This study investigates similarity among products not selected by a comparability criterion, on the basis of a large database containing information about consumers’ purchases of direct mail products. Products are represented by their buyers, and similarity among them is derived from the tendency of the products to be consumed jointly. These similarities are examined against experts’ categorization of the products. Applications for direct marketing are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlpertLewisGattyRonaldProduct Positioning by Behavioral Life StyleJournal of Marketing335196965–69
2.
AssaelH.SolomonM.R.A Social Categorization Approach to Consumption SymbolismPsychology and Marketing531988235–257
3.
BettmanJames B.SujanMitaEffects of Framing on Evaluation of Comparable and Noncomparable Alternatives by Expert and Novice ConsumersJournal of Consumer Research141987141–154September
4.
EislerH.EkmanG.A.A Mechanism of Subjective SimilarityActa Psychologica1619591–10
5.
GregsonR.A.M.Psychometrics of Similarity1975Academic PressNY
6.
Ganzach, Yoav (19891, “Frequency of Purchase and the Prediction of Buying Behavior: The Case of Direct Mail,” Working paper, the Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
7.
HolbrookMorris B.HirschmanElizabeth C.The Experiential Aspects of Consumption: Consumer Fantasies, Feelings and FunJournal of Consumer Research91982132–140September
8.
HolbrookMooreWilliamL.WinerRusselS.Constructing Joint Spaces from Pick-Any Data: A New Tool for Consumer AnalysisJournal of Consumer Research9198299–105June
9.
JohnsonMichael D.Consumer Choice Strategies for Comparing Noncomparable AlternativesJournal of Consumer Research111984741–753December
10.
JohnsonMichael D.Modeling Choice Strategies for Noncomparable AlternativesMarketing Science51198637–54
11.
JohnsonMichael D.ClasesFornellThe Nature and Methodological Implications of the Cognitive Representation of ProductsJournal of Consumer Research141987214–228
12.
LehamanDonald R.Evaluating Marketing Strategy in a Multiple Brand MarketJournal of Business Administration3197115–26Fall
13.
LehamanDonald R.Judged Similarity and Brand-Switching Data as Similarity MeasuresJournal of Marketing Research91972331–334August
14.
LevineJoel H.Joint Space Analysis of ‘pick-Any’ Data: Analysis of Choices from an Unconstrained Set of AlternativesPsychometrika44197985–92
15.
TverskyAmosFeatures of SimilarityPsychological Review8441977327–352
