BogartKR, BriegelW, ColeJ. On the consequences of living without facial expression. In: MüllerC, CienkiA, FrickeE, LadewigSH, McNeillD, TessendorfS, eds. Handbook of Body – Language – Communication: An International Handbook on Multimodality in Human Interaction. Berlin, Germany: Walter de Gruyter; 2013:1969-1982.
2.
FattahAY, GurusingheAD, GavilanJ, et al.; Sir Charles Bell Society. Facial nerve grading instruments: systematic review of the literature and suggestion for uniformity. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015; 135(2):569-579. doi:10.1097/PRS.0000000000000905, 25357164
3.
NiziolR, HenryFP, LeckenbyJI, GrobbelaarAO. Is there an ideal outcome scoring system for facial reanimation surgery? a review of current methods and suggestions for future publications. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2015; 68(4):447-456. doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2014.12.015, 25589458
4.
FattahAY, GavilanJ, HadlockTA, et al.. Survey of methods of facial palsy documentation in use by members of the Sir Charles Bell Society. Laryngoscope. 2014; 124(10):2247-2251. doi:10.1002/lary.24636, 24496778
5.
PorterME. What is value in health care?. N Engl J Med. 2010; 363(26):2477-2481. doi:10.1056/NEJMp1011024, 21142528
6.
PorterME, KaplanRS. How to pay for health care. Harv Bus Rev. 2016; 94(7-8):88-98, 100, 134. 27526565
7.
ZerilloJA, SchouwenburgMG, van BommelACM, et al.; Colorectal Cancer Working Group of the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement (ICHOM). An international collaborative standardizing a comprehensive patient-centered outcomes measurement set for colorectal cancer. JAMA Oncol. 2017; 3(5):686-694. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.0417, 28384684
8.
OngWL, SchouwenburgMG, van BommelACM, et al.. A standard set of value-based patient-centered outcomes for breast cancer: the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement (ICHOM) initiative. JAMA Oncol. 2017; 3(5):677-685. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.4851, 28033439
9.
MartinNE, MasseyL, StowellC, et al.. Defining a standard set of patient-centered outcomes for men with localized prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2015; 67(3):460-467. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2014.08.075, 25234359
10.
SalinasJ, SprinkhuizenSM, AckersonT, et al.. An international standard set of patient-centered outcome measures after stroke. Stroke. 2016; 47(1):180-186. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.010898, 26604251
11.
McNamaraRL, SpatzES, KelleyTA, et al.. Standardized outcome measurement for patients with coronary artery disease: consensus from the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement (ICHOM). J Am Heart Assoc. 2015; 4(5):e001767. doi:10.1161/JAHA.115.001767, 25991011
12.
ClementRC, WelanderA, StowellC, et al.. A proposed set of metrics for standardized outcome reporting in the management of low back pain. Acta Orthop. 2015; 86(5):523-533. doi:10.3109/17453674.2015.1036696, 25828191
13.
MorgansAK, van BommelAC, StowellC, et al.; Advanced Prostate Cancer Working Group of the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement. Development of a standardized set of patient-centered outcomes for advanced prostate cancer: an international effort for a unified approach. Eur Urol. 2015; 68(5):891-898. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2015.06.007, 26129856
14.
PrinsenCA, VohraS, RoseMR, et al.. Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) initiative: protocol for an international Delphi study to achieve consensus on how to select outcome measurement instruments for outcomes included in a ‘core outcome set’. Trials. 2014; 15:247. doi:10.1186/1745-6215-15-247, 24962012
WickertNM, Wong RiffKWY, MansourM, et al.. Content validity of patient-reported outcome instruments used with pediatric patients with facial differences: a systematic review. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2018; 55(7):989-998. doi:10.1597/16-148, 28001100
YanagiharaN. Grading of facial nerve palsy. In: Fisch U, ed. Facial Nerve Surgery, Proceedings: Third International Symposium on Facial Nerve Surgery. Birmingham, AL; Aesculapius Publishing; 1977:533–535.
19.
VrabecJT, BackousDD, DjalilianHR, et al.; Facial Nerve Disorders Committee. Facial nerve grading system 2.0. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009; 140(4):445-450. doi:10.1016/j.otohns.2008.12.031, 19328328
20.
MurtyGE, DiverJP, KellyPJ, O’DonoghueGM, BradleyPJ. The Nottingham System: objective assessment of facial nerve function in the clinic. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1994; 110:156-161. doi:10.1177/019459989411000203, 8108150
21.
KayhanFT, ZurakowskiD, RauchSD. Toronto facial grading system: interobserver reliability. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000; 122(2):212-215. doi:10.1016/S0194-5998(00)70241-5, 10652392
22.
HuWL, RossB, NedzelskiJ. Reliability of the Sunnybrook facial grading system by novice users. J Otolaryngol. 2001; 30(4):208-211. doi:10.2310/7070.2001.20148, 11771031
23.
CoulsonSE, CroxsonGR, AdamsRD, O’DwyerNJ. Reliability of the “Sydney,” “Sunnybrook,” and “House Brackmann” facial grading systems to assess voluntary movement and synkinesis after facial nerve paralysis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005; 132(4):543-549. doi:10.1016/j.otohns.2005.01.027, 15806042
24.
NeelyJG, CherianNG, DickersonCB, NedzelskiJM. Sunnybrook facial grading system: reliability and criteria for grading. Laryngoscope. 2010; 120(5):1038-1045. doi:10.1002/lary.20868, 20422701
25.
BurresS, FischU. The comparison of facial grading systems. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1986; 112(7):755-758. doi:10.1001/archotol.1986.03780070067015, 3707739
26.
BanksCA, JowettN, HadlockTA. Test-retest reliability and agreement between in-person and video assessment of facial mimetic function using the eFACE facial grading system. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2017; 19(3):206-211. doi:10.1001/jamafacial.2016.1620, 28006048
27.
BanksCA, JowettN, AzizzadehB, et al.. Worldwide testing of the eFACE facial nerve clinician-graded scale. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017; 139(2):491e-498e. doi:10.1097/PRS.0000000000002954, 28121888
28.
ForrestCB, BevansKB, PratiwadiR, et al.. Development of the PROMIS® pediatric global health (PGH-7) measure. Qual Life Res. 2014; 23(4):1221-1231. doi:10.1007/s11136-013-0581-8, 24264804
29.
ForrestCB, TuckerCA, Ravens-SiebererU, et al.. Concurrent validity of the PROMIS pediatric global health measure. Qual Life Res. 2016; 25(3):739-751. doi:10.1007/s11136-015-1111-7, 26310283
30.
DewaltDA, ThissenD, StuckyBD, et al.. PROMIS pediatric peer relationships scale: development of a peer relationships item bank as part of social health measurement. Health Psychol. 2013; 32(10):1093-1103. doi:10.1037/a0032670, 23772887
31.
Kashikar-ZuckS, CarleA, BarnettK, et al.. Longitudinal evaluation of patient-reported outcomes measurement information systems measures in pediatric chronic pain. Pain. 2016; 157(2):339-347. doi:10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000378, 26447704
32.
VarniJW, ThissenD, StuckyBD, et al.. Item-level informant discrepancies between children and their parents on the PROMIS pediatric scales. Qual Life Res. 2015; 24(8):1921-1937. doi:10.1007/s11136-014-0914-2, 25560776
33.
ShaversVL. Measurement of socioeconomic status in health disparities research. J Natl Med Assoc. 2007; 99(9):1013-1023. 17913111
34.
KahnJB, GliklichRE, BoyevKP, StewartMG, MetsonRB, McKennaMJ. Validation of a patient-graded instrument for facial nerve paralysis: the FaCE scale. Laryngoscope. 2001; 111(3):387-398. doi:10.1097/00005537-200103000-00005, 11224766
35.
VanSwearingenJM, BrachJS. The Facial Disability Index: reliability and validity of a disability assessment instrument for disorders of the facial neuromuscular system. Phys Ther. 1996; 76(12):1288-1298. doi:10.1093/ptj/76.12.1288, 8959998
36.
BaschE, DealAM, KrisMG, et al.. Symptom monitoring with patient-reported outcomes during routine cancer treatment: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol. 2016; 34(6):557-565. doi:10.1200/JCO.2015.63.0830, 26644527
