Patient Databases and Clinical Registries in Facial Plastic Surgery Research—Looking at Outcomes Data on a Broader Scale

Abstract

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Spataro

, Piccirillo

, Kallogjeri

, Branham

, Desai

. Revision rates and risk factors of 175 842 patients undergoing septorhinoplasty [published online March 10, 2016]. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. doi:10.1001/jamafacial.2015.2194.

Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project. National (Nationwide) HCUP Databases. Updated December 11, 2015. http://www.ahrq.gov/research/data/hcup/index.html. Accessed January 15, 2016.

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality . AHRQ issue brief: harnessing the power of data: how AHRQ is catalyzing transformation in health care. Publication 15-0065. http://www.ahrq.gov/research/findings/factsheets/informatic/databrief/index.html. Published August 2015. Accessed January 16, 2016.

Tadisina

, Chopra

, Mohan

, Singh

. Nationwide incidence, cost, and epidemiologic trends in facial rhytidectomy: an examination of inpatient facelifts using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database. Aesthet Surg J. 2015; 35(8):NP266-NP268. 26019237

Gliklich

, Dreyer

, Leavy

, eds. Registries for Evaluating Patient Outcomes: A User’s Guide [Internet]. 3rd ed. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Report 13(14)-EHC111. http://www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/registries-guide-3.cfm. Published April 2014. Accessed December 12, 2015. 24945055

Ishii

. Registry 101: what is it and how is it used? http://www.entnet.org/content/otoregistry. Published July 2015. Accessed January 21, 2016.