To describe a highly quantitative facial function–measuring tool that yields accurate, objective measures of facial position in significantly less time than existing methods.
Methods
Facial Assessment by Computer Evaluation (FACE) software was designed for facial analysis. Outputs report the static facial landmark positions and dynamic facial movements relevant in facial reanimation. Fifty individuals underwent facial movement analysis using Photoshop-based measurements and the new software; comparisons of agreement and efficiency were made. Comparisons were made between individuals with normal facial animation and patients with paralysis to gauge sensitivity to abnormal movements.
Results
Facial measurements were matched using FACE software and Photoshop-based measures at rest and during expressions. The automated assessments required significantly less time than Photoshop-based assessments. FACE measurements easily revealed differences between individuals with normal facial animation and patients with facial paralysis.
Conclusions
FACE software produces accurate measurements of facial landmarks and facial movements and is sensitive to paralysis. Given its efficiency, it serves as a useful tool in the clinical setting for zonal facial movement analysis in comprehensive facial nerve rehabilitation programs.
Hadlock and Urban describe a highly quantitative facial function–measuring tool that yields accurate, objective measures of facial position in significantly less time than existing methods.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
TerzisJK, KarypidisD. Outcomes of direct muscle neurotisation in adult facial paralysis.. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2011; 64(2):174–184 20643594
TerzisJK, KarypidisD. The outcomes of dynamic procedures for blink restoration in pediatric facial paralysis.. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010; 125(2):629–644 20124848
4.
TerzisJK, KarypidisD. Outcomes of direct muscle neurotization in pediatric patients with facial paralysis.. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009; 124(5):1486–1498 20009835
5.
TerzisJK, OlivaresFS. Long-term outcomes of free-muscle transfer for smile restoration in adults.. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009; 123(3):877–888 19319051
6.
TerzisJK, OlivaresFS. Long-term outcomes of free muscle transfer for smile restoration in children.. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009; 123(2):543–555 19182612
7.
HarrisonDH. Surgical correction of unilateral and bilateral facial palsy.. Postgrad Med J. 2005; 81(959):562–567 16143684
8.
HarrisonDH. The pectoralis minor vascularized muscle graft for the treatment of unilateral facial palsy.. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1985; 75(2):206–216 3969407
9.
UedaK, HariiK, AsatoH, YamadaA. Neurovascular free muscle transfer combined with cross-face nerve grafting for the treatment of facial paralysis in children.. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998; 101(7):1765–1773 9623816
10.
HariiK. Refined microneurovascular free muscle transplantation for reanimation of paralyzed face.. Microsurgery. 1988; 9(3):169–176 3185276
11.
HariiK, OhmoriK, ToriiS. Free gracilis muscle transplantation, with microneurovascular anastomoses for the treatment of facial paralysis: a preliminary report.. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1976; 57(2):133–143 1250883
12.
ManktelowRT, ZukerRM, TomatLR. Facial paralysis measurement with a handheld ruler.. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008; 121(2):435–442 18300959
13.
ManktelowRT, TomatLR, ZukerRM, ChangM. Smile reconstruction in adults with free muscle transfer innervated by the masseter motor nerve: effectiveness and cerebral adaptation.. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006; 118(4):885–899 16980848
ZukerRM, ManktelowRT. A smile for the Möbius' syndrome patient.. Ann Plast Surg. 1989; 22(3):188–194 2735718
16.
RubinLR, LeeGW, SimpsonRL. Reanimation of the long-standing partial facial paralysis.. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1986; 77(1):41–49 3941848
17.
MayM. Muscle transposition for facial reanimation: indications and results.. Arch Otolaryngol. 1984; 110(3):184–189 6704030
18.
RubinLR. The anatomy of a smile: its importance in the treatment of facial paralysis.. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1974; 53(4):384–387 4815693
19.
DenlingerRL, VanSwearingenJM, CohnJF, SchmidtKL. Puckering and blowing facial expressions in people with facial movement disorders.. Phys Ther. 2008; 88(8):909–915 18617578
20.
LinstromCJ. Objective facial motion analysis in patients with facial nerve dysfunction.. Laryngoscope. 2002; 112(7 pt 1):1129–1147 12169889
21.
LinstromCJ, SilvermanCA, ColsonD. Facial motion analysis with a video and computer system after treatment of acoustic neuroma.. Otol Neurotol. 2002; 23(4):572–579 12170163
22.
SchmidtKL, CohnJF, TianY. Signal characteristics of spontaneous facial expressions: automatic movement in solitary and social smiles.. Biol Psychol. 2003; 65(1):49–66 14638288
23.
SchmidtKL, VanSwearingenJM, LevensteinRM. Speed, amplitude, and asymmetry of lip movement in voluntary puckering and blowing expressions: implications for facial assessment.. Motor Control. 2005; 9(3):270–280 16239716
24.
JohnsonPC, BrownH, KuzonWMJr, BallietR, GarrisonJL, CampbellJ. Simultaneous quantitation of facial movements: the maximal static response assay of facial nerve function.. Ann Plast Surg. 1994; 32(2):171–179 8192368
25.
SargentEW, FadhliOA, CohenRS. Measurement of facial movement with computer software.. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1998; 124(3):313–318 9525517
26.
FreyM, JennyA, StüssiE, HandschinS, ManktelowR. Development of a new paresis scoring system for pre- and postoperative evaluation of facial paresis.. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 1994; Dec:S182–S184 10774345
27.
IsonoM, MurataK, TanakaH, KawamotoM, AzumaH. An objective evaluation method for facial mimic motion.. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1996; 114(1):27–31 8570246
28.
TomatRL, ManketelowRT. Evaluation of a new measurement tool for facial paralysis reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005; 115(3):696–704 15731666
29.
CoulsonSE, CroxsonGR, AdamsRD, O’DwyerNJ. Reliability of the “Sydney,” “Sunnybrook,” and “House Brackmann” facial grading systems to assess voluntary movement and synkinesis after facial nerve paralysis.. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005; 132(4):543–549 15806042
30.
BergT, JonssonL, EngströmM. Agreement between the Sunnybrook, House-Brackmann, and Yanagihara facial nerve grading systems in Bell's palsy.. Otol Neurotol. 2004; 25(6):1020–1026 15547437
KahnJB, GliklichRE, BoyevKP, StewartMG, MetsonRB, McKennaMJ. Validation of a patient-graded instrument for facial nerve paralysis: the FaCE scale.. Laryngoscope. 2001; 111(3):387–398 11224766
34.
MehtaRP, Wernick RobinsonM, HadlockTA. Validation of the Synkinesis Assessment Questionnaire.. Laryngoscope. 2007; 117(5):923–926 17473697
35.
O’ReillyBF, SoraghanJJ, McGrenaryS, HeS. Objective method of assessing and presenting the House-Brackmann and regional grades of facial palsy by production of a facogram.. Otol Neurotol. 2010; 31(3):486–491 20042993
36.
CoulsonSE, CroxsonGR, GilleardWL. Three-dimensional quantification of “still” points during normal facial movement.. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1999; 108(3):265–268 10086619
37.
FreyM, JennyA, GiovanoliP, StüssiE. Development of a new documentation system for facial movements as a basis for the international registry for neuromuscular reconstruction in the face.. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1994; 93(7):1334–1349 8208800
38.
Meier-GallatiV, ScribaH, FischU. Objective scaling of facial nerve function based on area analysis (OSCAR).. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1998; 118(4):545–550 9560110
39.
NeelyJG, CheungJY, WoodM, ByersJ, RogersonA. Computerized quantitative dynamic analysis of facial motion in the paralyzed and synkinetic face.. Am J Otol. 1992; 13(2):97–107 1599013
40.
WachtmanGS, CohnJF, VanSwearingenJM, MandersEK. Automated tracking of facial features in patients with facial neuromuscular dysfunction.. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001; 107(5):1124–1133 11373551
41.
YuenK, KawakamiS, OgawaraT, InokuchiI, MaetaM, MasudaY. Evaluation of facial palsy by Moiré topography.. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 1994; Dec:S541–S544 10774445
42.
FreyM, MichaelidouM, TzouCH, et al.. Three-dimensional analysis of the paralyzed face reanimated by cross-face nerve grafting and free gracilis muscle transplantation: quantification of the functional outcome.. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009; 122(6):1709–1722 19050523
43.
HadlockT. Facial paralysis: research and future directions.. Facial Plast Surg. 2008; 24(2):260–267 18470838
44.
BrayD, HenstromDK, CheneyML, HadlockTA. Assessing outcomes in facial reanimation: evaluation and validation of the SMILE system for measuring lip excursion during smiling.. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2010; 12(5):352–354 20855780
45.
SpörriS, SimmenD, BrinerHR, JonesN. Objective assessment of tip projection and the nasolabial angle in rhinoplasty.. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2004; 6(5):295–300 15381573
46.
ChuEA, FarragTY, IshiiLE, ByrnePJ. Threshold of visual perception of facial asymmetry in a facial paralysis model.. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2011; 13(1):14–19 21242426
