Abstract
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.Brief of Amicus Curiae The Tax Policy Research Project (May 26, 1992), Quill Corporation v. North Dakota , 60 USLW 4423.
2.Brief for Petitioner (May 26, 1992), Quill Corporation v. North Dakota , 60 USLW 4423.
3.Brief for Respondent (May 26, 1992), Quill Corporation v. North Dakota , 60 USLW 4423.
4.
Bruskin
Parker
State Sales Taxes on Services: Massachusetts As a Case Study
Tax Lawyer
45
1991
49
5.Burger King v. Rudzewicz (1985),471 US 462.
6.
Cain
Collecting Taxes on Mail-Ordered Goods: The Time is Coming
Journal of Direct Marketing
5
1991
20
7.Complete Auto Transit v. Brady (1977), 430 US 274.
8.Goldberg v. Sweet (1989),488 US 252.
9.
Hartman
Collection of Use Tax on Out-of-State Mail-Order Sales
Vanderbilt L Rev
39
1986
993
10.International Shoe v. Washington (1945), 326 US 310.
11.
McCray
Overturning Bellas Hess: Due Process Considerations, 1985
B.Y.U. L. Rev
265
1985
12.National Bellas Hess v. Department of Revenue (1967), 386 us 753.
13.National Geographic Society v. California Board of Equalization (1977), 430 US 551.
14.Quill Corporation v. North Dakota (May 26,1992), 60 USLW 4423.
15.
Rothfeld
Mail-Order Sales and State Jurisdiction to Tax
Tax Notes
1405
1991
December 23
16.State v. Quill Corporation (N.D. 1991), 470 N.W. 2d 203.