KlassenAF, CanoSJ, EastCA, . Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the FACE-Q Scales for Patients Undergoing Rhinoplasty. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2016; 18(1):27-35. 26605889
2.
KlassenAF, CanoSJ, GrottingJC, . FACE-Q Eye Module for measuring patient-reported outcomes following cosmetic eye treatments [published online September 15, 2016]. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. doi:10.1001/jamafacial.2016.1018.
3.
KlassenAF, CanoSJ, PusicAL. Use of FACE-Q to Measure Quality of Life Following Aesthetic Facial Treatments. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2016; 18(2):148-149. 26985977
4.
PetrilloJ, CanoSJ, McLeodLD, CoonCD. Using classical test theory, item response theory, and Rasch measurement theory to evaluate patient-reported outcome measures: a comparison of worked examples. Value Health. 2015; 18(1):25-34. 25595231
5.
ChambersKJ, HorstkotteKA, ShanleyK, LindsayRW. Evaluation of Improvement in Nasal Obstruction Following Nasal Valve Correction in Patients With a History of Failed Septoplasty. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2015; 17(5):347-350. 26291169
6.
LindsayRW, BhamaP, HohmanM, HadlockTA. Prospective evaluation of quality-of-life improvement after correction of the alar base in the flaccidly paralyzed face. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2015; 17(2):108-112. 25554967
7.
HadlockT. Standard Outcome Measures in Facial Paralysis: Getting on the Same Page. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2016; 18(2):85-86. 26746124
8.
HorstkotteK, BrooksM, LindsayRW. Creation of an Electronic Data Repository for Patients With Nasal Obstruction Undergoing Functional Rhinoplasty. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2016; 18(1):73-75. 26540027
9.
HumeKM, CrottyCA, SimmonsCJ, NeumeisterMW, ChungKC. Medical specialty society-sponsored data registries: opportunities in plastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013; 132(1):159e-167e. 23806935
