.ChapmanD. D.Storberg‐WalkerJ. (2008). Creating new learning at professional conferences: An innovative approach to conference learning, knowledge construction and program evaluation. Human Resource Development International, 11 (4), 367–383.
