This study examines the ethical issues involved in the use of marketing research as a sales ploy and reports results from four national studies investigating the extent to which consumers have experienced this deceptive technique. Findings indicate that concern is warranted regarding the wide extent (and perhaps increased use) of this ploy in direct marketing today. The authors recommend that both direct marketers and marketing researchers take an active position in curtailing the use of this sales technique.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AackerDavid A.DayGeorge S.Consumerism: Search for the Consumer InterestFourth ed.1982The Free PressNew York
2.
American Marketing Association (1972), Marketing Research Code of Ethics.
3.
BaxterRichardAn Inquiry Into the Misuse of the Survey Technique by Sales SolicitorsPublic Opinion Quarterly281964124–134Spring
4.
BranniganMarthaPseudo Polls: More Surveys Draw Criticism for Motives and MethodsThe Wall Street Journal198727January 29
5.
FreyCynthia J.KinnearThomas C.Legal Constraints and Marketing Research: Review and Call to ActionJournal of Marketing Research161979295–302August
6.
SchneiderKenneth C.HolmCynthia K.Deceptive Practices in Marketing Research: The Consumer's ViewpointCalifornia Management Review24198289–96Spring
7.
SheetsThomasRadlinskiAllenKohneJamesBrunnerAllenDeceived Respondents: Once Bitten, Twice ShyPublic Opinion Quarterly381974261–263Summer
8.
TyboutAlice M.ZaltmanGeraldEthics in Marketing Research: Their Practical RelevanceJournal of Marketing Research91974357–368November
9.
U.S. Federal Trade Commission (1962), Federal Trade Commission Decisions: 61, The Pulse Inc., Docket C-291.
