American College Personnel Association. (1994). The student learning imperative: Implications for student affairs.Washington, DC: Author.
3.
American Council on Higher Education. (1937). 1937 Student Personnel Point of View, Point of View (37–50). Washington, D.C.: NASPA.
4.
Baxter MagoldaM. (1999). Engaging students in active learning. In BlimlingG. S., WhittE. J., & Associates (Eds.), Good practice in student affairs: Principles to foster student learning (pp. 21–44). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
5.
CarpenterS. (2001). Student affairs scholarship (re?)consid-ered: Toward a scholarship of practice. Journal of College Student Development, 42(4), 301–317.
6.
CollinsP. H. (1995). Mammies, matriarchs, and other controlling images. In CollinsP. H. (Ed.), Black feminist thought (pp. 67–90). New York: Routledge.
7.
InkelasK. K., & WeismanJ. L. (2003). Different by design: An examination of student outcomes among participants in three types of living-learning programs. Journal of College Student Development, 44(5), 335–368.
8.
KeelingR. P. (Ed.). (2004). Learning reconsidered: A campus-wide focus on the student experience.Washington, DC: National Association of Student Personnel Administrators & American College Personnel Association.
9.
RobertsD. C. (2007). Deeper learning in leadership.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
10.
WinstonR. B., TorresV., CarpenterD. S., McLntireD. D., & PetersenB. (2001). Staffing student affairs: A survey of practices. College Student Affairs Journal, 21(1), 7–25.