Use of the World Wide Web (WWW) for instruction has grown dramatically in the last two years. Almost every major university in the US has some distance education offering. Increasing competition and shrinking resources within public institutions have accelerated the growth of this technological innovation. Recent press on the subject suggests, however, that “education at a distance” is meeting tremendous resistance in some corners.
ChristensenC. (1997). The innovator's dilemma, Boston, MA: Havard Business School Press.
3.
DuchastelP.A. (19961997). A web‐based model for university instruction. Journal Educational Technology Systems, 25(3), 221–228.
4.
LucasR. (1998). An ecology of distance learning. Syllabus, 11(10), 14–22.
5.
MowenA.J. and ParksS. C. (1997). Competitive marketing of distance education: A model for placing quality within a strategic planning context. The American Journal of Distance Education, 11(3), 27–40.
6.
NeeleyL.NiemiJ. A., and EhrhardB. J. (1998). Classes going the distance so people don't have to: Instructional opportunities for adult learners. T.H.E. Journal, 26(4), 72–74.
StampsD. (1998). The for‐profit future of higher education. Training, August, 23–29.
10.
U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (1998). Fall enrollment in institutions of higher education; Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS), Fall enrollment surveys; Projections of educational statistics to 2008; and U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, Current Population Reports, Social and economic characteristics of students. various years. (prepared September, 1998 and available online at http://nces.ed.gov/pubs99).
11.
WolcottL. L. (1997). Tenure, Promotion, and Distance Education: Examining the Culture of Faculty Rewards. The American Journal of Distance Education, 11 (2), 3–18.
