The past 10 years have witnessed many advances in craniofacial surgery. Advances in surgical techniques, such as distraction osteogenesis and endoscopic procedures, combined with refinements in surgical equipment, such as resorbable plating and distractors, have improved surgical outcomes, while minimizing morbidity. Technological advances in 3-dimensional imaging, computer simulation, and intraoperative navigation facilitate diagnosis, preoperative planning, and surgical execution. Rising cases of deformational plagiocephaly owing to increased supine infant sleep positioning necessitated the development of appropriate diagnosis and treatment and the avoidance of unnecessary surgery. A greater understanding of the genetic basis of craniofacial disorders has allowed better preoperative assessment and counseling. Finally, efforts to develop better bone graft substitutes with gene therapy and nanotechnology are ongoing.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
McCarthyJG, SchreiberJ, KarpN, et al.. Lengthening the human mandible by gradual distraction.. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992; 89(1):1–8 1727238
2.
BursteinFD. Resorbable distraction of the mandible: technical evolution and clinical experience.. J Craniofac Surg. 2008; 19(3):637–643 18520376
3.
FritzMA, SidmanJD. Distraction osteogenesis of the mandible.. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004; 12(6):513–518 15548910
4.
McCarthyJG, HopperRA, HollierLH, et al.. Molding of the regenerate in mandibular distraction: clinical experience.. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003; 112(5):1239–1246 14504506
5.
JudgeB, HamlarD, RimellFL. Mandibular distraction osteogenesis in a neonate.. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1999; 125(9):1029–1032 10488992
6.
CohenSR, SimmsC, BursteinFD. Mandibular distraction osteogenesis in the treatment of upper airway obstruction in children with craniofacial deformities.. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998; 101(2):312–318 9462762
7.
BursteinFD, WilliamsJK. Mandibular distraction osteogenesis in Pierre Robin sequence: application of a new internal single-stage resorbable device.. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005; 115(1):61–67 15622233
8.
JimenezDF, BaroneCM. Endoscopic craniectomy for early surgical correction of sagittal craniosynostosis.. J Neurosurg. 1998; 88(1):77–81 9420076
9.
Di RoccoC, TamburriniG, PietriniD. Blood sparing in craniosynostosis surgery.. Semin Pediatr Neurol. 2004; 11(4):278–287 15828712
10.
MeehanM, TeschnerM, GirodS. Three-dimensional simulation and prediction of craniofacial surgery.. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2003; 6,(suppl 1):102–107 14606542
11.
WestendorffC, GulicherD, DammannF, et al.. Computer-assisted surgical treatment of orbitozygomatic fractures.. J Craniofac Surg. 2006; 17(5):837–842 17003608
12.
HeilandM, HabermannCR, SchmelzleR. Indications and limitations of intraoperative navigation in maxillofacial surgery.. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004; 62(9):1059–1063 15346354
13.
American Academy of Pediatrics Task Force on Sudden Infant Death Syndrome. The changing concept of sudden infant death syndrome: diagnostic coding shifts, controversies regarding the sleeping environment, and new variables to consider in reducing risk.. Pediatrics. 2005; 116(5):1245–1255 16216901
PaznekasWA, CunninghamML, HowardTD, et al.. Genetic heterogeneity of Saethre-Chotzen syndrome due to TWIST and FGFR mutations.. Am J Hum Genet. 1998; 62(6):1370–1380 9585583
16.
MullikenJB. The craniofacial surgeon as amateur geneticist.. J Craniofac Surg. 2002; 13(1):3–17 11886985
17.
GrippKW, McDonald-McGinnDM, GaudenzK, et al.. Identification of a genetic cause for isolated unilateral coronal synostosis: a unique mutation in the fibroblast growth factor receptor 3.. J Pediatr. 1998; 132(4):714–716 9580776
18.
MullikenJB, GrippKW, StolleCA, et al.. Molecular analysis of patients with synostotic frontal plagiocephaly (unilateral coronal synostosis).. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004; 113(7):1899–1909 15253176
19.
NussenbaumB, KrebsbachPH. The role of gene therapy for craniofacial and dental tissue engineering.. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2006; 58(4):577–591 16766080
20.
GosainAK. Plastic Surgery Educational Foundation DATA Committee. Bioactive glass for bone replacement in craniomaxillofacial reconstruction.. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004; 114(2):590–593 15277840
21.
LosquadroWD, TatumSA, AllenMJ. Polylactide–co-glycolide fiber reinforced calcium phosphate cement maintains strength at larger defect sizes under simulated dural pulsations.. Abstract presented at: American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Fall Meeting; September 20, 2007; Washington, DC
22.
StyliosG, WanT, GiannoudisP. Present status and future potential of enhancing bone healing using nanotechnology.. Injury. 2007; 38,(suppl 1):S63–S74 17383487
