To establish whether daily mechanical stimulation improves functional recovery of whisking after facial nerve transection injury and repair in rats.
Methods
Forty rats underwent facial nerve transection injury and repair and subsequent quantitative facial movement testing. Animals were randomized into 2 experimental groups (n = 20 each). Both groups received daily 5-minute manual stimulation of their whiskers, with one group undergoing whisker protraction and the other, whisker retraction. Rats were tested on postoperative weeks 1, 4 through 8, and 15 via a validated, quantitative whisking kinematics apparatus. Whisks were counted and analyzed for whisking amplitude, velocity, and acceleration.
Results
Animals receiving manual stimulation by passive protraction of their whiskers demonstrated significantly improved functional recovery at multiple time points during the 15 weeks compared with historical controls (P < .005; 1-tailed t test). Recovery was similar in the protraction and retraction groups, trending toward better whisking recovery in the protraction group.
Conclusions
Daily mechanical whisker stimulation via either protraction or retraction significantly improves recovery of whisking after facial nerve transection and repair. This finding supports the role of early soft-tissue manipulation after facial nerve repair and may have clinical implications for the postoperative management of patients after facial nerve manipulations.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AngelovDN, Guntinas-LichiusO, WewetzerK, NeissWF, StreppelM. Axonal branching and recovery of coordinated muscle activity after transection of the facial nerve in adult rats.. Adv Anat Embryol Cell Biol. 2005; 180:1–130 16261803
2.
ConstantinidisJ, AkbarianA, SteinhartH, IroH, MautesA. Effects of immediate and delayed facial-facial nerve suture on rat facial muscle.. Acta Otolaryngol. 2003; 123(8):998–1003 14606606
3.
Guntinas-LichiusO, NeissWF, GunkelA, StennertE. Differences in glial, synaptic and motoneuron responses in the facial nucleus of the rat brainstem following facial nerve resection and nerve suture reanastomosis.. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 1994; 251(7):410–417 7857629
4.
Guntinas-LichiusO, WewetzerK, TomovTL, et al.. Transplantation of olfactory mucosa minimizes axonal branching and promotes the recovery of vibrissae motor performance after facial nerve repair in rats.. J Neurosci. 2002; 22(16):7121–7131 12177208
5.
StreppelM, AngelovDN, Guntinas-LichiusO, et al.. Slow axonal regrowth but extreme hyperinnervation of target muscle after suture of the facial nerve in aged rats.. Neurobiol Aging. 1998; 19(1):83–88 9562508
6.
FerriCC, MooreFA, BisbyMA. Effects of facial nerve injury on mouse motoneurons lacking the p75 low-affinity neurotrophin receptor.. J Neurobiol. 1998; 34(1):1–9 9469614
7.
MostSP. Facial nerve recovery in bcl2 overexpression mice after crush injury.. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2004; 6(2):82–87 15023794
8.
YehC, BowersD, HadlockTA. Effect of FK506 on functional recovery after facial nerve injury in the rat.. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2007; 9(5):333–339 17875826
9.
ItoM, OhbayashiM, FurukawaM, OkoyamaS. Neuroprotective effects of TJ-23 (Tokishakuyakusan) on adult rat motoneurons following peripheral facial nerve axotomy.. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007; 136(2):225–230 17275544
10.
ReineckeK, LuciusR, ReineckeA, RickertU, HerdegenT, UngerT. Angiotensin II accelerates functional recovery in the rat sciatic nerve in vivo: role of the AT2 receptor and the transcription factor NF-kappaB.. FASEB J. 2003; 17(14):2094–2096 14500552
González-HernándezT, RustioniA. Nitric oxide synthase and growth-associated protein are coexpressed in primary sensory neurons after peripheral injury.. J Comp Neurol. 1999; 404(1):64–74 9886025
13.
LewinSL, UtleyDS, ChengET, VerityAN, TerrisDJ. Simultaneous treatment with BDNF and CNTF after peripheral nerve transection and repair enhances rate of functional recovery compared with BDNF treatment alone.. Laryngoscope. 1997; 107(7):992–999 9217144
14.
AngelovDN, CeynowaM, Guntinas-LichiusO, et al.. Mechanical stimulation of paralyzed vibrissal muscles following facial nerve injury in adult rat promotes full recovery of whisking.. Neurobiol Dis. 2007; 26(1):229–242 17296303
15.
EvgenievaE, SchweigertP, Guntinas-LichiusO, et al.. Manual stimulation of the suprahyoid-sublingual region diminishes polyinnervation of the motor endplates and improves recovery of function after hypoglossal nerve injury in rats.. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008; 22(6):754–768 18612142
16.
ByrnePJ. Importance of facial expression in facial nerve rehabilitation.. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004; 12(4):332–335 15252257
17.
BermejoR, VyasA, ZeiglerHP. Topography of rodent whisking–I: two-dimensional monitoring of whisker movements.. Somatosens Mot Res. 2002; 19(4):341–346 12590835
18.
BermejoR, HoubenD, ZeiglerHP. Optoelectronic monitoring of individual whisker movements in rats.. J Neurosci Methods. 1998; 83(2):89–96 9765121
19.
HadlockT, KowaleskiJ, LoD, et al.. Functional assessments of the rodent facial nerve: a synkinesis model.. Laryngoscope. 2008; 118(10):1744–1749 18641527
20.
HeatonJT, KowaleskiJM, BermejoR, ZeiglerHP, AhlgrenDJ, HadlockTA. A system for studying facial nerve function in rats through simultaneous bilateral monitoring of eyelid and whisker movements.. J Neurosci Methods. 2008; 171(2):197–206 18442856
21.
EatonDA, HirschBE, MansourOI. Recovery of facial nerve function after repair or grafting: our experience with 24 patients.. Am J Otolaryngol. 2007; 28(1):37–41 17162130
22.
GidleyPW, GantzBJ, RubinsteinJT. Facial nerve grafts: from cerebellopontine angle and beyond.. Am J Otol. 1999; 20(6):781–788 10565725
23.
BischoffA, GroshevaM, IrintchevA, et al.. Manual stimulation of the orbicularis oculi muscle improves eyelid closure after facial nerve injury in adult rats.. Muscle Nerve. 2009; 39(2):197–205 18932211
24.
TomovTL, Guntinas-LichiusO, GroshevaM, et al.. An example of neural plasticity evoked by putative behavioral demand and early use of vibrissal hairs after facial nerve transection.. Exp Neurol. 2002; 178(2):207–218 12504880
25.
StreppelM, PopratiloffA, AngelovDN, et al.. Significance of trigeminal sensory input on regrowth of hypoglossal and facial motoneurons after hypoglossal facial anastomosis in rats.. Acta Otolaryngol. 1998; 118(6):790–796 9870621
26.
SinisN, Guntinas-LichiusO, IrintchevA, et al.. Manual stimulation of forearm muscles does not improve recovery of motor function after injury to a mixed peripheral nerve.. Exp Brain Res. 2008; 185(3):469–483 17955222
BarbaraM, MoniniS, BuffoniA, et al.. Early rehabilitation of facial nerve deficit after acoustic neuroma surgery.. Acta Otolaryngol. 2003; 123(8):932–935 14606595
29.
CroninGW, SteenersonRL. The effectiveness of neuromuscular facial retraining combined with electromyography in facial paralysis rehabilitation.. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003; 128(4):534–538 12707657
30.
CederwallE, OlsenMF, HannerP, FogdestamI. Evaluation of a physiotherapeutic treatment intervention in “Bell's” facial palsy.. Physiother Theory Pract. 2006; 22(1):43–52 16573245
31.
KabatH, KnottM. Proprioceptive facilitation techniques for treatment of paralysis.. Phys Ther Rev. 1953; 33(2):53–64 13026412
32.
BergRW, KleinfeldD. Rhythmic whisking by rat: retraction as well as protraction of the vibrissae is under active muscular control.. J Neurophysiol. 2003; 89(1):104–117 12522163
33.
HillDN, BermejoR, ZeiglerHP, KleinfeldD. Biomechanics of the vibrissa motor plant in rat: rhythmic whisking consists of triphasic neuromuscular activity.. J Neurosci. 2008; 28(13):3438–3455 18367610
