In this article we describe empirical and normative rules for the space allocation in catalogs and the underlying assumptions regarding the demand function. Usefulness and limitations of the two approaches for measuring demand response functions are studied from an empirical point of view. The empirical space allocation rule, space as a percentage of profit, seems to be a good starting point and can be improved as the initially rather unstable elasticities are better known.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BultezA.NaertP.Asymmetric Cannibalism in Retail AssortmentsJournal of Retailing6521989153–192Summer
2.
BultezA.NaertP.SH.A.R.P.: Shelf Allocation for Retailers’ ProfitMarketing ScienceVII31988211–231Summer
3.
CorstjensM.DoyleA Model for Optimizing Retail Space AllocationManagement ScienceXXVII71981822–833July
4.
DesmetP.Relation surface––ventes pour la vente par CatalogueRecherche et Applications en MarketingVI2199167–82
HansenP.HeinsbroekH.Product Selection and Space Allocation in SupermarketsEuropean Journal of Operational ResearchIII1979485–498
8.
JohnsonM.ZoltnersA.SinhaP.An Allocation Model for Catalog Space PlanningManagement ScienceXXV21979117–129February
9.
RaoV.SimonJ.Optimal Allocation of Space in Retail Advertisements and Mail-order Catalogues: Theory and a First-approximation Decision RuleInternational Journal of Advertising111983123–129
10.
SokolickW.HartungP.Catalog Advertising AllocationManagement ScienceXV101969 B.521–B.529 June
11.
Von TuckerJ.Catalog SalesNashE.Direct Marketing Handbook1984McGraw-Hill661–688Ch. 46