Writing across Power Lines: Authorship in Scholarly Collaborations

Acedo F. J. Barroso C. Casanueva C. Galán J. (2006). Co‐authorship in management and organizational studies: An empirical and network analysis. Journal of Management Studies, 43, 957–983.

American Educational Research Association. (2004). Ethical standards. III. Guiding standards: Intellectual ownership. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved on March 22, 2008, from http:www.aera.netAboutAERADefault.aspxmenu_id90&id175&termsauthorshipstandards&searchtype1&fragmentFalse.

American Psychological Association. (2002). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved on March 22, 2008, from http:www.apa.orgethics.

Fine M. A. Kurdek L. A. (1993). Reflections on determining authorship credit and authorship order on faculty‐staff collaborations. American Psychologist, 48, 1141–1147.

Long R. G. Bowers W. P. Barnett T. White M. C. (1998). Research productivity of graduates in management: Effects of academic origin and academic affiliation. The Academy of Management Journal, 41(6), 704–714.

McDowell J. M. Amacher R. C. (1986). Economic value of an in‐house editorship. Public Choice, 48, 101–12.

Sobel R. S. Taylor J. J. (2004). The last 30 years of public choice: An analysis of author and institution ranking. Public Choice, 120(3–4), 331–352.

White J. (1986). Dissertations and publications in public administration. Public Administration Review, 46, 227–234.

White J. D. Adams G. B. Forrester J. P. (1996). Knowledge and theory development in public administration: the role of doctoral education and research. Public Administration Review, 56(5), 441–452.