ChronicleEP, ChanMY, HawkingsC, et al.. You can tell by the nose—judging sex from an isolated facial feature. Perception. 1995; 24(8):969-973. doi:10.1068/p240969, 8848363
2.
NoureaiSA, RandhawaP, AndrewsPJ, SalehHA. The role of nasal feminization rhinoplasty in male-to-female gender reassignment. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2007; 9(5):318-320. 17875823
3.
DempfR, EckertAW. Contouring the forehead and rhinoplasty in the feminization of the face in male-to-female transsexuals. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2010; 38(6):416-422. doi:10.1016/j.jcms.2009.11.003, 20036572
NassifPS. Male revision rhinoplasty: pearls and surgical techniques. Facial Plast Surg. 2005; 21(4):250-270. doi:10.1055/s-2006-939504, 16575703
6.
NainiFB, CobourneMT, GaragiolaU, McDonaldF, WertheimD. Nasofacial angle and nasal prominence: a quantitative investigation of idealized and normative values. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2016; 44(4):446-452. doi:10.1016/j.jcms.2016.01.010, 26880014
7.
NainiFB, CobourneMT, GaragiolaU, McDonaldF, WertheimD. Nasofrontal angle and nasal dorsal aesthetics: a quantitative investigation of idealized and normative values. Facial Plast Surg. 2016; 32(4):444-451. doi:10.1055/s-0036-1584234, 27494590
8.
NainiFB, CobourneMT, GaragiolaU, McDonaldF, WertheimD. Mentolabial angle and aesthetics: a quantitative investigation of idealized and normative values. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017; 39(1):4. doi:10.1186/s40902-017-0102-8, 28217687
9.
NellisJC, et al.. Association of rhinoplasty with perceived attractiveness, success, and overall health. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2018; 20(2):97-102. doi:10.1001/jamafacial.2016.2206, 29049490
10.
KandathilCK, SaltychevM, MoubayedSP, MostSP. Association of dorsal reduction and tip rotation with social perception. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2018; 20(5):362-366. doi:10.1001/jamafacial.2018.0317, 29879285
11.
van SchijndelO, TasmanAJ, LitschelR. The nose influences visual and personality perception. Facial Plast Surg. 2015; 31(5):439-445. doi:10.1055/s-0035-1565009, 26579860
12.
WebsterRC, DavidsonTM, SmithRC. Nasofrontal angle changes in rhinoplasty. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg (1979). 1979; 87(1):95-108. doi:10.1177/019459987908700123, 503481
13.
FarkasLG. Anthropometry of the attractive North American Caucasian face. In: FarkasLG, ed. Anthropometry of the Head and Face. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Raven Press; 1994.
14.
SinnoHH, MarkarianMK, IbrahimAMS, LinSJ. The ideal nasolabial angle in rhinoplasty: a preference analysis of the general population. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014; 134(2):201-210. doi:10.1097/PRS.0000000000000385, 25068320
KimDW, EganKK. Metrics of nasal tip rotation: a comparative analysis. Laryngoscope. 2006; 116(6):872-877. doi:10.1097/01.mlg.0000216796.63683.d3, 16735896
17.
SpringerIN, ZernialO, NölkeF, et al.. Gender and nasal shape: measures for rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008; 121(2):629-637. doi:10.1097/01.prs.0000298095.18943.72, 18300984
18.
ReDE, HunterDW, CoetzeeV, et al.. Looking like a leader-facial shape predicts perceived height and leadership ability. PLoS One. 2013; 8(12):e80957. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0080957, 24324651
19.
GenioleSN, DensonTF, DixsonBJ, CarréJM, McCormickCM. Evidence from meta-analyses of the facial width-to-height ratio as an evolved cue of threat. PLoS One. 2015; 10(7):e0132726. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0132726, 26181579
20.
KwartDG, FoulshamT, KingstoneA. Age and beauty are in the eye of the beholder. Perception. 2012; 41(8):925-938. doi:10.1068/p7136, 23362670
21.
JonesAL, PorcheronA, SwedaJR, MorizotF, RussellR. Coloration in different areas of facial skin is a cue to health: The role of cheek redness and periorbital luminance in health perception. Body Image. 2016; 17:57-66. doi:10.1016/j.bodyim.2016.02.001, 26967010
22.
TsankovaE, KappasA. Facial skin smoothness as an indicator of perceived trustworthiness and related traits. Perception. 2016; 45(4):400-408. doi:10.1177/0301006615616748, 26621963
