U.S. Supreme Court opinions have left some doors open for institutions to build the kinds of diverse student populations that are known to enrich the learning of all students. But simply inviting diverse students through those doors is not doing nearly enough.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ArensonK.W.“62 Top Colleges Endorse Bias in Admissions.”New York Times, April 24, 1997, p. A27.
2.
BowenW.“Admissions and the Relevance of Race.”Princeton Alumni Weekly, Sept.26, 1977, pp. 7, 9.
3.
BrestP., and OshigeM.“Affirmative Action for Whom?”Stanford Law Review, 1995, 47(5), 855–900.
4.
ChangM. J., WittD., JonesJ., and HakutaK. (eds.). Compelling Interest: Examining the Evidence on Racial Dynamics in Colleges and Universities.Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 2003.
5.
Gratz v. Bollinger, 123 S.Ct. 2411. 2003.
6.
Grutter v. Bollinger, 123 S.Ct. 2325. 2003.
7.
HaleF.W. (ed.). What Makes Racial Diversity Work in Higher Education: Academic Leaders Present Successful Policies and Strategies.Sterling, Va.: Stylus, 2004.
8.
HurtadoS., DeyE. L., GurinP. P., and GurinG.“College Environments, Diversity, and Student Learning.” In SmartJ. C. (ed.), Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research. Vol. 18. Amsterdam: Kluwer, 2003.
9.
Keyishian v. Board of Regents, 385 U.S. 589, 603. 1967.
10.
KirkelieS.M.“Higher Education Admissions and Diversity.”Willamette Law Review, 2002, 38, 615.
11.
MillsC.W.Sociological Imagination.New York: Oxford University Press, 1959.
12.
PalmerS.R.“Diversity and Affirmative Action: Evolving Principles and Continuing Legal Battles.” In OrfieldG., and KurlaenderM. (eds.), Diversity Challenged: Evidence on the Impact of Affirmative Action.Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Education Publishing Group, 2001.
