The results of a national survey of mail order customers are shared. The findings suggest that consumers are aware of the tax benefit associated with mail order and that this benefit plays a more significant role in purchase decisions than popularly believed. The results are a “red flag” for the mail order industry about the potential deleterious impact on sales if sales tax is mandated.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Advisory Council on Intergovernmental Relations (1986, April), State and Local Taxation of Out-Of-State Mail Order Sales, Robert B. Hawkins, Chair, Report No. A105, Washington, DC: ACIR.
2.
BerkowitzE.WaltonJ.WalterO.In-Home Shoppers: The Market for Innovative Distribution SystemsJournal of Retailing197915–33Summer
3.
CunninghamI.CunninghamW.The Urban In-Home Shopper: Socioeconomic and Attitudinal CharacteristicsJournal of Retailing197342–50Fall
4.
DarianJ.In-Home Shopping: Are There Consumer Segments?Journal of Retailing1987163–186Summer
5.
DybdahlC.Catalog Retailing Cools Down After Growth of the 1980sChain Store Age Executive199238A–39AAugust
6.
EdwardsP.Study Probes Consumers’ Attitudes on Direct BuyingAdvertising Age681985June 17
7.
GillettP.A Profile of Urban In-Home ShoppersJournal of Marketing197040–45July
8.
GuptaU.Mail-Order Concerns Fight State Sales TaxesThe Wall Street Journal1990B1–B2March 22
9.
MittelstaedtR.StassenR.The Macromarketing Effects of the Tazation of Interstate Mail-Order SalesJournal of Macromarketing199146–56Spring
10.
MowenJ.WienerJ.YoungC.Consumer Store Choice and Sales TaxesJournal of Retailing1990222–240Summer
11.
PetersW.FordN.A Profile of Urban In-Home Shoppers: The Other HalfJournal of Marketing197262–64January
12.
ReynoldsF.An Analysis of Catalog Buying BehaviorJournal of Marketing197447–51July
13.
SrodesJ.Murdering Mail OrderFinancial World199264–67March 31
14.
U.S. Senate Committee on Finance (1988), Hearings on Collection of State Sales and Use Taxes by Out-of-State Vendors, 100th Congress, 1st Session.
