Search results: Sage Journals

Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published July, 2008

Soft-copy reading in digital mammography of mass: diagnostic performance of a 5-megapixel cathode ray tube monitor versus a 3-megapixel liquid crystal display monitor in a diagnostic setting

T. Uematsu, M. Kasami

Acta Radiologica

Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published February, 2010

Detection of breast cancer by soft-copy reading of digital mammograms: Comparison between a routine image-processing parameter and high-contrast parameters

Takeshi Kamitani, Hidetake Yabuuchi, Hiroyasu Soeda [...]

Acta Radiologica

Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published November, 2005

Follow-up and final results of the oslo I study comparing screen-film mammography and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading

P. Skaane, A. Skjennald, K. Young [...]

Acta Radiologica

Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published September, 2007

Soft-copy reading in digital mammography of microcalcifications: diagnostic performance of a 5-megapixel cathode ray tube monitor versus a 3-megapixel liquid crystal display monitor in a clinical setting

T. Uematsu, M. Kasami, Y. Uchida

Acta Radiologica

Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published September, 1991

Image Quality Determines Differences in Reading Performance and Perceived Image Quality with CRT and Hard-Copy Displays

Gerard C. Jorna

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting

Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published August, 1991

Image Quality Determines Differences in Reading Performance and Perceived Image Quality with CRT and Hard-Copy Displays

Gerard C. Jorna, Harry L. Snyder

Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society

Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published December, 2009

Lcd versus crt monitors for digital mammography: a comparison of observer performance for the detection of clustered microcalcifications and masses

Joo Hee Cha, Woo Kyung Moon, Nariya Cho [...]

Acta Radiologica

Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published April, 2017

Detectability of BI-RADS category 3 or higher breast lesions and reading time on mammography: comparison between 5-MP and 8-MP LCD monitors

Hidetake Yabuuchi, Satoshi Kawanami, Takeshi Kamitani [...]

Acta Radiologica

Restricted accessReview articleFirst published February, 2009

Studies comparing screen-film mammography and full-field digital mammography in breast cancer screening: Updated review

P. Skaane

Acta Radiologica

Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published April, 2004

Evaluation of a wavelet‐based computer‐assisted detection system for identifying microcalcifications in digital full‐field mammography

F. Diekmann, S. Diekmann, M. Bollow [...]

Acta Radiologica

Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published July, 2008

Soft-copy reading in digital mammography of mass: diagnostic performance of a 5-megapixel cathode ray tube monitor versus a 3-megapixel liquid crystal display monitor in a diagnostic setting

T. Uematsu, M. Kasami

Acta Radiologica

Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published February, 2010

Detection of breast cancer by soft-copy reading of digital mammograms: Comparison between a routine image-processing parameter and high-contrast parameters

Takeshi Kamitani, Hidetake Yabuuchi, Hiroyasu Soeda [...]

Acta Radiologica

Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published November, 2005

Follow-up and final results of the oslo I study comparing screen-film mammography and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading

P. Skaane, A. Skjennald, K. Young [...]

Acta Radiologica

Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published September, 2007

Soft-copy reading in digital mammography of microcalcifications: diagnostic performance of a 5-megapixel cathode ray tube monitor versus a 3-megapixel liquid crystal display monitor in a clinical setting

T. Uematsu, M. Kasami, Y. Uchida

Acta Radiologica

Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published September, 1991

Image Quality Determines Differences in Reading Performance and Perceived Image Quality with CRT and Hard-Copy Displays

Gerard C. Jorna

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting

Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published August, 1991

Image Quality Determines Differences in Reading Performance and Perceived Image Quality with CRT and Hard-Copy Displays

Gerard C. Jorna, Harry L. Snyder

Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society

Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published December, 2009

Lcd versus crt monitors for digital mammography: a comparison of observer performance for the detection of clustered microcalcifications and masses

Joo Hee Cha, Woo Kyung Moon, Nariya Cho [...]

Acta Radiologica

Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published April, 2017

Detectability of BI-RADS category 3 or higher breast lesions and reading time on mammography: comparison between 5-MP and 8-MP LCD monitors

Hidetake Yabuuchi, Satoshi Kawanami, Takeshi Kamitani [...]

Acta Radiologica

Restricted accessReview articleFirst published February, 2009

Studies comparing screen-film mammography and full-field digital mammography in breast cancer screening: Updated review

P. Skaane

Acta Radiologica

Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published April, 2004

Evaluation of a wavelet‐based computer‐assisted detection system for identifying microcalcifications in digital full‐field mammography

F. Diekmann, S. Diekmann, M. Bollow [...]

Acta Radiologica