SmithsonDJ. A model for the implementation of a hybrid digital clinical photographic service.. J Audiov Media Med. 2000; 23(2):61–64 10912325
2.
DeLangeGS, DianaM. 35 mm film vs. digital photography for patient documentation: is it time to change?. Ann Plast Surg. 1999; 42(1):15–19 9972712
3.
YavuzerR, SmirnesS, JacksonIT. Guidelines for standard photography in plastic surgery.. Ann Plast Surg. 2001; 46(3):293–300 11293523
4.
SmithRV. The digital camera in clinical practice.. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2002; 35(6):1175–1189 12687735
5.
RatnerD, ThomasCO, BickersD. The uses of digital photography in dermatology.. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1999; 41(5, pt 1):749–756 10534639
6.
DiSaiaJP, PtakJJ, AchauerBM. Digital photography for the plastic surgeon.. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998; 102(2):569–573 9703101
7.
MillerPJ, LightJ. A comparison of digital cameras.. Facial Plast Surg. 1999; 15(2):111–117 11816121
8.
KokoskaMS, CurrensJW, HollenbeakCS, ThomasJR, StackBCJr. Digital vs. 35-mm photography: to convert or not to convert?. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 1999; 1(4):276–281 10937115
9.
WallS, KazahayaK, BeckerSS, BeckerDG. Thirty-five millimeter versus digital photography: comparison of photographic quality and clinical evaluation.. Facial Plast Surg. 1999; 15(2):101–109 11816120
10.
WilcoxLA, GrimwoodRE. A comparative study of digital images versus 35-millimeter images.. Mil Med. 1995; 160(9):470–472 7478035
11.
WilliamsD. Benchmarking of the ISO 12233 slanted-edge spatial frequency response plug-in.. In: Proceedings of the Imaging Science and Technology's 1998 Image Processing, Image Quality, Image Capture, Systems Conference: Portland, Oregon: May 1998. Vol 1. Portland, OR: Society for Imaging Science and Technology; 1998:133-136
12.
GrangerEM, CuperyKM. An optical merit function (SQF) which correlates with subjective image judgements.. Photogr Sci Eng. 1972; 16(3):221–230
13.
LeeDL, WinslowAT. Performance of three image-quality metrics in ink-jet printing of plain papers.. J Electron Imaging. 1993; 2(3):174–184
ShahAR, DayanSH, HamiltonGSIII. Pitfalls of photography for facial resurfacing and rejuvenation procedures.. Facial Plast Surg. 2005; 21(2):154–161 16049895
16.
YoungS. Maintaining standard scales of reproduction in patient photography using digital cameras.. J Audiov Media Med. 2001; 24(4):162–165 11802703
17.
CarellasPT, FantoneSD. Optikos Corp. Lens testing: the measurement of MTF.. Photonics Spectra. 1989; 23(9):133–138
